Implementing a Multidisciplinary Huddle to Evaluate Labor Dystocia

Melaney L. Stricklin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.05.080

2024-06-21

Abstract:No formal huddle process was in place to discuss labor dystocia and cesarean birth criteria.

nursing,obstetrics & gynecology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Preoperative Multidisciplinary Team Huddle Improves Communication and Safety for Unscheduled Cesarean Deliveries: A System Redesign Using Improvement Science

Andrea Girnius,Candice Snyder,Heather Czarny,Thomas Minges,Michael Stacey,Tamara Supinski,John Crowe,Judith Strong,Sean A Josephs,Muhammad A Zafar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006905

2024-09-13

Abstract:Background: Optimal communication between care teams is a critical component in providing safe, timely, and appropriate patient care. Labor and delivery (L&D) units experience rapidly changing clinical scenarios often requiring escalation in care and unplanned cesarean deliveries (CDs). The University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC) is a 550-bed academic level 4 maternal care center with a 13-bed L&D unit in Cincinnati, OH. There are approximately 2500 deliveries/y with a CD rate of 33%. The L&D unit is staffed with dedicated anesthesia personnel 24 hours a day. In our L&D unit, there was widespread dissatisfaction with multidisciplinary communication surrounding unscheduled CD. Near-miss safety events in our obstetric unit were attributed to preoperative communication failures. Initial surveys identified challenges in preoperative communication among nursing, anesthesiology, and obstetric teams leading to potential risk for compromised care. Method: Using the UC Health Performance Improvement Way, we first sought to understand the process leading up to unscheduled CD. Change ideas were developed based on observed failures in communication. Interventions were tested and refined through iterative plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. One key intervention was the introduction of a bedside, multidisciplinary, patient-centered, pre-CD huddle attended by nursing, anesthesia, and obstetrics representatives using a standard checklist for critical information. Qualitative patient feedback was elicited to inform change efforts. We compared patient and procedure characteristics from the baseline and huddle implementation phases. Measures: Our primary outcome measure was the satisfaction of care team members with communication around unscheduled CD. A secondary outcome was the general anesthesia (GA) rate for unscheduled CD. Our key process measure was adherence to the preoperative huddle. We tracked decision-to-incision interval (DTI) as a balancing measure. Results: Huddle adherence reached 96% for unscheduled CD within 6 months of testing and implementation. A combined survey of anesthesia, nursing, and obstetrics showed that satisfaction scores related to unscheduled CD communication improved from 3.3/5 to 4.7/5 after huddle implementation. The rate of GA use and the median DTI remained unchanged. Patients felt more engaged and reported positive experiences by being a part of the huddle discussion. Conclusions: In an academic obstetric unit, communication failures surrounding unscheduled CD were identified as a contributor to staff dissatisfaction and perception of safety risk. Implementation of a bedside multidisciplinary pre-CD huddle improved communication between teams and contributed to creating a culture of safety without causing significant delays in care.
Current situation of the midwifery skills on dystocia among 154 hospitals in Zhejiang Province

苏畅,周梦林,陈丹青

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20211025-01311

2022-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To investigate and analyze the situation of midwifery skills on dystocia among employees from different hospitals and related medical staff in Zhejiang Province.Methods:Totally 1 162 in-service staff from 154 hospitals in Zhejiang Province in 2021 joined the project in 2021. Chi-squared test was used to compare the situation of midwifery skills on dystocia from different hospitals. The results were expected to improve the management capacity on dystocia for midwives in these hospitals.Results:Among the 154 hospitals, the overall conducting rates of midwifery skills were different, management of shoulder dystocia and forceps operation/fetal head absorption were most likely to be provided by hospitals [with the proportions as 54.5% (84/154), 55.2% (85/154), respectively], and other skills were less provided; and the conducting rate of three midwifery skills were higher in Level-III hospitals than those in Level-II hospitals, including forceps operation/fetal head absorption[68.0%(51/75) vs. 43.9%(29/66)], vaginal delivery of twins[29.3%(22/75) vs. 7.6%(5/66)] and abdominal version for breech presentation [36.0%(27/75) vs.12.1%(8/66)], the differences of were all significant ( P<0.05). As for midwives and obstetricians, the mastery rates of different skills varied. However, 26.7%(310/1 162) of them actually do not master any skills. Conclusions:The conducting rates of midwifery skills on dystocia were not satisfying among hospitals in Zhejiang Province, and the managing capacity for dystocia of the midwives and obstetricians needs to be improved, the measures should include reasonable resources allocation, supporting first and second-level hospitals, strengthening the standardized training and clinical practice of midwives based on an individualized strategy for midwives with different training experience.
Implementation of a Labor Dystocia Checklist to Reduce NTSV C-Section Rates

Karli Swenson,Michael Bradfield,Alexa Czmowski,Kelsey West,Gretchen Schulz,Amber Johnson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.891654

2024-09-24

Abstract:Background and objectives: Cesarean section (c-section) rates among nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex (NTSV) pregnancies are increasing, posing risk to the infant and birthing parent. To reach the Healthy People 2030 goal of an NTSV c-section rate below 23.6%, teams must remain aware of their NTSV c-section rate and implement mechanisms to reduce it. This project was conducted to assess the impact of quality improvement interventions implemented by family medicine residents to reduce a hospital's NTSV rate. Methods: From 2021 to 2023, family medicine residents were educated on evidenced-based diagnosis of labor dystocia, failed induction of labor, arrest of dilation, and arrest of descent in first-time birthing parents. Learning was reinforced by implementing the Colorado Perinatal Care Quality Collaborative's labor dystocia checklist. Quarterly assessment of the hospital's NTSV rate and checklist utilization were monitored and widely reported. Results: After the implementation of a standard checklist, the NTSV c-section rate at the tertiary care center declined from 35.6% in 2020 to a sustained rate below the 2030 Healthy People goal of 23.6%. Notably, patients with public insurance saw the greatest reduction in NTSV c-section rates. Hospital staff highlighted the benefits of using the checklist, including more effective electronic documentation of labor progression, improvement in team dynamics, and increased team communication. Conclusions: Using a labor dystocia checklist is a successful method for teams to reduce NTSV c-section rates and can be used as a training tool for family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology residency programs that care for laboring persons.
Using Simulation to Improve Management of a Shoulder Dystocia Delivery by Experienced Nurse Midwives

Hindi E. Stohl,Judy H. Chen,Jenny M. Jaque

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22374/cjmrp.v11i2.107

2024-05-14

Abstract:Objective: To assess the impact of a standardized shoulder dystocia simulation experience on the management of a complicated delivery by experienced midwives at an academic institution.Method: Experienced midwives from a single institution underwent a standardized simulated shoulder dystocia delivery. The simulation was conducted four times for each midwife. The first simulation occurred prior to any educational intervention, and the subsequent three deliveries were performed after a standardized didactic. Performance was scored based on standardized criteria to assess for accuracy and comprehensiveness of the delivery.Results: Seven midwives were included. The lowest and highest scores for the first drill were 11 and 15 respectively, and for the fourth drill, 19 and 21 respectively. Conclusion: Simulation training of experienced midwives with a standardized shoulder dystocia scenario results in improved communication and leadership skills.
Single-center task analysis and user-centered assessment of physical space impacts on emergency Cesarean delivery

Kenji T. Sotto,Laura C. Hedli,Lillian Sie,Kimber Padua,Nicole Yamada,Henry Lee,Louis Halamek,Kay Daniels,Dan Nathan-Roberts,Naola S. Austin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252888

