A cautionary tale on the effects of different covariance structures in linear mixed effects modeling of fMRI data

Harm Jan van der Horn,Erik B. Erhardt,Andrew B. Dodd,Upasana Nathaniel,Tracey V. Wick,Jessica R. McQuaid,Sephira G. Ryman,Andrei A. Vakhtin,Timothy B. Meier,Andrew R. Mayer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26699
IF: 4.8
2024-05-11
Human Brain Mapping
Abstract:Differences in whole‐brain activation (at p CS for CONGRUENCY effect) and broader brain regions (CS>UN for GROUP:VISIT) depending on the variance–covariance matrix that was selected. Additional testing indicated that both model fit and estimated standard error were superior for the UN matrix, likely as a result of the modeling of individual terms. In summary, current findings suggest that the interpretation of results from complex designs is highly dependent on the selection of the variance–covariance structure using LME modeling.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,neurosciences,neuroimaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?