Abstract:We study mechanism design for nonexcludable and excludable binary public project problems. Our aim is to maximize the expected number of consumers and the expected agents' welfare. We first show that for the nonexcludable public project model, there is no need for machine learning based mechanism design. We identify a sufficient condition on the prior distribution for the existing conservative equal costs mechanism to be the optimal strategy-proof and individually rational mechanism. For general distributions, we propose a dynamic program that solves for the optimal mechanism. For the excludable public project model, we identify a similar sufficient condition for the existing serial cost sharing mechanism to be optimal for 2 and 3 agents. We derive a numerical upper bound and use it to show that for several common distributions, the serial cost sharing mechanism is close to optimality. The serial cost sharing mechanism is not optimal in general. We propose three machine learning based approaches for designing better performing mechanisms. We focus on the family of largest unanimous mechanisms , which characterizes all strategy-proof and individually rational mechanisms for the excludable public project model. A largest unanimous mechanism describes an iterative mechanism, which is defined by an exponential number of mechanism parameters. Our first approach describes the largest unanimous mechanism family using a neural network and training is carried out by minimizing a cost function that combines the mechanism design objective and the constraint violation penalty. We interpret the largest unanimous mechanisms as price-oriented rationing-free (PORF) mechanisms, which enables us to move the mechanisms' iterative decision making off the neural network, to a separate simulation process, therefore avoiding the vanishing gradient problem. We also feed the prior distribution's analytical form into the cost function to achieve high-quality gradients for efficient training. Our second approach treats the mechanism design task as a Markov Decision Process with an exponential number of states. During the Markov decision process, the non-consumers are gradually removed from the system. We train multiple neural networks, each for a different number of remaining agents, to learn the optimal value function on the states. Training is carried out by supervised learning toward a set of manually prepared base cases and the Bellman equation. Our third approach is based on reinforcement learning for a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process . Each RL episode randomly draws a type profile, which is hidden from the RL agent (mechanism designer). The RL agent only observes which cost share offers have been accepted under the largest unanimous mechanism under discussion. We use a continuous action space reinforcement learning approach to adjust the offer policy (i.e., adjust mechanism parameters). Lastly, our first two approaches use "supervision to manual mechanisms" as a systematic way for network initialization, which is potentially valuable for machine learning based mechanism design in general.

Approximately Optimal Mechanism Design: Motivation, Examples, and Lessons Learned

Approximately Optimal Mechanism Design

Optimal Mechansim Design and Money Burning

Mechanism Design via Consensus Estimates, Cross Checking, and Profit Extraction

Mechanism Design via Optimal Transport

Optimal Mechanism Design for Single-Minded Agents

Mechanism Design for Value Maximizers

Optimal Mechanisms for Consumer Surplus Maximization

The Complexity of Optimal Mechanism Design

Optimal Mechanism Design with Risk-loving Agents

Optimal Mechanism Design with Speculation and Resale ∗

Sequential Posted Pricing and Multi-parameter Mechanism Design

Behavioral Mechanism Design: Optimal Contests for Simple Agents

Optimal mechanisms with simple menus

Optimal mechanism design with resale via bargaining

Automated Design of Affine Maximizer Mechanisms in Dynamic Settings

Mechanism design for public projects via three machine learning based approaches

Mechanism Design and Risk Aversion

Envy freedom and prior-free mechanism design

Automated Mechanism Design via Neural Networks

Optimal Auctions for Partially Rational Bidders.