IF: 3.7

2021-06-10

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Cesarean delivery is the most common surgery performed in the United States, accounting for approximately 32% of all births. Emergency Cesarean deliveries are performed in the event of critical maternal or fetal distress and require effective collaboration and coordination of care by a multidisciplinary team with a high level of technical expertise. It is not well understood how the physical environment of the operating room (OR) impacts performance and how specialties work together in the space. Objective This study aimed to begin to address this gap using validated techniques in human factors to perform a participatory user-centered analysis of physical space during emergency Cesarean. Methods This study employed a mixed-methods design. Focus group interviews and surveys were administered to a convenience sample (n = 34) of multidisciplinary obstetric teams. Data collected from focus group interviews were used to perform a task and equipment analysis. Survey data were coded and mapped by specialty to identify reported areas of congestion and time spent, and to identify themes related to physical space of the OR and labor and delivery unit. Results Task analysis revealed complex interdependencies between specialties. Thirty task groupings requiring over 20 pieces of equipment were identified. Perceived areas of congestion and areas of time spent in the OR varied by clinical specialty. The following categories emerged as main challenges encountered during an emergency Cesarean: 1) size of physical space and equipment, 2) layout and orientation, and 3) patient transport. Conclusion User insights on physical space and workflow processes during emergency Cesarean section at the institution studied revealed challenges related to getting the patients into the OR expediently and having space to perform tasks without crowding or staff injury. By utilizing human factors techniques, other institutions may build upon our findings to improve safety during emergency situations on labor and delivery.

multidisciplinary sciences
A Qualitative Study of Hospitals and Payers Implementing Community Doula Support

Christina Gebel,Elysia Larson,Heather A. Olden,Cara B. Safon,Tonia J. Rhone,Ndidiamaka N. Amutah‐Onukagha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13596

2024-01-21

Abstract:Introduction The impact of doula care on birth outcomes is well‐established; however, doula support remains underutilized. Identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation is integral as the demand for doula care increases. The primary objective of this study was to examine doula program implementation across hospitals and payers at varying stages of implementation. Methods Representatives from 4 hospitals and 2 payers participated in focus group discussions. The doula programs were categorized as anticipated, initial, and advanced implementation statuses. Coding and thematic analysis were conducted using a deductive application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results There were 20 participants across 5 focus group discussions. Participants were mostly female, and nearly all had worked at their organization for at least 2 years. Salient themes shared across participants included valuing internal outcome data or peer‐reviewed literature to support doula care as well as anecdotal stories; the reality of the resource‐intensive nature of doula care implementation that goes beyond funding for doulas; and both the need for individual champions for change, such as midwives, and a supportive organizational culture that values health equity. Discussion The findings of this study highlight 3 contextual aspects that should be considered when implementing doula programs. These recommendations include: (1) use of a combination of research evidence and anecdotes when eliciting stakeholder support; (2) consideration of resources beyond funding such as program implementation support; (3) critical evaluation of organizational culture as a primary driver influencing the implementation of doula care. The future of the doula workforce in United States hospitals rests on the crux of intentional buy‐in from hospital administration and clinical providers as well as the availability of requisite resources.

nursing
Mode of Delivery: Development and Implementation of an Obstetrical In Situ Simulation Program

Valerie Bloomfield,Susan Ellis,Julie Pace,Michelle Morais

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.12.011

Abstract:Objective: Simulation is increasingly valued as a learning tool in obstetrical practice. In situ simulation assesses the hands-on and critical thinking skills of a health care team within their clinical setting. We aimed to create an in situ simulation program to promote skills acquisition, enhance teamwork, and identify system limitations. Methods: Key obstetrical emergencies were identified through a needs assessment. In situ simulations were developed to address these clinical presentations. During simulations, organizers and participants identified latent safety threats. Medical management was evaluated through comprehensive emergency-specific checklists. Leadership attitudes were assessed using the modified Perinatal Emergency Team Response Assessment tool. Following each simulation, team members were debriefed, and qualitative and quantitative feedback was solicited and aggregated by specialty and discipline. Results: Simulations were conducted monthly at two academic centers over 14 months. Participation was interdisciplinary, including learners, staff physicians, nursing, and allied health team members from the departments of obstetrics, anesthesia, emergency medicine, and neonatology. Participants reported their involvement was enjoyable. Participants reported improvements in communication skills, content knowledge, and procedural knowledge. Participants favourably rated the spontaneity of simulations, clinically relevant scenarios, safe environment, and use of realistic equipment. Latent safety threats, related to equipment, medication, personnel, resources, and technical skills, were identified. Conclusion: We present the successful implementation of a comprehensive in situ simulation program. In situ simulation allows for deliberate practice of obstetrical emergencies and promotes a culture of patient safety. Lessons learned provide valuable data to identify limitations within our current practices and inform future policy change.
Interprofessional Team Member Communication Patterns, Teamwork, and Collaboration in Pre–family Meeting Huddles in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

