Abstract:Abstract Background The microbiota presents a compartmentalized distribution across different gut segments. Hence, the exogenous microbiota from a particular gut segment might only invade its homologous gut location during microbiota transplantation. Feces as the excreted residue contain most of the large-intestinal microbes but lack small-intestinal microbes. We speculated that whole-intestinal microbiota transplantation (WIMT), comprising jejunal, ileal, cecal, and colonic microbiota, would be more effective for reshaping the entire intestinal microbiota than conventional fecal microbiota transplantation fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Results We modeled the compartmentalized colonization of the gut microbiota via transplanting the microbiota from jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon, respectively, into the germ-free mice. Transplanting jejunal or ileal microbiota induced more exogenous microbes’ colonization in the small intestine (SI) of germ-free mice rather than the large intestine (LI), primarily containing Proteobacteria, Lactobacillaceae, and Cyanobacteria. Conversely, more saccharolytic anaerobes from exogenous cecal or colonic microbiota, such as Bacteroidetes, Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Ruminococcaceae, established in the LI of germ-free mice that received corresponding intestinal segmented microbiota transplantation. Consistent compartmentalized colonization patterns of microbial functions in the intestine of germ-free mice were also observed. Genes related to nucleotide metabolism, genetic information processing, and replication and repair were primarily enriched in small-intestinal communities, whereas genes associated with the metabolism of essential nutrients such as carbohydrates, amino acids, cofactors, and vitamins were mainly enriched in large-intestinal communities of germ-free mice. Subsequently, we compared the difference in reshaping the community structure of germ-free mice between FMT and WIMT. FMT mainly transferred LI-derived microorganisms and gene functions into the recipient intestine with sparse SI-derived microbes successfully transplanted. However, WIMT introduced more SI-derived microbes and associated microbial functions to the recipient intestine than FMT. Besides, WIMT also improved intestinal morphological development as well as reduced systematic inflammation responses of recipients compared with FMT. Conclusions Segmented exogenous microbiota transplantation proved the spatial heterogeneity of bacterial colonization along the gastrointestinal tract, i.e., the microbiota from one specific location selectively colonizes its homologous gut region. Given the lack of exogenous small-intestinal microbes during FMT, WIMT may be a promising alternative for conventional FMT to reconstitute the microbiota across the entire intestinal tract.

Segmental patterning of microbiota and immune cells in the murine intestinal tract

Host innate and adaptive immunity shapes the gut microbiota biogeography

Regional Cell Atlas of Human Intestine Shapes Distinct Immune Surveillance

Microbiota-mediated Shaping of Mouse Spleen Structure and Immune Function Characterized by Scrna-Seq and Stereo-seq.

The Interplay between Nutrition, Innate Immunity, and the Commensal Microbiota in Adaptive Intestinal Morphogenesis

Organization of the human intestine at single-cell resolution

A dynamic atlas of immunocyte migration from the gut

Spatial Characteristics of Colonic Mucosa-Associated Gut Microbiota in Humans

Spatial heterogeneity of bacterial colonization across different gut segments following inter-species microbiota transplantation

Intestinal Flora and Disease Mutually Shape the Regional Immune System in the Intestinal Tract.

Use of gnotobiotic mice to identify and characterize key microbes responsible for the development of the intestinal immune system

Insights into Immune Homeostasis and Neuro-Immune Interactions

A single cell survey of the microbial impacts on the mouse small intestinal epithelium

Cells of the human intestinal tract mapped across space and time

Induction of Intestinal Th17 Cells by Segmented Filamentous Bacteria

Geographic Differences in Gut Microbiota Composition Impact Susceptibility to Enteric Infection

Gastro-intestinal tract: The leading role of mucosal immunity

Heterogeneity of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+Treg TCR β CDR3 Repertoire Based on the Differences of Symbiotic Microorganisms in the Gut of Mice

Epithelial zonation along the mouse and human small intestine defines five discrete metabolic domains

Immune niches orchestrated by intestinal mesenchymal stromal cells lining the crypt-villus

Regulation of thymic T-cell development by intestinal microbiota