Abstract:In the standard Bell scenario, when making a local projective measurement on each system component, the amount of randomness generated is restricted. However, this limitation can be surpassed through the implementation of sequential measurements. Nonetheless, a rigorous definition of random numbers in the context of sequential measurements is yet to be established, except for the lower quantification in device-independent scenarios. In this paper, we provide the definition of quantum intrinsic randomness in sequential measurements and quantify the randomness in the Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu (CGLMP) inequality sequential scenario. Initially, we investigate the quantum intrinsic randomness of the mixed states under sequential projective measurements and the intrinsic randomness of the sequential non-projective measurements under pure states. Naturally, we rigorously define quantum intrinsic randomness under sequential non-projective measurement for arbitrary quantum states. Furthermore, we apply our method to one-Alice and two-Bobs sequential measurement scenarios and quantify the quantum intrinsic randomness of the maximally entangled state and maximally violated state by giving an extremal decomposition. Finally, using the sequential NPA hierarchy in the device-independent scenario, we derive lower bounds on the quantum intrinsic randomness of the maximally entangled state and maximally violated state.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to quantify quantum intrinsic randomness in continuous measurements. Specifically, the paper focuses on the fact that in the standard Bell scenario, when local projection measurements are carried out on each system component, the amount of generated randomness is limited. However, this limit can be surpassed by implementing continuous measurements. Nevertheless, in the device - independent scenario, except for lower - level quantification, the definition of random numbers in continuous measurements has not been established yet.
The main contributions of the paper lie in defining the quantum intrinsic randomness in continuous measurements and quantifying this randomness in the Collins - Gisin - Linden - Massar - Popescu (CGLMP) inequality continuous measurement scenario. The specific steps are as follows:
1. **Continuous Projection Measurements in Mixed States**: First, the quantum intrinsic randomness of mixed states under continuous projection measurements was studied.
2. **Continuous Positive Operator - Valued Measure (POVM) in Pure States**: Next, the intrinsic randomness of pure states under continuous POVM was studied.
3. **Continuous POVM in Arbitrary Quantum States**: Based on the above research, the quantum intrinsic randomness of arbitrary quantum states under continuous POVM was strictly defined.
4. **Application to Specific Scenarios**: The method was applied to the continuous measurement scenario of one Alice and two Bobs, and the quantum intrinsic randomness of the maximally entangled state and the maximally violated state was quantified.
5. **Device - Independent Scenario**: Using the continuous Navascues - Pironio - Acin (NPA) hierarchy, the lower bounds of the quantum intrinsic randomness of the maximally entangled state and the maximally violated state were derived.
### Formula Summary
1. **Conditional Min - Entropy**:
\[
H_{\infty}(\vec{a}\vec{b}|\vec{A}\vec{B}) = -\log_2(p_{\text{guess}})
\]
where \(p_{\text{guess}}\) is the guessing probability.
2. **Classical Guessing Probability**:
\[
p_{\text{guess}}^{\text{C}}(\vec{b}|\vec{y},\rho_s,n,\Pi_{b_i y_i},E)=\max_{p(\lambda),|\phi_\lambda\rangle}\sum_\lambda p(\lambda)\max_{\vec{b}}\langle\phi_\lambda|\Pi_{b_1 y_1}\cdots\Pi_{b_n y_n}\Pi_{b_{n - 1}y_{n - 1}}\cdots\Pi_{b_1 y_1}|\phi_\lambda\rangle
\]
3. **Quantum Guessing Probability**:
\[
p_{\text{guess}}^{\text{Q}}(\vec{b}|\vec{y},\rho_s,n,\Pi_{b_i y_i},E)=\max_{\{\Pi_{\vec{b}}\}}\sum_{\vec{b}}\langle\psi_{SE}|\Pi_{b_1 y_1}\cdots\Pi_{b_n y_n}I_S\otimes\Pi_{\vec{b}}\Pi_{b_n y_n}\cdots\Pi_{b_1 y_1}|\psi_{SE}\rangle
\]
4. **CGLMP Inequality**:
\[
I_d=\left\lfloor\frac{d}{2}-1\right\rfloor\sum_{k = 0}^{d - 1}\left(1-\frac{2k}{d - 1}\right)[f(k)-f(-k - 1)]
\]
where,
\[
f(k)=P(A_1 = B_1 + k)+P(B_1 = A_2 + k + 1)+P(A_2 = B