Comparative Performance of ARIMA and ARCH/GARCH Models on Time Series of Daily Equity Prices for Large Companies

John J. Sparks,Y. Yurova
Abstract:This study provides a comparison of the performance of out-of-sample forecasts from ARMA vs. ARCH/GARCH models, especially relative to the utility of the non-constant estimate of the volatility provided by ARCH/GARCH methods. 31 large company stocks were selected and their daily log returns computed for a 10-year time period. ARIMA and a variety of ARCH/GARCH models were run against these log daily returns. The forecasts were analyzed using magnitude measures and a rough distributional measure. Analysis of the results showed that for one-step ahead forecasts ARCH/GARCH models outperform ARIMA models in modeling financial time series in terms of the most applied measure—the MAPD (mean absolute percentage deviation). Relative to the measures which accounted for the non-constant volatility estimate provided by ARCH/GARCH models, we saw that the mediocre performance of ARIMA on the MASE (mean absolute standardized error) measure came at a great expense in terms of the normality of the residuals. Therefore in the confines of this experiment ARIMA did not provide point estimates that were as accurate and that did not produce a relatively normal distribution of residuals.
Business,Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?