Interobserver variability in cytopathology: How much do we agree?

Gennaro Acanfora,Anna Maria Carillo,Filippo Dello Iacovo,Maria Salatiello,Pasquale Pisapia,Claudio Bellevicine,Giancarlo Troncone,Elena Vigliar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.13378
2024-03-29
Cytopathology
Abstract:Despite a growing number of diagnostic categorization systems for the reporting of cytologic material have established the criteria and terminology to improve interobserver variability, the cytopathological interpretation of indeterminate cases remains challenging. Interobserver variability remains a major challenge for cytopathologists despite the development of standardized reporting and classification systems. Indeed, whereas moderate‐to‐good interobserver agreement is generally achievable when the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant entities is straightforward, high levels of variability make the diagnostic interpretation of atypical and suspicious samples not consistent. This review explores the landscape of interobserver agreement in cytopathology across different anatomical sites.
pathology,cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?