Extended depth of focus IOL in eyes with different axial myopia and targeted refraction

Xiaohui Wang,Sinan Liu,Yinqi Chen,Jinping Gong,Nuozhou Wu,Yihua Yao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03442-5

IF: 2.086

2024-04-24

BMC Ophthalmology

Abstract:To evaluate the objective visual outcomes following implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) in individuals with varying axial lengths (AL) and targeted refraction.

ophthalmology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Fabrication and performance evaluation of a design for an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on an improved sinusoidal profile

Yuwei Xing,Yongji Liu,Kunqi Li,Hui Song,Mengchen Xu,Jie Zhang,Hongliang Liu,Hangjian Zhang,Yan Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.521105

2024-05-24

Abstract:This study presents the fabrication and evaluation of a sinusoidal extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lens (IOL) based on our previously proposed design approach. The power, through-focus MTF, and surface profile were measured using commercial instruments. Through-focus images of a United States Air Force (USAF) 1951 resolution target formed by the fabricated IOL were compared with Symfony and AR40E under monochromatic and polychromatic light using optical bench testing. Simulations assessed visual acuity (VA) of a pseudophakic model eye with the EDoF IOL, including evaluation of tilt and decentration effects. Results indicate that the base power, add power, and the through-focus MTF@50 lp/mm of the fabricated IOL at a 3 mm pupil size align with the design specifications. The extended-depth-of-focus and imaging performance for the far vision of the fabricated IOL under both monochromatic and polychromatic light conditions at a 3.0 mm pupil diameter is comparable to that of Symfony. In addition, the fabricated IOL exhibits a similar extended-depth-of-focus for three discrete wavelengths. The pseudophakic model eye with the designed EDoF IOL demonstrates a VA exceeding 0.1 logMAR within a defocus range of 2.44 D. The VA is tolerant to both IOL tilt and decentration. These findings demonstrate the promising potential of the sinusoidal EDoF IOL design for future applications in cataract surgery.
The Postoperative Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Trifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Patients with Different Biometric Characteristics

Chia-Yi Lee,Hung-Chi Chen,Ie-Bin Lian,Jing-Yang Huang,Shun-Fa Yang,Chao-Kai Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161717

2024-08-07

Abstract:We aimed to survey the potential correlation between biometric parameters and postoperative outcomes after implanting extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) and trifocal IOLs. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and patients receiving EDOF or trifocal IOL implantations were included. In total, 36 and 26 eyes were enrolled in the EDOF and trifocal groups, respectively. The primary outcomes of this study were the postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and spherical equivalent (SE). The generalized linear model was applied to evaluate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of primary outcomes in patients with different biometric characters. The final UDVA of the EDOF group was significantly better than that of the trifocal group (p = 0.020), and the UNVA and SE did not show significant differences between the two groups throughout the postoperative period (all p > 0.05). In a multivariable analysis, the UDVA was significantly better in the EDOF group than in the trifocal group (p = 0.038). For the subgroup analysis, the high axial length (AXL) value correlated to a lower postoperative UDVA in the EDOF group (both p < 0.05). Additionally, a large white-to-white (WTW) diameter was related to worse postoperative UNVA in the trifocal group (p = 0.042), and a high AXL was associated with higher SE in both the EDOF and trifocal groups (both p < 0.05). In conclusion, a high AXL correlates to worse postoperative outcomes in both the EDOF and trifocal IOLs, and trifocal IOL outcomes could be affected by large WTW diameters.
Comparison of Patient Outcomes Following Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yining Guo,Yinhao Wang,Ran Hao,Xiaodan Jiang,Ziyuan Liu,Xuemin Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1115076

