Impacts of coordination modes (chelate versus bridge) of PNP-diphosphine ligands on the redox and electrocatalytic properties of diiron oxadithiolate complexes for proton reduction

Pei-Hua Zhao,Meng-Yuan Hu,Jian-Rong Li,Yan-Zhong Wang,Bao-Ping Lu,Hong-Fei Han,Xu-Feng Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136615
IF: 6.6
2020-09-01
Electrochimica Acta
Abstract:<p>As diiron subsite models of [FeFe]-hydrogenases with odt bridge, two new series of PNP-chelate or -bridge diiron oxadithiolate complexes Fe<sub>2</sub>(<em>μ</em>-odt)(CO)<sub>4</sub>{(Ph<sub>2</sub>P)<sub>2</sub>NR} (<strong>1</strong>–<strong>3</strong> and <strong>4</strong>–<strong>6</strong>) were prepared by selective substitutions of diiron hexacarbonyl complex Fe<sub>2</sub>(<em>μ</em>-odt)(CO)<sub>6</sub> (<strong>A</strong>, odt = SCH<sub>2</sub>OCH<sub>2</sub>S) with different PNP ligands (PNP = (Ph<sub>2</sub>P)<sub>2</sub>NR, R = (CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>Me, (CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>NMe<sub>2</sub> and (CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>Si(OEt)<sub>3</sub>). All the new model complexes have been fully characterized by elemental analysis, various spectroscopies, and particularly for <strong>1</strong> and <strong>4</strong>–<strong>6</strong> by X-ray crystallography. In order to investigate the influence of coordination modes (chelate <em>vs.</em> bridge) of PNP ligands on redox and electrocatalytic properties of diiron model complexes for proton reduction, the protonation and electrochemistry of <strong>1</strong> and <strong>4</strong> as a pair of representative counterparts are well studied and compared in the absence and presence of strong acid (CF<sub>3</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>H) and weak acid (CH<sub>3</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>H) as different proton sources by using <em>in situ</em> IR and NMR spectroscopies as well as cyclic voltammetry (CV). For example, the protonation studies have shown that i) with excess CF<sub>3</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>H, protonations of both <strong>1</strong> and <strong>4</strong> are able to form the respective hydride species <strong>1(<em>μ</em>H)</strong><sup><strong>+</strong></sup> and <strong>4(<em>μ</em>H)</strong><sup><strong>+</strong></sup>, but in which the former is completely protonated whereas the latter is less reactive; and ii) with excess CH<sub>3</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>H, complex <strong>1</strong> is unactive yet counterpart <strong>4</strong> is partially protonated to afford species <strong>4(<em>μ</em>H)</strong><sup><strong>+</strong></sup>. The electrochemical investigations have displayed that i) with CF<sub>3</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>H as a proton source, complex <strong>1</strong> has a very simliar turnover frequency (TOF) and a much lower overpotential for cataytic proton reduction to H<sub>2</sub> in comparison to <strong>4</strong>; and ii) with CH<sub>3</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>H as a proton source, complex <strong>1</strong> shows a much greater TOF value and a closer overpotential for H<sub>2</sub> evolution in contrast to <strong>4</strong>.</p>
electrochemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?