Triterpenoids with multi-skeletons as 11 β -HSD1 inhibitors from Euphorbia sikkimensis

Chu-Hong Fang,Yu-Peng Li,Ying Li,Jian-Min Yue,Jie Bao,Jin-Hai Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2023.113684
IF: 3.8
2023-04-27
Phytochemistry
Abstract:An exploration for 11 β -HSD1 inhibitors from the whole plant of Euphorbia sikkimensis led to the identification of 10 undescribed triterpenoids 1 − 10 , as well as 7 known triterpenoids ( 11 − 17 ). Their structures were determined by a combination of spectrum elucidations, conformational analyses and quantum chemical calculations. (23 E )-25-methoxy-eupha-14,23-diene-3 β ,7 α -diol ( 1 ) and (23 E )-3 β -dihydroxy-27-noreupha-7,23-diene-25-one ( 2 ) are two rare cases that feature a rearrangement of Me-30 (14 → 8) and a degradation of Me-27, respectively, in the euphane-type triterpenoid family. It is an interesting phenomenon that (23 E )-3 β -hydroxy-25-methoxy-eupha-8,23-diene-7-one ( 4 ) and (23 E )-3 β -hydroxy-25-methoxy-lanost-8,23-diene-7-one ( 5 ) coexist in the same plant, sharing the same planar structure but belonging to different structural types of triterpenoids. Compounds 3 − 5 and 14 show significant inhibitory activity against 11 β -HSD1 with IC 50 values of 6.50 ± 0.22, 1.31 ± 0.34, 9.38 ± 0.64, and 8.27 ± 0.33 μM, respectively. The structure-activity relationship study shows that the euphane-type triterpenoids exhibit the best inhibitory activity, which is in accord with the fact of the euphane-type triterpenoids having the best ability to bind to the active pocket of 11 β -HSD1 in the molecular docking experiments.
biochemistry & molecular biology,plant sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?