2021-01-01

Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:The purpose is to compare the outcomes of implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (TIOLs) and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs).A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov was conducted in March 2020 to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis of the results was performed. Patients implanted with EDOF IOLs or TIOLs in previous studies were included. The primary outcomes of the study were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and defocus curve.TIOLs and EDOF IOLs provided comparable binocular UDVA (MD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.04, 0.03, logMAR). However, EDOF IOLs provided better UIVA (MD: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.14, -0.01, logMAR) and worse UNVA (MD: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.14, logMAR) than TIOLs. Fewer patients achieved spectacle independence after implantation of EDOF IOLs (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.87) than after implantation of TIOLs, especially for near vision (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.99). There was no statistically significant difference in contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic or mesopic conditions with both IOLs. Patient satisfaction after implantation of both IOLs was high.EDOF IOLs and TIOLs provide comparable distance vision. However, EDOF IOLs provide better intermediate vision and worse near vision than TIOLs. The advantages of EDOF IOLs over TIOLs in terms of CS, aberrations, and visual disturbance are not significant. Patients are satisfied with both types of IOLs.
Comparative visual outcomes of EDOF intraocular lens with FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification

Jia Xu,Wenbo Li,Zhe Xu,Binsong Zhao,Yueyang Zhong,Kai Wang,Xin Liu,Xiaohui Song,Yinhui Yu,Yanan Zhu,Qiaomei Tang,Ke Yao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001027

2022-12-29

Abstract:At present, cataract surgery, which was originally only used monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) to restore vision at 1 specific distance, has evolved into refractive cataract surgery. 1 The extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL TECNIS Symfony (Johnson & Johnson Vision), a new concept IOL, based on a proprietary achromatic diffraction echelette design, is proven to be capable of restoring the patient's far, intermediate, and part of near vision, producing EDOF and minimal interference light phenomenon. 2,3

ophthalmology,surgery
Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens

Giacomo Savini,Nicole Balducci,Claudio Carbonara,Scipione Rossi,Manuel Altieri,Nicola Frugis,Emilia Zappulla,Roberto Bellucci,Giovanni Alessio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0221-1

Abstract:Background/objective: This study aimed to investigate the visual performance of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF-IOL). Subjects/methods: In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, we enrolled 97 patients who underwent cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange with implantation of the Mini Well EDOF-IOL (SIFI, Italy). Patients underwent postoperatively the following examinations between 4 and 8 weeks after surgery: corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), reading speed with Radner's chart, distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and haloes quantitative assessment. Results: In the whole sample, the mean monocular CDVA and DCNVA were, respectively, 0.02 ± 0.07 logMAR and 0.38 ± 0.15 logRAD (logarithm of the reading acuity determination). In the 67 bilaterally implanted patients, binocular CDVA and DCNVA were better (0.00 ± 0.05 logMAR and 0.26 ± 0.13 logRAD) than the corresponding monocular values (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0002, respectively). Ninety-two percent of patients bilaterally implanted reached a binocular reading speed >80 words per minute at a 0.5 logRAD print size (corresponding to the common book print size). The defocus curves showed that the EDOF-IOL provided increased depth of focus through 2.0 D of defocus, with the best performance at 1.0 and 1.5 D. Contrast sensitivity was within normal limits at all spatial frequencies. The mean visual disturbance index was 0.08 ± 0.12, suggesting low night visual disturbances. Conclusions: The new EDOF-IOL provided good visual acuity for distance, intermediate, and near vision, with no loss of contrast sensitivity and low risk of night visual disturbances.
Efficacy and comfort following the implantation of extended depth of focus, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract patients

Junhui Wang,Jiawei Luo,Wenyu Yang,Ruoxin Ren,Yi Xie,Jiaxin Li,Huaijin Guan,Min Ji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03685-2

IF: 2.086

2024-09-30

BMC Ophthalmology

Abstract:Extended depth of focus (EDOF) and multifocal (Multi) intraocular lenses (IOL) can provide a fixed distance of near vision, which may result in some discomfort for patients who prefer different near distances. The aim of this study was to compare the vision, comfortable near distance (CND) and visual comfort in patients who underwent implantation of EDOF, Multi, and monofocal (Mono) IOLs.