Jennifer K Walter,Theodore E Schall,Aaron G DeWitt,Jennifer Faerber,Heather Griffis,Meghan Galligan,Victoria Miller,Robert M Arnold,Chris Feudtner,Jennifer K. Walter,Theodore E. Schall,Aaron G. DeWitt,Robert M. Arnold

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.009

IF: 5.576

2019-07-01

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract:<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Context</h3><p>Interprofessional teams often develop a care plan prior to engaging in a family meeting in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU)—a process that can affect the course of the family meeting and alter team dynamics, but that has not been studied.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To characterize the types of interactions that interprofessional team members have in pre-family meetings huddles in the pediatric CICU by 1) evaluating the amount of time each team member speaks; 2) assessing team communication and teamwork using standardized instruments; and 3) measuring team members' perceptions of collaboration and satisfaction with decision-making.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a prospective observational study in a pediatric CICU. Subjects were members of the interprofessional team attending preparation meetings prior to care meetings with families of patients admitted to the CICU for longer than two weeks. We quantitatively coded the amount each team member spoke. We assessed team performance of communication and teamwork using the PACT-Novice tool, and we measured perception of collaboration and satisfaction with decision-making using the CSACD questionnaire.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Physicians spoke for an average of 83.9% of each meeting's duration (SD 7.5%); non-physicians averaged 9.9% (SD 5.2%). Teamwork behaviors were present and adequately performed as judged by trained observers. Significant differences in physician and non-physician perceptions of collaboration were found in 3 out of 10 observed meetings.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Interprofessional team members' interactions in team meetings provide important information about team dynamics, revealing potential opportunities for improved collaboration and communication in team meetings and subsequent family meetings.</p>

medicine, general & internal,clinical neurology,health care sciences & services
Team Performance in High-Fidelity Simulations of Postpartum Hemorrhage Management [A336]

Rae A. Buttle,Sarah Detlefs,Dena Goffman,Michael R. Foley,Cade Crump,Shad Deering

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000825460.40783.80

2022-05-01

Abstract:Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality and presents care teams with unique, time-sensitive challenges. Simulation provides a way to evaluate team performance with no risk to patients. Identification of common errors is important to target training and optimize outcomes. High-fidelity simulation exercises were conducted at a national obstetric critical care conference between 2014 and 2019. A simulated case of a PPH preceded by placental abruption was performed by multidisciplinary teams using high-fidelity simulators. Team performance was evaluated using a standardized checklist of key actions, and each item was scored as “not done”, “poorly done”, or “well done”. Descriptive statistics were then compiled for analysis. The study was reviewed and determined to be exempt by the hospital institutional review board. Complete performance data was available for 155 teams. Appropriate diagnosis of etiology of the hemorrhage (uterine atony) and timely recognition of the need for operative management was well done by most teams (91% and 92.3%, respectively). However, a significant number of teams demonstrated poor performance regarding inspection for lacerations (34.2%) and checking for retained products of conception (38.1%). Additionally, poor performance was identified for timely initiation of blood transfusion (11.6%) and activation of a massive transfusion protocol (20.6%). Thorough assessment of time-sensitive care interventions revealed specific deficits in team performance of PPH. High-fidelity simulation provides opportunities for exposure to obstetric emergency and may help to both target and determine the effectiveness of trainings designed to address these identified performance gaps.

obstetrics & gynecology
Intrapartum Maternal Cardiac Arrest: A Simulation Case for Multidisciplinary Providers

