Investor sentiment and stock returns: Global evidence

Wenzhao Wang,Chen Su,Darren Duxbury
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.07.010
IF: 3.025
2021-09-01
Journal of Empirical Finance
Abstract:<p>We assess the impact of investor sentiment on future stock returns in 50 global stock markets. Using the consumer confidence index (CCI) as the sentiment proxy, we document a negative relationship between investor sentiment and future stock returns at the global level. While the separation between developed and emerging markets does not disrupt the negative pattern, investor sentiment has a more instant impact in emerging markets, but a more enduring impact in developed markets. Individual stock markets reveal heterogeneity in the sentiment-return relationship. This heterogeneity can be explained by cross-market differences in culture and institutions, along with intelligence and education, to varying degrees influenced by the extent of individual investor market participation.</p>
economics,business, finance
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the impact of investor sentiment on future stock returns and provide evidence on a global scale. Specifically, the author uses the Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) as a proxy variable for investor sentiment and studies the relationship between investor sentiment and future stock returns in 50 global stock markets. The following are the main problems and objectives of this study: 1. **The relationship between investor sentiment and stock returns on a global scale**: - The author attempts to verify whether investor sentiment has an impact on stock returns on a global scale. By analyzing 50 global stock markets, including 24 developed markets and 26 emerging markets, the author hopes to confirm whether this relationship is普遍存在 in different types of markets. 2. **Comparison between developed markets and emerging markets**: - The researchers further divide the sample into developed markets and emerging markets to compare whether there are differences in the impact of investor sentiment on stock returns in these two types of markets. They find that although both types of markets show a negative correlation, the impact of investor sentiment in emerging markets is more immediate, while the impact in developed markets is more persistent. 3. **Explanation of cross - market heterogeneity**: - The author also attempts to explain the heterogeneity of the relationship between investor sentiment and stock returns among different markets. They believe that this heterogeneity may be caused by differences in factors such as culture, market institutions, education, and intelligence. Through the analysis of these factors, the researchers hope to more comprehensively understand the mechanism of the impact of investor sentiment on stock returns. 4. **The role of culture and institutions**: - The article pays special attention to the impact of culture and market institutions on the relationship between investor sentiment and stock returns. The author points out that differences in culture and market institutions may lead to differences in investor behavior, which in turn affect the role of investor sentiment on stock returns. 5. **Policy recommendations**: - Finally, based on the research results, the author puts forward some suggestions, such as improving market institutions to mitigate the impact of investor sentiment on stock returns. In summary, this paper aims to deeply explore the impact of investor sentiment on future stock returns through global research and identify the key factors affecting this relationship. This not only helps to understand the role of investor sentiment in different markets but also provides valuable reference information for global investors. ### Key formula The DSSW model mentioned in the paper is used to describe the price rule of unsafe assets, and its formula is: \[ p_t=\frac{1 + \mu (\rho_t-\rho^*)}{1 + r+\mu \rho^*}\cdot\frac{r-(2\gamma)\mu^2\sigma_\rho^2}{r(1 + r)^2} \] where: - \( p_t \) is the price of unsafe assets in period \( t \); - \( \mu \) is the proportion of noise traders; - \( r \) is the risk - free interest rate; - \( \gamma \) is the degree of absolute risk aversion; - \( \rho_t\sim N(\rho^*, \sigma_\rho^2) \) is the misjudgment of the expected price, which follows a normal distribution. This formula shows how the misjudgment of noise traders affects the price of unsafe assets, thereby affecting stock returns.