ophthalmology
Presbyopia correction with a new Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens

Rozaliya Hristova,Galateya Tsvetkova,Denitsa Cholakova,Gergana Ivanova,Vassil Haykin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2022.46

Abstract:Extended depth of focus intraocular lenses (EDoF IOLs) offer an expanded number of modalities for simultaneous cataract and presbyopia treatment. The objective of the current study was to assess clinical outcomes with a new mono-EDoF intraocular lens and to analyze the effect of different parameters on postoperative results. The inclusion criteria were defined as uneventful cataract surgery, no history of concomitant ocular disease, implantation of ZOE Primus-HD lens. Parameters from IOL Master 500 were analyzed. The main outcome measures were postoperative uncorrected distance (UDVA) and intermediate (UIVA) visual acuity. The study included 39 eyes of 37 patients (15 males and 22 females) with a mean age of 73.59±7.71. Postoperatively, the UDVA improved to 0.84±0.16 (p<0.001) and UIVA was 0.86±0.14. There was no correlation between K1, K2 and IOL power with both postoperative UDVA and IDVA. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between UDVA and UIVA between patients with mean K value over or under 44.0D (p=0.204 and p=0.817, respectively). The results of a multinomial logistic regression analysis for the predictive value of the factors K1, K2 and IOL power demonstrated no statistical significance, except for UIVA with a significant influence of IOL power (p=0.024) in patients with less than 0.9 Snellen visual acuity. The implantation of the new mono-EDoF ZOE Primus-HD lens led to improvement in both UDVA and UIVA. Patients with keratometry values less than 44.0D could still benefit from the mono-EDoF lenses. Further studies including wavefront aberrometry are needed to study the interaction between corneal aberrations and EDoF IOLs. Abbreviations: IOL = Intraocular lens, UDVA = Uncorrected distance visual acuity, UIVA = Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, D = Diopters, EDoF = Enhanced Depth of Focus, MF IOL = Multifocal intraocular lens, AUC = area under the curve.
Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight Myopia

Jie Xu,Tianyu Zheng,Yi Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9283021

2020-01-01

Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:Purpose To compare the visual performance and astigmatism tolerance of 3 intraocular lens (IOL) groups: monofocal, bifocal, and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs targeting slight myopia. Methods Overall, there were 60 cataract surgery eyes from 60 patients with implantation of a monofocal, bifocal, or EDOF IOL (20 eyes in each IOL group). The EDOF IOLs targeted slight myopia (−0.25 D to −0.75 D). Intragroup comparison of visual acuity, defocus curve, objective optical quality, contrast sensitivity, visual function questionnaire scores, patients' overall satisfaction, and the astigmatism tolerance was performed 3 months after surgery. Results The EDOF group provided equivalently excellent distance visual outcomes (0.06 ± 0.12) as the monofocal (0.06 ± 0.09) and bifocal (0.03 ± 0.09) groups (P=0.554), better intermediate vision than the other 2 groups (P < 0.05), and similarly satisfactory near visual outcomes (0.23 ± 0.16 at 20 cm, and 0.17 ± 0.14 at 33 cm) as the bifocal group (0.28 ± 0.14 at 20 cm and 0.08 ± 0.10 at 33 cm) (P > 0.05). The contrast sensitivity of EDOF IOL was slightly decreased compared to that of monofocal IOL, but it was better than that of bifocal IOL. The EDOF group showed significantly higher satisfaction than the bifocal group did when preoperative corneal astigmatism was 0.75 D or greater (P=0.009). A significant negative correlation between the corneal astigmatism and patient satisfaction was observed in only the bifocal group. Conclusions The EDOF IOLs targeting slight myopia offered satisfactory visual outcomes at an extended range from far to near distances. The EDOF and monofocal IOLs showed a better tolerance to astigmatism than did the bifocal IOL.
Performance of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Eyes with Preexisting Retinal Disease