Allison Lee,Jean-Ju Sheen,Stacey Richards

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10768

2018-10-26

MedEdPORTAL

Abstract:Introduction: Cardiac arrest in pregnancy is rare. Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support courses rarely address interventions specific to obstetric patients, and knowledge gaps are frequent among providers. The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology and American Heart Association have published guidelines regarding management of cardiac arrest in pregnancy, and interdisciplinary simulation training has been advocated to reinforce key management points for this clinical scenario. Methods: In situ multidisciplinary simulation training was implemented for anesthesia and maternal fetal medicine fellows and obstetric nurses at our hospital. The case was amniotic fluid embolism in a 35-year-old parturient at term. The patient had a witnessed seizure before cardiovascular collapse. Learners were expected to initiate high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation and perform a perimortem cesarean delivery within 5 minutes while demonstrating clear communication with each other. The case required a labor room, high-fidelity mannequin, defibrillator, code cart, cesarean section instruments, and simulated medications and intravenous fluids. Results: Participants comprised two obstetric anesthesia fellows, three maternal fetal medicine fellows, and three obstetric nurses. Positive feedback about the training and increased perceptions of self-efficacy were received. Potential systems issues were detected and corrected because of the training, highlighting the value of in situ drills. Discussion: We found it challenging to implement more frequent multidisciplinary sessions, but participants found the experience highly rewarding. We hope to expand the training to all physicians and nurses covering the unit on a regular basis. Modified scenario versions are being used for nursing-only and obstetric resident-only simulations during protected teaching time for those services.
Improving Patient Care and Teamwork Through Multidisciplinary Drills

Laura Brown,Erin Smargisso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.05.083

2024-06-21

Abstract:Despite advances in health care and technology, maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States has increased over the past several decades.

nursing,obstetrics & gynecology
Maternity healthcare professionals experiences of supporting women in decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative study

Kitty Hardman,Anna Davies,Andrew Demetri,Gemma Clayton,Danya Bakhbakhi,Katherine Birchenall,Sonia Barnfield,Abigail Fraser,Christy Burden,Sheelagh McGuinness,Rachel Miller,Abi Merriel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080961

IF: 3.006

2024-04-30

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objectives To explore and characterise maternity healthcare professionals' (MHCPs) experience and practice of shared decision-making (SDM), to inform policy, research and practice development. Design Qualitative focus group study. Setting Large Maternity Unit in the Southwest of England. Participants MHCPs who give information relating to clinical procedures and pregnancy care relating to labour and birth and are directly involved in decision-making conversations were purposively sampled to ensure representation across MHCP groups. Data collection A semistructured topic guide was used. Data analysis Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken. Results Seven focus groups were conducted, comprising a total of 24 participants (3–5 per group). Two themes were developed: contextualising decision-making and controversies in current decision-making. Contextual factors that influenced decision-making practices included lack of time and challenges faced in intrapartum care. MHCPs reported variation in how they approach decision-making conversations and asked for more training on how to consistently achieve SDM. There were communication challenges with women who did not speak English. Three controversies were explored: the role of prior clinical experience, the validity of informed consent when women were in pain and during life-threatening emergencies and instances where women declined medical advice. Conclusions We found that MHCPs are committed to SDM but need better support to deliver it. Structured processes including Core Information Sets, communication skills training and decision support aids may help to consistently deliver SDM in maternity care.

medicine, general & internal
Clinicians Speak: We Need to Redesign Postpartum Care

Abby E Halm,Paige Hornsby,Shreya Shetty,Cristalle Madray,Ann Kellams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/JPE-2023-0023

2024-07-01

Abstract:Research indicates gaps in postpartum care that negatively impact maternal and infant health. Prior research exploring clinicians' perspectives on these gaps is limited to those of maternal providers. We explored the views and experiences of maternal and infant health-care providers on the care of mothers and infants in the postpartum period. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: Gaps in Infant Care Education and Preparation for Parenting, Gaps in Maternal Pregnancy and Postpartum Care and Expectations and Knowledge, and Ideas for Integrating Care, Education, and Support in the postpartum period. Results suggest a need for care models that offer improved prenatal education and expectation setting, methods to help mothers prepare their social support networks, and integrated and convenient access to postpartum care.
Impact of multidisciplinary team huddles on patient safety: a systematic review and proposed taxonomy

Brian J Franklin,Tejal K Gandhi,David W Bates,Nadia Huancahuari,Charles A Morris,Madelyn Pearson,Michelle Beth Bass,Eric Goralnick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009911

2020-04-07

Abstract:Background Despite significant advances, patient safety remains a critical public health concern. Daily huddles—discussions to identify and respond to safety risks—have been credited with enhancing safety culture in operationally complex industries including aviation and nuclear power. More recently, huddles have been endorsed as a mechanism to improve patient safety in healthcare. This review synthesises the literature related to the impact of hospital-based safety huddles. Methods We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature related to scheduled, multidisciplinary, hospital-based safety huddles through December 2019. We screened for studies (1) in which huddles were the primary intervention being assessed and (2) that measured the huddle programme’s apparent impact using at least one quantitative metric. Results We identified 1034 articles; 24 met our criteria for review, of which 19 reflected unit-based huddles and 5 reflected hospital-wide or multiunit huddles. Of the 24 included articles, uncontrolled pre–post comparison was the prevailing study design; we identified only two controlled studies. Among the 12 unit-based studies that provided complete measures of statistical significance for reported outcomes, 11 reported statistically significant improvement among some or all outcomes. The objectives of huddle programmes and the language used to describe them varied widely across the studies we reviewed. Conclusion While anecdotal accounts of successful huddle programmes abound and the evidence we reviewed appears favourable overall, high-quality peer-reviewed evidence regarding the effectiveness of hospital-based safety huddles, particularly at the hospital-wide level, is in its earliest stages. Additional rigorous research—especially focused on huddle programme design and implementation fidelity—would enhance the collective understanding of how huddles impact patient safety and other targeted outcomes. We propose a taxonomy and standardised reporting measures for future huddle-related studies to enhance comparability and evidence quality.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Building Capacity of Community Health Centers to Improve the Provision of Postpartum Care Services Through Data-Driven Health Information Technology and Innovation

Lisa Romero,Jennifer Du Mond,Pedro B Carneiro,Raymonde Uy,Jayson Osika,Jena Wallander Gemkow,Ta-Yun Yang,Michele Whitt,AnnMarie Overholser,Seren Karasu,Katherine Curtis,Julia Skapik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0364

Abstract:Maternal morbidity and mortality remain significant challenges in the United States, with substantial burden during the postpartum period. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in partnership with the National Association of Community Health Centers, began an initiative to build capacity in Federally Qualified Health Centers to (1) improve the infrastructure for perinatal care measures and (2) use perinatal care measures to identify and address gaps in postpartum care. Two partner health center-controlled networks implemented strategies to integrate evidence-based recommendations into the clinic workflow and used data-driven health information technology (HIT) systems to improve data standardization for quality improvement of postpartum care services. Ten measures were created to capture recommended care and services. To support measure capture, a data cleaning algorithm was created to prioritize defining pregnancy episodes and delivery dates and address data inconsistencies. Quality improvement activities targeted postpartum care delivery tailored to patients and care teams. Data limitations, including inconsistencies in electronic health record documentation and data extraction practices, underscored the complexity of integrating HIT solutions into postpartum care workflows. Despite challenges, the project demonstrated continuous quality improvement to support data quality for perinatal care measures. Future solutions emphasize the need for standardized data elements, collaborative care team engagement, and iterative HIT implementation strategies to enhance perinatal care quality. Our findings highlight the potential of HIT-driven interventions to improve postpartum care within health centers, with a focus on the importance of addressing data interoperability and documentation challenges to optimize and monitor initiatives to improve postpartum health outcomes.
Improving Resident Comfort With Peripartum Cesarean Hysterectomy Through the Use of Low-Fidelity Simulation Models

