From the invisibility of miscarriage to an attribution of life

Jenny Littlewood

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.1999.9964584

1999-08-01

Anthropology and Medicine

Abstract:This paper examines the notion of personhood through existing studies of miscarriage. It explores cross‐culturally how the concept of baby developes. One such example is that ‘a baby’ is a product of ‘Western technology’. Therefore, miscarriage may be viewed as a ‘failure of technology’, and the miscarriage may remain unacknowledged. Alternatively, if miscarriage is not a baby but redefined as ‘a foetus ‘ or a collection of cells, it again becomes invisible as the personhood of the baby has been denied. In the UK since the mid‐1980s, personhood in miscarriage has been acknowledged in research and policy in the context of limited resources or broader definitions of preventive health care, where the notion of life has been debated. In health practice, if one argues that life is continuous rather than having definite points, there are different implications for care. Having fixed points in what is a continuous world may be helpful for legal convenience in delimiting hospital policy, such as policy relating to foetal experimentation, in‐vitro fertilisation, brain death or donor organs, but this may be unhelpful at the practice level in care of the woman, the partners or the family, during the resolution of grief. This may present a conflict for the nurse who in the UK is seen as managing ambiguous states: the re‐entry of the person from a state of sickness or abnormality into the social world. The new age of biologically assisted pregnancy and its loss requires thought about how provision is made taking into account the renegotiated family and kinship patterns that are emerging, and how ‘suspended’ potential life in in‐vitro fertilisation both enhances and despoils life.

anthropology,public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical