Abstract:Introduction: Previous meta-analyses have explored the diagnostic accuracy and safety of computed tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsy of ground-glass opacities (GGOs). However, no research investigated the role of nonsurgical biopsies (including transbronchial approaches). Additionally, studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of GGOs with different characteristics are scarce, with no quantitative assessment published to date. We performed a systematic review to explore the diagnostic accuracy and safety of nonsurgical biopsy for diagnosing GGOs, especially those with higher ground-glass components and smaller nodule sizes. Methods: A thorough literature search of four databases was performed to compile studies evaluating both or either of the diagnostic accuracy and complications of nonsurgical biopsy for GGOs. A bivariate random-effects model and random-effect model were utilized for data synthesis. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Results: Nineteen eligible studies with a total of 1,379 biopsy-sampled lesions were analyzed, of which 1,124 were confirmed to be malignant. Nonsurgical biopsy reported a pooled sensitivity of 0.89, a specificity of 0.99, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 60.3%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of nonsurgical biopsy for diagnosing GGOs according to GGO component were 0.90, 0.99, and 77.2% in pure GGOs; 0.87, 0.99, and 67.2% in GG-predominant lesions; and 0.89, 1.00, and 44.1% in solid-predominant lesions, respectively. Additionally, the diagnostic sensitivity was better in lesions ≥20 mm than in small lesions (0.95 vs. 0.88). Factors that contributed to higher sensitivity were the use of a coaxial needle system and CT fluoroscopy but not the needle gauge. The summary sensitivity of core needle biopsy (CNB) was not significantly higher than fine needle aspiration (FNA) (0.92 vs. 0.84; p = 0.42); however, we found an increased incidence of hemorrhage in CNB compared with FNA (60.9 vs. 14.2%; p = 0.012). Conclusion: Nonsurgical biopsy for diagnosing GGOs shows high sensitivity and specificity with an acceptably low risk of complications. However, negative biopsy results are unreliable in excluding malignancy, necessitating resampling or subsequent follow-up. The applicability of our study is limited due to significant heterogeneity, indirect comparisons, and the paucity of data on bronchoscopic approaches, restricting the generalizability of our findings to patients requiring transbronchial biopsies.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing low-dose versus standard-dose computed tomography-guided lung biopsy

[Safety Analysis of CT-guided Core Needle Lung Biopsy].

Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: a Meta-Analysis

A Meta‐analysis: is Low‐dose Computed Tomography a Superior Method for Risky Lung Cancers Screening Population?

Optimizing lung biopsy procedures: Comparative analysis of diagnostic efficacy and safety in experimental low-dose, conventional low-dose, and standard-dose CT-guided approaches

Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[Screening of Early Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Computed Tomography in High-Risk Populations: a Meta-Analysis].

Solitary Lung Nodule: CT-Guided Transthoracic Biopsy vs Transbronchial Biopsy With Endobronchial Ultrasound and Flexible Bronchoscope, a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Value of circulating tumor cell assisting low-dose computed tomography in screening pulmonary nodules based on existing liquid biopsy techniques: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Effects of low dose computed tomography (LDCT) on lung cancer screening on incidence and mortality in regions with high tuberculosis prevalence: A systematic review

Diagnostic Efficiency and Complication Rate of CT-guided Lung Biopsy: a Single Center Experience of the Procedures Conducted over a 10-Year Period

Comparison between endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy and CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

A Meta Analysis:Low Dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening

Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review to Update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation

C-Arm Cone-Beam CT Virtual Navigation versus Conventional CT Guidance in the Transthoracic Lung Biopsy: A Case-Control Study

Comparison Between Endobronchial‐Guided Transbronchial Biopsy and Computed Tomography–Guided Transthoracic Lung Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Central Pulmonary Lesions

Computed Tomography (CT)-Guided Needle Biopsy of Lung Lesions: A Single Center Experience

Comparison of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy localization and CT-guided percutaneous localization in resection of lung nodules: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Race, age at diagnosis and histological characteristics of lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS) and ever-smokers in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Nonsurgical Biopsy for Diagnosing Pulmonary Ground-Glass Opacities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of a CT-guided transthoracic lung and pleural biopsy - a single-centre experience with own low-dose protocol