Recia Frenn,Elise Heisler,Geoffrey Chen,Dani Zoorob

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69056

2024-09-10

Cureus

Abstract:Introduction Cesarean hysterectomy is a relatively rarely performed, complex, life-saving procedure considered during post-partum hemorrhage and other obstetric complications. This multi-site study aimed at validating a low-cost, low-fidelity cesarean hysterectomy model to support resident proficiency and increase their confidence in performing this critical procedure. Materials and methods We developed a low-fidelity, anatomically representative model for cesarean hysterectomy simulation purposes. Obstetrics and Gynecology residents at two residency programs were offered a simulation experience using the model, with a performance assessment via two validated assessment tools. The clinical case involved a 38 y/o woman with a delivery complicated by postpartum hemorrhage who failed conservative therapy and required a peripartum hysterectomy. Participants included 26 residents, postgraduate year (PGY)1 through PGY4, at two midwestern university-based obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. Results The median resident scores on the Task Specific Checklist (TSC) and Global Rating Scale (GRS) correlated with increasing PGY levels. The combined TSC+GRS score was a median of 40 out of 49 total for the PGY4 class, while the PGY1 class had a median combined TSC+GRS score of 12 of 49. The PGY2 and -3 classes had TSC+GRS scores of 14 and 28, respectively. The simulation model was well-received with a median 4/5 rating for improving comfort level with cesarean hysterectomy and a median 4/5 rating for model realism. Conclusion This study validated a cost-effective, easily reproducible model that highlights the vital anatomy relevant to a cesarean hysterectomy. The model and simulation offer a way to introduce cesarean hysterectomies to residents while in training, particularly at sites that may not perform a substantial number of these procedures.
Increasing Collaboration to Decrease Primary Cesareans

Sarah Wagner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.05.084

2024-06-21

Abstract:An increase in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex, living (NTSVL) cesarean rates in a 14-bed labor and delivery unit in an academic Magnet® hospital prompted an initiative to review best nursing evidence to reduce first birth cesarean rates. This presentation focuses on describing exemplar strategies used to foster nursing innovation and practice change to promote optimal patient outcomes in laboring primparas.

nursing,obstetrics & gynecology
A Collaborative and Multidisciplinary Nurse Residency and Fellowship Program

Kristen Lynch,Laura Ortiz Carter,Melanie Breitkreuz,Jennifer Loftin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.05.034

2024-06-21

Abstract:Increasing rates of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States present significant concerns for health care providers. Current literature indicates challenges in effectively training novice perinatal nurses. This lack of effective training leads to insufficient knowledge and lack of recognition of complications, resulting in delayed interventions and compromised obstetric outcomes.

nursing,obstetrics & gynecology
Clinical evaluation of labor: an evidence- and experience-based approach

Wayne R Cohen,Emanuel A Friedman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0256

2020-10-19

Abstract:During labor mother and fetus are evaluated at intervals to assess their well-being and determine how the labor is progressing. These assessments require skillful physical diagnosis and the ability to translate the acquired information into meaningful prognostic decision-making. We describe a coordinated approach to the assessment of labor. Graphing of serial measurements of cervical dilatation and fetal station creates "labor curves," which provide diagnostic and prognostic information. Based on these curves we recognize nine discrete labor abnormalities. Many may be related to insufficient or disordered contractile mechanisms. Several factors are strongly associated with development of labor disorders, including cephalopelvic disproportion, excess analgesia, fetal malpositions, intrauterine infection, and maternal obesity. Clinical cephalopelvimetry involves assessing pelvic traits and predicting their effects on labor. These observations must be integrated with information derived from the labor curves. Exogenous oxytocin is widely used. It has a high therapeutic index, but is easily misused. Oxytocin treatment should be restricted to situations in which its potential benefits clearly outweigh its risks. This requires there be a documented labor dysfunction or a legitimate medical reason to shorten the labor. Normal labor and delivery pose little risk to a healthy fetus; but dysfunctional labors, especially if stimulated excessively by oxytocin or terminated by complex operative vaginal delivery, have the potential for considerable harm. Conscientiously implemented, the approach to the evaluation of labor outlined in this review will result in a reasonable cesarean rate and minimize risks that may accrue from the labor and delivery process.
Video analysis of real‐life shoulder dystocia to assess technical and non‐technical performance

Kristiane Roed Hjorth‐Hansen,Lena Rosvig,Lone Hvidman,Ole Kierkegaard,Niels Uldbjerg,Tanja Manser,Lise Brogaard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14900

