On Lev Gordeev's "On P Versus NP"

David Narváez,Patrick Phillips
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.07166
2021-04-14
Computational Complexity
Abstract:In the paper "On P versus NP," Lev Gordeev attempts to extend the method of approximation, which successfully proved exponential lower bounds for monotone circuits, to the case of De Morgan Normal (DMN) circuits. As in Razborov's proof of exponential lower bounds for monotone circuits, Gordeev's work is focused on the NP-complete problem CLIQUE. If successful in proving exponential DMN circuit lower bounds for CLIQUE, Gordeev would prove that P $\neq$ NP. However, we show that Gordeev makes a crucial mistake in Lemma 12. This mistake comes from only approximating operations over positive circuit inputs. Furthermore, we argue that efforts to extend the method of approximation to DMN circuits will need to approximate negated inputs as well.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?