Olga Reitblat,David A Velleman,Adi Levy,Ehud I Assia,Guy Kleinmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000540187

2024-07-18

Ophthalmologica

Abstract:Introduction: Extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) offers improved near and intermediate vision, aiming to reduce spectacle dependence in cataract patients. This research aimed to evaluate the performance of EDOF IOL in patients with retinal pathologies following cataract surgery. Methods: The medical charts of thirty-three eyes with retinal pathologies and 100 healthy eyes that underwent cataract extraction with implantation of an EDOF IOL and had at least 3 weeks of postoperative follow-up were retrospectively included. Patients' overall satisfaction, spectacle dependence, visual perception, and side effects were evaluated with a self-reported questionnaire. Results: Mean uncorrected visual acuities (LogMAR) were significantly better in the healthy eyes compared with the eyes with retinal pathologies: 0.05 and 0.10, p = 0.011 (distance), 0.06 and 0.16, p = 0.001 (intermediate), and 0.20 and 0.28, p = 0.026 (near), respectively. No or rare use of spectacles for any distance was reported by 71% and 38% of patients, respectively (p = 0.004). Haloes/glare were reported by 17% and 23%, respectively (p = 0.556); only in 7% and 4% it was clinically disturbing (p > 0.999). The same IOL would be chosen again in 77% and 73% of patients, respectively, (p = 0.550). Conclusion: Patients with retinal pathologies who were implanted with an EDOF IOL demonstrated excellent distant uncorrected visual results with reasonable intermediate and near uncorrected visual results alongside high satisfaction; however, results were inferior to those of the control healthy eyes.
[Outcomes of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses implantation]

K B Pershin,N F Pashinova,A Yu Tsygankov,E A Antonov,I V Kosova,E A Korneeva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414002140

Abstract:Extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) are the latest IOL designs. In recent years, several models of EDOF IOLs have become available in Russia, two of which (Tecnis Symfony and Acrysof IQ Vivity) are implanted in our clinic. Comparative studies devoted to the results of implantation of the new EDOF IOLs are rare in the available literature. Purpose: This article compares the outcomes of implantation of two EDOF IOLs in patients with presbyopia and/or cataract. Material and methods: The prospective study included 60 patients (81 eyes) after implantation of EDOF IOL Tecnis Symfony (32 patients, 45 eyes; group 1) or EDOF IOL AcrySof IQ Vivity (28 patients, 36 eyes; group 2). The mean follow-up period was 3.9±1.3 months. Results: All groups showed a significant (p<0.05) increase in uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), and distance visual acuity (UCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time compared to preoperative values. In group 1, the best corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA) increased from 0.61±0.10 to 0.82±0.16 at the maximum follow-up time, and in group 2 - from 0.58±0.08 to 0.67±0.12 (p>0.05). Both groups showed a significant increase in best corrected intermediate and distance visual acuity (BCIVA and BCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time. The increase in the indicator compared to the preoperative period was not significant in both groups (p>0.05). The frequency of side optical phenomena was low in both groups. No significant differences were found between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: This study presents a comparative analysis of the results of implantation of two different EDOF IOLs. Both lenses were comparable in most of the studied parameters, including providing good distance and intermediate vision, functional near vision, as well as a low frequency of side optical phenomena. In all cases the patients were satisfied with the results of the surgical intervention.
[First experience of implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in patients with glaucoma]

N Yu Gorbunova,R A Yakovlev,N A Pozdeyeva,N O Mikhailov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414003170