2024-06-26

Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract:Video analyses of obstetric teams' management of shoulder dystocia are an effective tool to reveal challenges with non‐technical skills and identify typical clinical pitfalls. Introduction Managing obstetric shoulder dystocia requires swift action using correct maneuvers. However, knowledge of obstetric teams' performance during management of real‐life shoulder dystocia is limited, and the impact of non‐technical skills has not been adequately evaluated. We aimed to analyze videos of teams managing real‐life shoulder dystocia to identify clinical challenges associated with correct management and particular non‐technical skills correlated with high technical performance. Material and Methods We included 17 videos depicting teams managing shoulder dystocia in two Danish delivery wards, where deliveries were initially handled by midwives, and consultants were available for complications. Delivery rooms contained two or three cameras activated by Bluetooth upon obstetrician entry. Videos were captured 5 min before and after activation. Two obstetricians assessed the videos; technical performances were scored as low (0–59), average (60–84), or high (85–100). Two other assessors evaluated non‐technical skills using the Global Assessment of Team Performance checklist, scoring 6 (poor) to 30 (excellent). We used a spline regression model to explore associations between these two score sets. Inter‐rater agreement was assessed using interclass correlation coefficients. Results Interclass correlation coefficients were 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.23–0.89) and 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.52–0.94) for clinical and non‐technical performances, respectively. Two teams had low technical performance scores; four teams achieved high scores. Teams adhered well to guidelines, demonstrating limited head traction, McRoberts maneuver, and internal rotation maneuvers. Several clinical skills posed challenges, notably recognizing shoulder impaction, applying suprapubic pressure, and discouraging women from pushing. Two non‐technical skills were associated with high technical performance: effective patient communication, with teams calming the mother and guiding her collaboration during internal rotational maneuvers, and situation awareness, where teams promptly mobilized all essential personnel (senior midwife, consultant, pediatric team). Team communication, stress management, and task management skills were not associated with high technical performance. Conclusions Videos capturing teams managing real‐life shoulder dystocia are an effective tool to reveal challenges with certain technical and non‐technical skills. Teams with high technical performance are associated with effective patient communication and situational awareness. Future training should include technical skills and non‐technical skills, patient communication, and situation awareness.

obstetrics & gynecology

Implementing a Multidisciplinary Huddle to Evaluate Labor Dystocia

Preoperative Multidisciplinary Team Huddle Improves Communication and Safety for Unscheduled Cesarean Deliveries: A System Redesign Using Improvement Science

Current situation of the midwifery skills on dystocia among 154 hospitals in Zhejiang Province

Implementation of a Labor Dystocia Checklist to Reduce NTSV C-Section Rates

Using Simulation to Improve Management of a Shoulder Dystocia Delivery by Experienced Nurse Midwives

Single-center task analysis and user-centered assessment of physical space impacts on emergency Cesarean delivery

A Qualitative Study of Hospitals and Payers Implementing Community Doula Support

Mode of Delivery: Development and Implementation of an Obstetrical In Situ Simulation Program

Interprofessional Team Member Communication Patterns, Teamwork, and Collaboration in Pre–family Meeting Huddles in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

Team Performance in High-Fidelity Simulations of Postpartum Hemorrhage Management [A336]

Intrapartum Maternal Cardiac Arrest: A Simulation Case for Multidisciplinary Providers

Improving Patient Care and Teamwork Through Multidisciplinary Drills

Maternity healthcare professionals experiences of supporting women in decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative study

Clinicians Speak: We Need to Redesign Postpartum Care

Impact of multidisciplinary team huddles on patient safety: a systematic review and proposed taxonomy

Building Capacity of Community Health Centers to Improve the Provision of Postpartum Care Services Through Data-Driven Health Information Technology and Innovation

Improving Resident Comfort With Peripartum Cesarean Hysterectomy Through the Use of Low-Fidelity Simulation Models

Increasing Collaboration to Decrease Primary Cesareans

A Collaborative and Multidisciplinary Nurse Residency and Fellowship Program

Clinical evaluation of labor: an evidence- and experience-based approach

Video analysis of real‐life shoulder dystocia to assess technical and non‐technical performance