MINSK GROUP MEDIATION PROCESS: EXPLAINING THE FAILURE PEACE TALKS

N. Abbasov

Abstract:Abstract The paper addresses a question of why the peace efforts under the Minsk Group mediation have not been successful despite of more than two decades negotiations. It has been persistently argued that the Minsk Group’s inability and inadequacy is the primary reason for the failure of the peace talks between the conflicting sides. This paper takes a different perspective: although the Minsk-Group mediation is not without flaws, the failure of its peace efforts is not directly associated with its inability, but stemmed from the power relationships among the major influential actors in the region. The paper argues that it is not the incompetency of the Minsk Group mediation that brought the peace talks to the deadlock, but the power relationships among major actors in South Caucasus that limited the capability of the regional organization. The paper concludes that the status quo less likely to change in the near future since two options- war and a peaceful settlement that would transform the status quo are unlikely to happen because of the current power politics of the influential actors in the region.  South Caucasus is a part of the Russian “near abroad”, and the West is reluctant to push for a peaceful settlement due to its limited interests in South Caucasus. Armenia does not have any reason to start a war. War is too risky for Azerbaijan. Thus, the status quo is more likely to prevail because of power relationships in the region. The systemic level of analysis is the primary analysis used in the paper for the explanation of the central reasons for the failure of the Minsk Group peace talks on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Political Science