Abstract:WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Coercive interventions (CI) in emergency psychiatry face increasing criticism, as they can be an emotional, even traumatic event for all persons involved. They are thus considered the last resort. The use of coercive interventions differs widely with regard to type and frequency of measures across different countries and institutions. Individual staff characteristics, such as attitudes towards coercion, may play a vital role in the management of aggression. Little is known about the influence of emotions of staff members on CI, but they are likely to play an important role. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Most staff members surveyed had a rather critical view of coercion and considered it a "necessary evil." Staff members with the most work experience had a more critical view of coercion in comparison with less experienced staff. Nurses rated coercion more positively than did psychiatrists or psychologists. Emotions play an important role in decision-making processes. The current study systematically asked for accompanying emotions during the application of CI and looked for individual differences. A majority of the participants experienced compassion; about half felt helplessness, grief or anxiety. Almost 20% stated that they felt a sense of power. Older staff members more often felt anger or guilt; women felt less power than men did. Nurses felt more desperation than other occupational groups. Staff members consider reflective interventions, such as team supervisions or post-seclusion/restraint debriefings with the patient, as important. Nevertheless, only half reported that these interventions are carried out routinely. Staff members believe that certain risk factors (including stress, low staffing, a fully occupied ward and the presence of particular staff members) enhance the probability of CI. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: To reduce the use of coercive interventions, we recommend that psychiatric teams include highly experienced staff members as work experience has a positive effect on the attitudes towards coercive interventions. Structured post-seclusion/restraint debriefings and team supervisions are considered helpful by staff members and are relatively easy to implement on acute wards. Enhancing staff members' ability to reflect on their own attitudes, emotions and actions is likely to reduce coercive interventions. ABSTRACT: Introduction Little is known about staff attitudes towards coercive interventions (CI) and emotions accompanying these measures. Aim The current study assessed attitudes, views on reflective interventions and accompanying emotions of different occupational groups towards CI, as well as factors, that increase the probability of CI. Method Staff members (N = 138) of a large psychiatric hospital in Germany were assessed using the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) and newly developed items assessing staff members' emotions and views on coercion. Results Experienced staff members were most critical of coercion. Nurses rated coercion significantly more positively than other staff. A majority experienced compassion; about half felt helplessness, grief or anxiety. Almost 20% felt a sense of power. Nurses felt the most desperation. Participants strongly desired reflective measures such as post-seclusion/restraint debriefings with patients. According to staff members, stress on the wards and low staffing increases the probability of CI. Discussion The study assessed accompanying emotions during the application of CI. Attitudes towards coercion and emotions are associated with individual staff characteristics (e.g. profession, work experience). Implications The presence of experienced staff members may help prevent CI. Staff consider reflective interventions helpful in reducing CI.

Specialized short term crisis intervention for patients with personality disorder: Effects on coercion and length of stay

Effectiveness of a peer-supported crisis intervention to reduce the proportion of compulsory admissions in acute psychiatric crisis interventions in an outreach and outpatient setting: study protocol for an exploratory cluster randomised trial combined with qualitative methods

Crisis and acute mental health care for people who have been given a diagnosis of a 'personality disorder': a systematic review

Effect of coercive measures on mental health status in adult psychiatric populations: a nationwide trial emulation

Effects of Patient‐Initiated Brief Admissions on Psychiatric Care Consumption in Borderline Personality Disorder: ARegister‐Based Study

Interventionen bei sich zuspitzenden Krisensituationen in der stationären akutpsychiatrischen Behandlung – Ergebnisse einer inhaltsanalytischen Auswertung von Behandlungsvereinbarungen

Evaluating Adolescent Patient Outcomes and Staff Member Injuries at a General Psychiatric Inpatient Unit

[Crisis Cards for the Prevention of Compulsory Hospitalization]

Coercion in psychiatry: A cross-sectional study on staff views and emotions

Children and adolescents at risk for seclusion and restraint in inpatient psychiatric treatment: a case control study

Risk factors for coercion length at psychiatric hospitals in Israel: Relationship with staff

Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicidal Inpatients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Impact of personality psychopathology on outcome in short-term cognitive-behavioral therapy for Axis I disorders

The effect of psychiatric decision unit services on inpatient admissions and mental health presentations in emergency departments: an interrupted time series analysis from two cities and one rural area in England

Short-Term Cognitive Behavioral Partial Hospital Treatment: A Pilot Study

Evaluation of Psychiatric High and Intensive Care (EPHIC-study): monitoring innovative care from a value-based approach

Exploring personality correlates of psychiatric hospitalization: A cross-sectional comparison of section ii personality disorder model and alternative model for personality disorders.

Effects of inpatient, residential, and day-patient treatment on obsessive–compulsive symptoms in persons with obsessive–compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Impact of Crisis Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness And/Or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review

Effectiveness of nursing intervention in short-term hospitalization for patients suffered from borderline personality disorder and self-harm. A narrative literature review