Abstract:Purpose: This study evaluates the effectiveness of implantation of extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOL) in patients with cataract and glaucoma. Material and methods: The study included 13 patients (16 eyes) who underwent implantation of the Lentis Comfort EDOF IOL (Teleon Surgical BV, Netherlands). Standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery with IOL implantation was performed in a planned manner after the hypotensive surgery stage in two eyes; a combined procedure was performed in 14 cases. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), near visual acuity, and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with a Maklakov tonometer were assessed preoperatively, on the first day, and 3-6 months after surgery. Computer perimetry using the 30-2 program and spatial contrast sensitivity (SCS) assessment were also performed preoperatively and at the same follow-up time points. Results: On the first day after surgery, UCVA was 0.53±0.65, BCVA was 0.85±0.45. Near UCVA (at 40 cm) was 0.5±0.14 on the first day after surgery and 0.56±0.18 at 3-6 months. According to computer perimetry data, retinal light sensitivity values increased in all patients in the long-term (-3.1±2.9 dB). SCS values increased for objects of all sizes compared to preoperative values. Conclusion: Implantation of EDOF IOL contributes to improved vision without reducing contrast sensitivity and retinal light sensitivity in patients with concomitant cataract and glaucoma.
Performance of a New-Generation Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens-A Prospective Comparative Study

Madhivanan Nivean,Pratheeba Devi Nivean,Jagadeesh Kumar Reddy,Kavithaa Ramamoorthy,Nishanth Madhivanan,Mohan Rajan,Sabyasachi Sengupta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000245

Abstract:Purpose: The aim was to study the visual performance of a new refractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). Design: Prospective, comparative study. Methods: Consenting patients with age-related cataract willing for bilateral cataract surgery within 2 weeks were implanted with the Supraphob EDOF IOL and those willing for 1 eye surgery were implanted with a monofocal IOL. The uncorrected and best-corrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity were evaluated at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. We also inquired about glare, halos, difficulties in night driving, requirement for spectacles, and overall satisfaction with vision. Results: The Supraphob EDOF group (n = 72 eyes) and the monofocal IOL group (n = 54 eyes) were comparable with respect to all preoperative parameters including biometry, visual acuity, and cataract status. The mean age of participants was 58.4 ± 10.6 years. Both groups had similar distance vision but the EDOF group had significantly better intermediate (0.2 ± 0.2 logMAR vs 0.75 ± 0.19 logMAR, P < 0.001) and near vision (median = N6 vs N12, P < 0.001) compared to the monofocal group at 3 months. The contrast sensitivity was similar in both groups. Patients in the EDOF IOL group had much greater satisfaction for intermediate and near vision. Less than 10% patients reported glare, halos, and difficulty in driving at night in the EDOF group. Conclusions: The Supraphob EDOF IOL was effective in improving the distance, intermediate and near vision in majority of patients, and retained good contrast sensitivity with most patients reporting excellent satisfaction.
Visual Performances of a New Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens with a Refractive Design: A Prospective Study After Bilateral Implantation

Leopoldo Spadea,Maria Ilaria Giannico,Martina Formisano,Ludovico Alisi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S320422

2021-07-16

Abstract:Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the visual outcome of a new extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) after bilateral implantation. A qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed and data were compared with those given by other studies regarding multifocal IOLs, which have the same purpose of giving spectacle independence to the patients. Methods: The study enrolled 40 eyes of 20 patients who underwent cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of an EDOF IOL (Evolve Soleko, Rome, Italy). The mean age was 74.5±9 years (range 59-83ys). Refractive outcomes and contrast sensitivity were evaluated preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up. We also examined reading speed, glare, halos, difficulties in the night driving, the requirement for spectacles, and overall satisfaction with vision. Two questionnaires were administered for this purpose. Results: At 6 months, the percentage of eyes within ±0.50 diopters (D) from emmetropia was 82.5%. Of all patients, 90% were satisfied with their vision. The percentage of spectacle-free for near and distance vision patients was 70% and 95%, respectively. A postoperative binocular uncorrected 60cm intermediate visual acuity (UI60VA) of 0.2 logMAR or better was achieved in 92% of patients. Contrast sensitivity significantly improved postoperatively (p<0.001) and mean reading speed was good. Conclusion: This new EDOF IOL seems to provide an effective alternative to patients who desire a spectacle-free lifestyle postoperatively. These lenses can supply a satisfactory distance, intermediate and near vision, and retain good contrast sensitivity, with most patients reporting excellent satisfaction.
Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses: An Update

Piotr Kanclerz,Francesca Toto,Andrzej Grzybowski,Jorge L. Alio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/apo.0000000000000296

2020-05-01

Abstract:Extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) is a new intraocular lens (IOL) technology in the treatment of presbyopia. In contrast to multifocal (MF) IOLs, EDOF lenses create a single elongated focal point, rather than several foci, to enhance depth of focus. In this way, EDOF IOLs aim to reduce photic phenomena, glare, and halos, which have been reported in MF IOLs. A potential disadvantage is a decrease of retinal image quality if the amount of the aberrations is excessively increased. Frequently, EDOF IOLs are combined with MF optical designs; for this reason, EDOF IOLs are commonly a subject of confusion with optical multifocality concepts. The aim of this article is to clarify what an EDOF IOL is and to discuss the recently reported outcomes with these IOLs. We propose naming lenses that have combined optical designs as "hybrid IOLs."

ophthalmology
Visual Function after Implantation of Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima,Yuka Ota,Yoko Taira,Ryo Takemura,Keiichiro Minami

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00801-1

Abstract:Introduction: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the visual functions of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) and monofocal IOLs in eyes with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: Cataractous eyes with POAG controlled using medical treatments, no central visual field defects, and mean deviation (MD) values of -10 dB or better on the 30-2 test grid of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm standard program were included. Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients received EDOF IOLs (ZXR00V and ZXV150-375; J&J), whereas 24 eyes of 24 patients received monofocal IOLs (ZCB00V and ZCV150-375; J&J). MD values, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and photopic contrast sensitivity were measured at 3 months after surgery. Noninferiority of CDVA and contrast sensitivity in eyes with EDOF IOLs to eyes with monofocal IOLs were examined. Results: The postoperative mean MDs of eyes with EDOF and monofocal IOLs were -2.76 dB and -4.21 dB with no significant difference. The CDVA of eyes with EDOF IOLs was noninferior to that of eyes with monofocal IOLs (P = 0.02). There were no inferiority in contrast sensitivity at any spatial frequency (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The visual function of EDOF IOLs in eyes with mild-to-moderate POAG was not inferior to that of monofocal IOLs. Trial registration: Registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Research (identifier: jRCTs032200218).
Visual and clinical outcomes after bilateral implantation of a novel extended depth of focus lens post cataract surgery

Muskaan Bansal,Anchal Thakur,Mohammed Jeshan,Kulbhushan Sachdeva,Chintan Malhotra,Amit Gupta,Arun Jain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_416_24

2024-09-01

Abstract:Purpose: To assess the visual and clinical outcomes after bilateral implantation of the novel extended depth of focus (EDOF) (AcrySof IQ Vivity) intraocular lens (IOL) using a micromonovision strategy. Methods: This was a prospective interventional study at a tertiary care center. Twenty patients (40 eyes) underwent bilateral implantation of AcrySof IQ Vivity IOL. Twelve weeks postoperatively, both uncorrected vision and corrected vision were assessed. Uniocular and binocular defocus curves with and without correction were noted subjectively as well as objectively on I-trace. Contrast sensitivity was assessed with a FACT (Functional Acuity Contrast Testing) machine, and objective parameters like modulation transfer function and Strehl ratio were also measured on I-Trace. Subjective quality of vision using a subjective questionnaire was also evaluated. Results: The mean binocular postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity in LogMAR was -0.03 ± 0.09, the uncorrected intermediate visual acuity was 0.03 ± 0.09, and the uncorrected near visual acuity was 0.28 ± 0.18. All defocus curves were smooth and broad with the uncorrected defocus curve (with the micromonovision strategy) better than the corrected defocus curve. The subjective depth of focus (DOF = 3.73) was more than objective DOF (1.93) (P < 0.05). Photopic contrast was better than mesopic at all frequencies. All aberrations increased at 5 mm pupil size compared to 3 mm pupil size and were statistically significant, except for the total eye spherical aberration, which shows no significant difference at 3 mm and 5 mm pupil size (P = 0.27). Spectacle independence for distance, intermediate, and near was achieved in 100%, 94.7%, and 94.7% cases in this study, respectively. Conclusions: Using the micromonovision strategy, the visual performance of this novel EDOF IOL was outstanding both subjectively and objectively.
Extended depth of focus versus trifocal for intraocular lens implantation: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis

Mohammad Karam,Nahlaa AlKhowaiter,Ali Alkhabbaz,Ahmad AlDubaikhi,Abdulmalik Alsaif,Eiman Shareef,Rand Alazaz,Abdulaziz Alotaibi,Mona Koaik,Samir Jabbour

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15853

2024-01-01

Acta Ophthalmologica

Abstract:Aims/Purpose: To compare the extended depth of focus (EDOF) versus trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients undergoing IOL implantation. Methods: An electronic search was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to include studies comparing EDOF versus trifocal IOLs. Refraction and visual acuity were primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included defocus curves, intraocular aberrations, contrast sensitivity (CS), quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire score, haloes and glare, spectacle independence and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 22 studies enrolling 2200 eyes were identified. Trifocal IOL showed a significant improvement in sphere (mean difference [MD] = −0.23; p = 0.001) and spherical equivalence (MD = −0.11, p = 0.0001) compared to EDOF IOL. No difference was observed in cylinder (MD = −0.03, p = 0.25) or astigmatism. Trifocal IOL had superior near visual acuity outcomes, namely uncorrected near visual acuity (MD = 0.12, p < 0.00001) and distance‐corrected near visual acuity (MD = 0.12, p = 0.002). Post‐operative corrected distance visual acuity (MD = −0.01, p = 0.01) was significantly improved for the EDOF group, although no difference was noted in post‐operative uncorrected distance visual acuity (MD = 0.00, p = 0.84), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (MD = 0.01, p = 0.68) or distance‐corrected intermediate visual acuity (MD = −0.01, p = 0.39). Defocus curve favoured trifocal IOLs at near vision and EDOF IOLs at intermediate vision. Ocular aberration, CS, haloes (odds ratio = 0.64, p = 0.10), glare and patient satisfaction were not statistically significant between the groups. The trifocal IOL was associated with an improved QoV questionnaire score (MD = 1.24, p = 0.03) and spectacle independence (odds ratio = 0.26, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Trifocal IOLs improved uncorrected near visual acuity compared to EDOF IOLs. Uncorrected distance and intermediate visual acuity, halos and glare were not statistically different between both groups.

ophthalmology
Tolerance to refractive error with a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens

Daniel A. Black,Chandra Bala,Aixa Alarcon,Srividhya Vilupuru

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03040-1

IF: 4.4563

2024-04-06

Eye

Abstract:To evaluate the tolerance to refractive errors of a new purely refractive extended depth of focus (EDF) intraocular lens (IOL) using preclinical and clinical metrics.

ophthalmology
Comparison of visual performance between bifocal and extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses

Hitoshi Tabuchi,Hirotaka Tanabe,Tomoki Shirakami,Kosuke Takase,Tomohiro Shojo,Tomofusa Yamauchi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288602

