UK workers during the pandemic: inadequate protection and, consequently, increased risk

Raymond M Agius
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q508
2024-03-02
BMJ
Abstract:There are striking similarities, as well as differences, between the shortcomings in protection and consequent increased risk to UK and US workers during the covid-19 pandemic.1Extant UK law should have served well during this time. Instead of striving to fulfil their legal duty, however, many UK employers opted merely for "public health guidance," which explicitly did not commit to fulfilling health and safety statute.2Public health authorities both in the US1 and the UK were mistaken in clinging to "droplet dogma" rather than recommending respirators as personal protective equipment (PPE) for exposed workers.3 While the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration "held different views ... to protect frontline workers, particularly those in healthcare facilities,"1 the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) merely endorsed Public Health England guidance as "effective control measures."4 Since HSE held back from publishing specific guidance on the protection of healthcare workers, trade unions had to produce their...
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?