IF: 3.7

2023-07-14

PLoS ONE

Abstract:We compared the visual performance of a bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (ZMB00) and an extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL (ZXR00V) by evaluating postoperative parameters at 10 weeks after the last surgery in cataract patients who underwent bilateral ZMB00 or ZXR00V implantation between 2011 and 2020. The right and left lenses were implanted within 3 months of each other. The study enrolled 1536 eyes of 768 patients; the ZMB00 group comprised 1326 eyes of 663 patients (age: 67.0 ± 7.8 years; female/male, 518/145), and the ZXR00V group comprised 210 eyes of 105 patients (age: 67.8 ± 6.9 years; female/male, 39/66). A linear mixed-effects model using data for both eyes, with strict adjustments for sex, age, subjective refraction spherical equivalent, subjective refraction cylinder, corneal astigmatism, axial length, corneal higher-order aberrations and pupil diameter, ensured statistical validity. Uncorrected near visual acuity, corrected near visual acuity, and near spectacle independence were significantly better in the ZMB00 group (p<0.00068, Wald test) than in the ZXR00V group. Contrast sensitivity (visual angle of the test target: 4.0°/2.5°/1.6°/1.0°/0.7°) and contrast sensitivity with glare (4.0°/2.5°/1.6°/1.0°/0.7°) were significantly better in the ZXR00V group (p<0.00068, Wald test) than in the ZMB00 group. Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, contrast sensitivity with glare (6.3°), and 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) scores for General Vision were slightly but significantly better in the ZXR00V group than in the ZMB00 group (p<0.05, Wald test). At high-performance levels, the two IOL groups had different characteristics regarding various visual performance parameters.

multidisciplinary sciences
Clinical and aberrometric evaluation of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration

Roberto Bellucci,Miriam Cargnoni,Carlo Bellucci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.02.023

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the refractive, visual, and aberrometric results with a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) based on alternating positive and negative spherical aberration in the central 3.0 mm optical zone and an aspheric monofocal IOL of the same platform. Setting: Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Verona, Italy. Design: Prospective case series. Methods: Cataract patients free from other ocular disease had bilateral implantation of the EDOF Mini Well IOL or the monofocal Mini IOL. Four to 6 weeks after second-eye surgery, the refraction, visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and photic symptoms were assessed. Wavefront analysis was performed. The primary endpoint of was the amplitude of the dioptric interval for 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The secondary endpoint was an aberration comparison between the two IOLs. Results: The study comprised two groups of 25 patients each. The corrected distance visual acuity was better with the monofocal IOL by 0.02 logMAR (P = .03). The 0.1 logMAR dioptric interval was 2.0 diopters (D) for the EDOF IOL and 1.0 D for the monofocal IOL (P < .001). The mean CDVA at -2.0 defocus was 0.15 logMAR ± 0.08 (SD) and 0.52 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively (P < .001). There was no difference in contrast sensitivity or photic symptoms. The optical aberrations at 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm aperture diameters were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: The EDOF IOL based on spherical aberration provided greater depth of focus than the aspheric monofocal IOL without increasing optical aberrations and with few photic symptoms.

Extended depth of focus IOL in eyes with different axial myopia and targeted refraction

Fabrication and performance evaluation of a design for an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on an improved sinusoidal profile

The Postoperative Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Trifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Patients with Different Biometric Characteristics

Comparison of Patient Outcomes Following Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparative visual outcomes of EDOF intraocular lens with FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification

Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens

Efficacy and comfort following the implantation of extended depth of focus, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract patients

Presbyopia correction with a new Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens

Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight Myopia

Performance of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Eyes with Preexisting Retinal Disease

[Outcomes of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses implantation]

[First experience of implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in patients with glaucoma]

Performance of a New-Generation Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens-A Prospective Comparative Study

Visual Performances of a New Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens with a Refractive Design: A Prospective Study After Bilateral Implantation

Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses: An Update

Visual Function after Implantation of Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Visual and clinical outcomes after bilateral implantation of a novel extended depth of focus lens post cataract surgery

Extended depth of focus versus trifocal for intraocular lens implantation: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis

Tolerance to refractive error with a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens

Comparison of visual performance between bifocal and extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses

Clinical and aberrometric evaluation of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration