Deepening regional disparities in primary health care during COVID-19 in South Korea

Hyun-Young Jin,Jongwng Ju,Jin,Ju

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22605/rrh8612

2024-01-22

Rural and Remote Health

Abstract:RRH: Rural and Remote Health. Published article number: 8612 - Deepening regional disparities in primary health care during COVID-19 in South Korea

public, environmental & occupational health

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Worsening of health disparities across COVID-19 pandemic stages in Korea

Hyejin Lee,Hyunwoo Nam,Jae-Ryun Lee,Hyemin Jung,Jin Yong Lee,Jae-ryun Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2024038

2024-03-13

Epidemiology and Health

Abstract:Objectives: With the end of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the health outcomes of this disease in Korea must be examined. We aimed to investigate health outcomes and disparities linked to socioeconomic status during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea and to identify risk factors for hospitalization and mortality.Methods: This nationwide retrospective study incorporated an analysis of individuals with and without COVID-19 in Korea between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. The study period was divided into 4 stages. Prevalence, hospitalization, mortality, and case-fatality rates were calculated per 100,000 population. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality.Results: Overall, the incidence rate was 40,601 per 100,000 population, the mortality rate was 105 per 100,000 population, and the case-fatality rate was 259 per 100,000 cases. A total of 12,577,367 new cases (24.5%) were recorded in stage 3 and 8,979,635 cases (17.5%) in stage 4. Medical Aid recipients displayed the lowest 3-year cumulative incidence rate (32,737 per 100,000) but the highest hospitalization (5,663 cases per 100,000), mortality (498 per 100,000), and case-fatality (1521 per 100,000) rates. Male sex, older age, lower economic status, non-metropolitan area of residence, high Charlson comorbidity index, and disability were associated with higher risk of hospitalization and death. Vaccination was found to reduce mortality risk.Conclusion: As the pandemic progressed, surges were observed in incidence, hospitalization, and mortality, exacerbating disparities associated with economic status and disability. Nevertheless, Korea has maintained a low case-fatality rate across all economic groups.

public, environmental & occupational health
Regional inequalities in excess mortality and its community determinants during the early COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea

Eunah Kim,Woojoo Lee,Sung-Il Cho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2023-221763

2024-08-27

Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

Abstract:Background Excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic provides a comprehensive measure of disease burden, and its local variation highlights regional health inequalities. We investigated local excess mortality in 2020 and its determinants at the community level. Methods We collected data from 250 districts in South Korea, including monthly all-cause mortality for 2015–2020 and community characteristics from 2019. Excess mortality rate was defined as the difference between observed and expected mortality rates. A Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average model was applied to predict the expected rates for each district. Penalized regression methods were used to derive relevant community predictors of excess mortality based on the elastic net. Results In 2020, South Korea exhibited significant variation in excess mortality rates across 250 districts, ranging from no excess deaths in 46 districts to more than 100 excess deaths per 100 000 residents in 30 districts. Economic status or the number of medical centres in the community did not correlate with excess mortality rates. The risk was higher in ageing, remote communities with limited cultural and sports infrastructure, a higher density of welfare facilities, and a higher prevalence of hypertension. Physical distancing policies and active social engagement in voluntary activities protected from excess mortality. Conclusion Substantial regional disparities in excess mortality existed within South Korea during the early stages of COVID-19 pandemic. Weaker segments of the community were more vulnerable. Local governments should refine their preparedness for future novel infectious disease outbreaks, considering community circumstances.

public, environmental & occupational health
Interaction effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and regional deprivation on self-rated health: a cross-sectional study

Hajae Jeon,Junbok Lee,Mingee Choi,Bomgyeol Kim,Sang Gyu Lee,Jaeyong Shin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19814-x

IF: 4.5

2024-09-02

BMC Public Health

Abstract:Background: Recent studies have attempted to analyze the changes in self-rated health (SRH) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the results have been inconsistent. Notably, SRH is subjective, and responses may vary across and within countries because of sociocultural differences. Thus, we aimed to examine whether the interaction effects between the COVID-19 pandemic and regional deprivation influenced SRH in South Korea. Methods: The study population comprised 877,778 participants from the Korea Community Health Survey. The data were collected from 2018 to 2021. Multiple regression analysis was employed to determine the relationship between SRH and the interaction between the COVID-19 pandemic status and the socioeconomic level of residential areas. Results: The post-pandemic groups (odds ratio [OR] = 2.25, P < .0001; OR = 2.29, P < .0001) had significantly higher odds of reporting favorable SRH than the pre-pandemic groups (OR = 0.96, P < .0001). However, the difference in ORs based on regional socioeconomic status was small. Conclusions: SRH showed an overall increase in the post-pandemic groups relative to that in the disadvantaged pre-pandemic group. Possible reasons include changes in individuals' health perceptions through social comparison and the effective implementation of COVID-19 containment measures in South Korea. This paradoxical phenomenon has been named the "Eye of the Hurricane," as the vast majority of people who had not been infected by the virus may have viewed their health situation more favorably than they ordinarily would.
Association between household income and mental health among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea: Insights from a community health survey

Min Hui Moon,Min Hyeok Choi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289230

IF: 3.7

2024-04-11

PLoS ONE

Abstract:People of low socioeconomic status are vulnerable to health problems during disasters such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Using data from the 2019 and 2021 Korea Community Health Survey, this study analyzed the associations between Korean adults’ mental health and their national and regional-level household incomes during the pandemic. The prevalence of perceived stress and depression experience for each risk factor category was calculated through univariate analyses. A multivariate logistic regression analysis helped identify the association between two types of income levels (national or regional) and perceived stress and experience of depression. Additionally, we investigated the effect of income levels by subgroup (gender and residential area) on perceived stress and the experience of depression. During the pandemic, the crude prevalence of an experience of depression was higher (6.24% to 7.2%) but that of perceived stress remained unchanged. Regarding regional-income based mental health disparities, even after adjusting for each independent variable, perceived stress (2019 odds ratio (OR): 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.26–1.27, 2021 OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.32–1.32) and experience of depression (2019 OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.55–1.56, 2021 OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.63–1.64) increased as the income level decreased. The perceived stress based on the two income levels was higher in women than in men. For both income levels, the experience of depression of women was higher than that of men before COVID-19 and vice versa during the COVID-19 period. National income had a more pronounced effect on mental health in urban areas than in rural areas. Contrarily, the effect of regional income level on mental health was not consistent across residential areas (urban and rural areas). Our findings demonstrated that mental health disparities based on income level were more likely to occur during the COVID-19 pandemic and are better reflected through disparities in regional income levels.

multidisciplinary sciences
Regional Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Screening

Jongho Park,Yeaeun Kim,Jae-Hyun Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10105395241282981

2024-09-30

Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health

Abstract:Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, Ahead of Print. Cancer screening is the most cost-effective prevention strategy that enables improved cancer mortality and morbidity rates. However, there was a significant decline in cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. This study aimed to measure regional differences in cancer screening by comparing screening rates before and during COVID-19 and to examine factors explaining the regional difference in cancer screening. All variables including the differences in cancer screening rate before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were collected from 229 administrative subregions in South Korea and joined with each community in ArcGIS environment. Factors explaining regional difference in cancer screening were analyzed through descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and interactive decision tree modeling. Cancer screening rates decreased in all regions during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea. The findings revealed that national health insurance premiums, the number of cancer screening facilities, livelihood benefit recipients, and the population aged 65+ could be classified as variables highly affecting the decrease in cancer screening rate. These findings highlight the efforts to appraise different barriers to cancer screening in each community. In addition, it is important to promote sustainable cancer screening strategies from regional perspectives based on regional vulnerabilities and their complex impact on cancer screening.

public, environmental & occupational health
Avoidance of Healthcare Utilization in South Korea during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

Minjung Lee,Myoungsoon You

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084363

IF: 4.614

2021-04-20

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:Avoidance of healthcare utilization among the general population during pandemic outbreaks has been observed and it can lead to a negative impact on population health. The object of this study is to examine the influence of socio-demographic and health-related factors on the avoidance of healthcare utilization during the global outbreak of a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in 2020. Data were collected through an online survey four weeks after the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) confirmed the first case in South Korea; 1000 subjects were included in the analysis. The logit model for regression was used to analyze the associations between sociodemographic and health-related factors regarding the avoidance of healthcare utilization. Among the participants, 73.2% avoided healthcare utilization, and there was no significant difference in the prevalence of healthcare avoidance between groups with (72.0%) and without (74.9%) an underlying disease. Sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., gender, age, income level, and residential area) were related to healthcare avoidance. Among the investigated influencing factors, residential areas highly affected by COVID-19 (i.e., Daegu/Gyeoungbuk region) had the most significant effect on healthcare avoidance. This study found a high prevalence of healthcare avoidance among the general population who under-utilized healthcare resources during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the results reveal that not all societal groups share the burden of healthcare avoidance equally, with it disproportionately affecting those with certain sociodemographic characteristics. This study can inform healthcare under-utilization patterns during emerging infectious disease outbreaks and provide information to public health emergency management for implementing strategies necessary to improve the preparedness of the healthcare system.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
Challenges in Care for Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe Chronic Illnesses during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers Working around Acute Care Hospitals in South Korea

Yejin Kim,Jeong Mi Shin,Shin Hye Yoo,Bhumsuk Keam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040611

2023-02-19

Health Care

Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 epidemic has afflicted patients with severe chronic illnesses who need continuous care between home and hospitals. This qualitative study examines the experiences and challenges of healthcare providers around acute care hospitals who have cared for patients with severe chronic illness in non-COVID-19 situations during the pandemic. Methods: Eight healthcare providers, who work in various healthcare settings around acute care hospitals and frequently care for non-COVID-19 patients with severe chronic illnesses, were recruited using purposive sampling from September to October 2021 in South Korea. The interviews were subjected to thematic analysis. Results: Four overarching themes were identified: (1) deterioration in the quality of care at various settings; (2) new emerging systemic problems; (3) healthcare providers holding on but reaching their limit; and (4) a decline in the quality of life of patients at the end of their lives, and their caregivers. Conclusion: Healthcare providers of non-COVID-19 patients with severe chronic illnesses reported that the quality of care was declining due to the structural problems of the healthcare system and policies centered solely on the prevention and control of COVID-19. Systematic solutions are needed for appropriate and seamless care for non-infected patients with severe chronic illness in the pandemic.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Socioeconomic Disparity and Risk of COVID-19 in South Korea: An NHIS-COVID-19 Database Cohort Study

Tak Kyu Oh,Jae-Wook Choi,In-Ae Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3684419

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Background: The relationship between socioeconomic status and risk of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate whether socioeconomic status affected the risk of COVID-19 in the South Korean population.Methods: The NHIS-COVID-19 database cohort was used in this population-based study. We collected data of COVID-19 patients who were diagnosed between January 1, 2020 and June 26, 2020 and those of the control population. The income levels of all individuals as of February 2020 were extracted and classified into four groups based on quartile ratios: Q1 (the lowest) to Q4 (the highest).Findings: In total, 122,040 individuals—7,669 and 114,371 in the COVID-19 and control populations, respectively—were included in the final analysis. Multivariable logistic regression model showed that the Q1 group had a 1.19-fold higher risk of COVID-19 than the Q4 group, whereas the Q2 and Q3 groups showed no significant differences. In the 20-39-year-old group, compared with the Q4 group, the Q3 and Q2 groups showed 11% and 22% lower risks of COVID-19, respectively. In the ≥60-year-old group, compared with the Q4 group, the Q1, Q2, and Q3 groups showed 1.39-fold, 1.29-fold, and 1.14-fold higher risks of COVID-19, respectively.Interpretation: Lower socioeconomic status was associated with a higher risk of contracting COVID-19 in South Korea. This association was more evident in the older population (≥60-year-old), whereas both lower and higher socioeconomic status were associated with higher risks of contracting COVID-19 in the young adult population (20-39-year-old). Funding: NoneDeclaration of Interests: None declared.Ethics Approval Statement: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (X-2004-604-905) and the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (NHIS-2020-1- 291). Informed consent was waived because the data analyses were performed retrospectively using anonymized data derived from the South Korean NHIS database.
Antenatal care inequalities in South Korea: An analysis of health insurance claims data (2013–2022) in a high‐resource, high‐use country

Saerom Kim,Chanki Kim,Jin‐Hwan Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15459

2024-03-19

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract:Objective This aim of the present study was to explore inequalities in antenatal care (ANC) in South Korea. Based on the guidelines of the WHO, we categorized less than eight visits to an obstetrical facility as insufficient ANC. We examined ANC inequalities associated with age, disability, nationality, income, and geographic accessibility. Methods We extracted delivery event claimed from 2013 to 2022 from the National Health Insurance Service database. By tracing back 270 days from the delivery date, we counted the number of antenatal visits for each childbirth and calculated the proportion of women with insufficient ANC and assessed both absolute and relative inequalities for each population group. The logistic regression analysis for both underuse and overuse of ANC were conducted. Results Out of 3 416 517 childbirths, 104 109 women (3.0%) had fewer than eight ANC visits. Although the average number of ANC visits reached 18.7 in 2022, significant inequalities persisted across different population groups. The insufficient ANC rate was 28.1% for teenage women, 6.4% for disabled women, 10.7% for non‐Korean women, and 15.2% for dependents of medical aid households. Women with low income and those living in obstetric care underserved areas also exhibited higher ANC insufficiency. From 2021 to 2022, sufficiency in ANC decreased for teenage, disabled, and non‐Korean women, highlighting the effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Conclusion Antenatal care inequalities are evident in South Korea's well‐resourced health system. There is a need for further investigation into these disparities and the qualitative aspects of maternity care services.

obstetrics & gynecology
A nationwide survey on the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and respiratory disease in South Korea

Lin Ang,Mi Hong Yim,Eunhye Song,Hye Won Lee,Hyangsook Lee,Tae-Hun Kim,Merlin Willcox,Xiao-Yang Hu,Joelle Houriet,Bertrand Graz,Je-Won Lee,Yunho Jang,Jung Tae Kim,Eunsop Kim,Yong Hee Park,Myeong Soo Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.965651

2022-09-23

Abstract:Background: This study aimed to explore individual prevalence of respiratory symptoms and to describe the Korean population's treatment approaches, preventive health behaviors, and mental health conditions during the pandemic. Methods: We analyzed responses from an online nationwide survey, conducted between February 2021 to May 2021, about people's experiences during the pandemic. Statistical analysis was also performed to see if there were any significant differences in treatment and prevention strategies between different groups of respondents (between those had respiratory symptoms, compared with those who did not, and between those tested positive for COVID-19, compared with those who did not). Results: A total of 2,177 survey respondents completed the survey and, of these, only 142 had experienced symptoms. The most frequently reported respiratory infections related symptoms were runny or blocked nose (47.6%), cough (45.5%), fever (44.1%), sore throat (42.0%), and fatigue (30.1%). More than half of the respondents (53.1%) used complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) approaches as means of preventive measures. In terms of preventive behaviors, the more emphasized behaviors were mask-wearing (58.9%) and hand-washing after coming home (42.7%). The majority of the respondents (64.9%) did not show signs of mental health issues. Conclusion: In South Korea, conventional medicine was mainly used for COVID-19 treatment whereas CAM was commonly used as preventive measures. COVID-19 was also found to have less impact on the general population's mental health. The findings of this study may shed light on how the pandemic impacted the general population.
Perceived social support and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationally-representative study

Yeong Jun Ju,Woorim Kim,Soon Young Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640211066737

2022-02-01

International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and the associated containment policies have led to negative mental health consequences in the general population. Aims: This study investigated the association between perceived social support and depressive symptoms in Korea. Methods: Data from the Korea Community Health Survey conducted from August to November 2020 was used for this cross-sectional study. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and perceived social support was assessed based on the number of contacts that participants had identified as being available in case participants needed isolation due to COVID-19 exposure. This study included the general adult populations aged 19 years and older. The relationship between the perceived social support and depressive symptoms was analyzed using multivariable liner regression analysis. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on income. Results: Analysis of the data obtained from 225,453 participants indicated that PHQ-9 scores were highest in the group with ‘no’ perceived social support, followed by ‘low’, ‘middle’, and ‘high’ perceived levels of social support. Compared to individuals with ‘high’ perceived social support, those with ‘middle’ (β: .10, p-value <.001), ‘low (β: .07, p-value .010), and ‘no’ (β: .34, p-value <.001) perceived levels of social support showed poorer depression scores. The magnitude of the relationship found was particularly strong in the low-income group. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals’ depression scores varied according to their perceived level of social support. Strategies that address the need of vulnerable individuals are required to reduce the potentially negative mental health consequences of the pandemic.

psychiatry
Rising Mental Health Issues from Remote Work Challenges in South Korea Amid COVID-19

J H Sim,B Y Yun,H J Park,J Y Oh,J H Yoon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.2208

2024-10-28

European Journal of Public Health

Abstract:Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased remote work, raising concerns about its impact on mental health. This study assessed the relationship between the challenges of remote work during the pandemic and mental health outcomes such as anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders. An online survey was conducted among South Korean adults, with data from 507 participants analyzed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Results indicated that participants in the ‘difficult’ remote work category experienced higher rates of anxiety (26.6%), sleep disorders (37.3%), and depressive symptoms (38.4%) compared to the ‘non-difficult’ category (14.1% anxiety, 24.8% sleep disorder, and 24.8% depressive symptoms), with all differences statistically significant (p ≤ 0.005). Logistic regression models adjusted for demographics and socio-economic factors revealed increased odds of mental health issues in the ‘difficult’ group (ORs ranging from 2.241 to 3.210). Sub-group analysis highlighted significant disparities, particularly among blue-collar workers and men. The findings underscore the need for organizational strategies to mitigate the mental health challenges of remote work. Interventions should include improving technological infrastructure, enhancing workspace ergonomics, and fostering robust communication channels to replace in-person interactions. Additionally, policies should address the differential impacts observed between genders and industries, tailoring support to diverse needs. On a personal level, promoting regular indoor exercise could help workers manage stress and enhance their well-being in remote work settings. This study calls for a comprehensive approach to managing the complex impacts of remote work on mental health. Key messages • This study calls for a comprehensive approach to managing the complex impacts of remote work on mental health. • The findings underscore the need for organizational strategies to mitigate the mental health challenges of remote work.

public, environmental & occupational health
Disparities in avoidable hospitalization by income in South Korea: data from the National Health Insurance cohort

Sung-Youn Chun,Woorim Kim,Eun-Cheol Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky198

2018-09-26

European Journal of Public Health

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Avoidable hospitalizations can act as an indicator for primary health care quality, in particular ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) as hospitalizations for these conditions are generally considered avoidable through successful management. This study aimed to examine whether differences exist between income levels in rates of avoidable hospitalization.METHODS: The South Korea National Health Insurance claims data from 2002 to 2013 were used. All hospitalizations were included and categorized into avoidable and non-avoidable cases. The independent variable was income level classified into quartiles and the dependent variable rates of avoidable hospitalization. Analysis was conducted using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) Poisson model. Subgroup analysis was performed based on chronic versus acute disease status and urban versus rural region.RESULTS: A total of 1 310 492 cases were included, in which the crude rate of avoidable hospitalizations was 1444.5 per 100 000 person years. Compared to the Q4 highest income group set as reference, the Q3 (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.09), Q2 (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.13-1.19) and Q1 (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.17-1.24) income groups showed higher rates of avoidable hospitalizations.CONCLUSION: Risks of avoidable hospitalizations for ACSCs was higher in lower than higher income groups, implying that socioeconomic status is related to disparities in avoidable hospitalizations. The findings suggest the importance of monitoring the vulnerable groups identified in managing avoidable hospitalizations.

public, environmental & occupational health
Regional disparities in health literacy for chronic diseases: focusing on healthcare resources and local extinction index

Seokmin Ji,Young Gyu Kwon,Hyunseo Lee,Chaehwan Shin,Minsung Sohn,Mankyu Choi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1423645

2024-09-12

Abstract:Objective: This study compared disparities between community health characteristics and health literacy levels for hypertension and diabetes by combining community-level characteristics, such as the local extinction index and healthcare resources, with individual-level characteristics based on the Andersen healthcare utilization model. Method: Data obtained from the 2017, 2019, and 2021 Community Health Surveys, Korean Statistical Information Service, and National Health Insurance Service were analyzed. The analyses included spatial analysis, propensity score matching, and cross-analysis. Results: Twenty-five extinction-risk regions (ERRs) were identified in 2017, 26 in 2019, and 29 in 2021, indicating a high risk of extinction and insufficient healthcare resources in non-metropolitan regions. Based on analyses of demographic changes and unmet medical needs at the individual level, we observed increased age and economic activity, decreased healthcare access, and lower education levels in ERRs compared to non-extinction-risk regions (NERRs). No significant differences were found between the regions regarding diagnosis or medication use concerning the health literacy gap for hypertension and diabetes. However, individuals in ERRs were significantly less likely than those in NERRs to be aware of such diseases or educated about their management. Discussion: Given that healthcare services in ERRs focus on chronic disease management rather than prevention, we propose two directions to reduce health disparities in ERRs. First, the government should encourage cooperation with private healthcare organizations to ensure the provision of health education programs in vulnerable areas. Second, improvements in awareness and education regarding chronic disease management can be achieved through digital healthcare and telemedicine. This study identifies regional disparities in chronic disease prevention and management, providing a basis for policies to ensure healthier communities with health equity.
Trajectory of medical expenditure and regional disparities in hypertensive patients in South Korea

Gi-Hyun Kim,Ji-Soo Song,Ji-Woong Nam,Woo-Ri Lee,Ki-Bong Yoo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1294045

IF: 5.2

2024-06-14

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:The aim of this study is to understand how different regions influence the management and financial burden of hypertension, and to identify regional disparities in hypertension management and medical expenditure. The study utilized data from the Korean Health Panel Survey conducted between 2014 and 2018, focusing on individuals with hypertension. Medical expenditures were classified into three trajectory groups: "Persistent Low," "Expenditure Increasing," and "Persistent High" over a five-year period using trajectory analysis. Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) analysis was then employed to identify the association between regions and medical expenditure trajectories. The results indicate that individuals residing in metropolitan cities (Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Gwangju, Daejeon, and Ulsan) and rural areas were more likely to belong to the "Expenditure Increasing" group compared to the "Persistent Low Expenditure" group (OR = 1.07; p < 0.001), as opposed to those in the capital city (Seoul) (OR = 1.07; p < 0.001). Additionally, residents of rural areas were more likely to be in the "High Expenditure" group compared to the "Persistent Low Expenditure" group than those residing in the capital city (OR = 1.05; p = 0.001). These findings suggest that individuals in rural areas may be receiving relatively inadequate management for hypertension, leading to higher medical expenditures compared to those in the capital region. These disparities signify health inequality and highlight the need for policy efforts to address regional imbalances in social structures and healthcare resource distribution to ensure equitable chronic disease management across different regions.

public, environmental & occupational health
Mainstreaming of Health Equity in Infectious Disease Control Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic Era

Hongjo Choi,Seong-Yi Kim,Jung-Woo Kim,Yukyung Park,Myoung-Hee Kim,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.593

2021-01-31

Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

Abstract:The Korean government's strategy to combat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has focused on non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as social distancing and wearing masks, along with testing, tracing, and treatment; overall, its performance has been relatively good compared to that of many other countries heavily affected by COVID-19. However, little attention has been paid to health equity in measures to control the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aimed to examine the unequal impacts of COVID-19 across socioeconomic groups and to suggest potential solutions to tackle these inequalities. The pathways linking social determinants and health could be entry points to tackle the unequal consequences of this public health emergency. It is crucial for infectious disease policy to consider social determinants of health including poor housing, precarious working conditions, disrupted healthcare services, and suspension of social services. Moreover, the high levels of uncertainty and complexity inherent in this public health emergency, as well as the health and socioeconomic inequalities caused by the pandemic, underscore the need for good governance other than top-down measures by the government. We emphasize that a people-centered perspective is a key approach during the pandemic era. Mutual trust between the state and civil society, strong accountability of the government, and civic participation are essential components of cooperative disaster governance.
Differential impacts of health systems and sociocultural environment on vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from four Asia-Pacific countries

Jakyung Lee,Susan Park,Soong-Nang Jang,Katherine Ann Reyes,Fernando Garcia Jr,Carmelita Canila,Joseph Oraño,Alfredo Jose Ballesteros,Tri Muhartini,Sandra Frans,Tiara Marthias,Likke Prawidya Putri,Yodi Mahendradhata,Chuan De Foo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18949-1

IF: 4.5

2024-06-05

BMC Public Health

Abstract:Background: This study aims to evaluate healthcare systems and pandemic responses in relation to marginalized and vulnerable groups, identify populations requiring urgent care, and assess the differential impacts on their health during the pandemic. Methods: Data were collected by the Asia-Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (APO)-National University of Singapore and APO-International Health Policy Program consortium members: Korea, Indonesia, Philippines, and Singapore. Data were collected through a combination of semi-structured interviews, policy document reviews, and analysis of secondary data. Results: Our findings reveal that the pandemic exacerbated existing health disparities, particularly affecting older adults, women, and children. Additionally, the study identified LGBTI individuals, healthcare workers, slum dwellers, and migrant workers as groups that faced particularly severe challenges during the pandemic. LGBTI individuals encountered heightened discrimination and limited access to health services tailored to their needs. Healthcare workers suffered from immense stress and risk due to prolonged exposure to the virus and critical working conditions. Slum dwellers struggled with healthcare access and social distancing due to high population density and inadequate sanitation. Migrant workers were particularly hard hit by high risks of virus transmission and stringent, often discriminatory, isolation measures that compounded their vulnerability. The study highlights the variation in the extent and nature of vulnerabilities, which were influenced by each country's specific social environment and healthcare infrastructure. It was observed that public health interventions often lacked the specificity required to effectively address the needs of all vulnerable groups, suggesting a gap in policy and implementation. Conclusions: The study underscores that vulnerabilities vary greatly depending on the social environment and context of each country, affecting the degree and types of vulnerable groups. It is critical that measures to ensure universal health coverage and equal accessibility to healthcare are specifically designed to address the needs of the most vulnerable. Despite commonalities among groups across different societies, these interventions must be adapted to reflect the unique characteristics of each group within their specific social contexts to effectively mitigate the impact of health disparities.
Comparative study of poverty dynamics and income structure: Pre and post COVID-19 impact on households with and without disabilities in South Korea

Su-Jung Nam,Hyesun Hwang,Yu Lim Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101580

IF: 4.615

2024-01-12

Disability and Health Journal

Abstract:Background The COVID-19 pandemic, as an external shock, has affected the health and economic well-being of individuals. Vulnerable populations with limited resources have also been affected, exacerbating societal inequalities throughout the pandemic. Objective This study examined poverty dynamics in South Korea before and after the COVID-19 outbreak, focusing on changes in the poverty status and income structure of the population with and without disabilities. Methods We conducted a multinomial logistic regression analysis using data from the 14th and 16th waves of the Korea Welfare Panel Study. Results The results show that the pandemic had a significant impact on income levels, particularly for individuals who experienced poverty, and notable differences were observed in income structures between groups with and without disabilities. While individuals without disabilities relied primarily on business income and regular as well as irregular income prior to experiencing poverty, those with disabilities experienced a decline in irregular and private transfer income. In addition, the poverty escape groups with and without disabilities showed increases in regular and irregular income. Conclusion The results of this study show how current population groups with and without disabilities have experienced changes in the poverty structure due to COVID-19. These results highlight the need for a comprehensive social protection system to address the external shocks faced by vulnerable populations.

public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,rehabilitation,health policy & services
Changes in depression trends during and after the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults in Korea

Kyu-Hyoung Jeong,Ju Hyun Ryu,Seoyoon Lee,Sunghee Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.90

2024-02-14

Global Mental Health

Abstract:This study aimed to complement the previous studies conducted within a short period of time by examining the long-term trends in depression levels of older adults through a longitudinal study that includes the period following the onset of COVID-19. For analysis, this study used the data from the 12th (2017) through 16th (2021) Korea Welfare Panel Study, and 2,716 data of older adults 65 years and older were included. Variables included gender, age, equalized annual income (USD $), education background, residential area, living alone and disability status. As a result, two types of changes in depression were identified: the 'rapidly rising' type and the 'steadily increasing'. We found that the lower the equalized annual income, women, the lower the education, living in urban and living alone showed a higher likelihood of belonging to the 'rapidly rising' type. The result suggests that those at risk of depression are at much higher risk during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. It is also necessary to provide timely and effective guidelines to prevent depression in older adults when implementing policies in response to an outbreak of infectious diseases, such as COVID-19.

psychiatry
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Medical Use of Elderly Patients with Hypertension: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea

Eunbyul Cho,Sujeong Han,Jae-Ryun Lee,Hyejin Lee,Bumjo Oh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.23.0129

Abstract:Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted healthcare services, including chronic disease management, for vulnerable groups, such as older individuals with hypertension. This study aimed to evaluate hypertension management in South Korea's elderly population during the pandemic using treatment consistency indices such as the continuity of care (COC), modified, modified continuity index (MMCI), and most frequent provider continuity (MFPC). Methods: This study used the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID-19-National Health Insurance Service cohort (K-COV-N cohort) from the National Health Insurance Service between 2017 and 2021. The research included a total of 4,097,299 hypertensive patients aged 65 years or older. We defined 2018 and 2019 as the baseline period before the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 and 2021 as the COVID-19 period and calculated the indices of medical continuity (number of visits, COC, MMCI, and MFPC) on a yearly basis. Results: The number of visits decreased during the COVID-19 period compared to the baseline period (59.64±52.75 vs. 50.49±50.33, P<0.001). However, COC, MMCI, and MFPC were not decreased in the baseline period compared to the COVID-19 period (0.71±0.21 vs. 0.71±0.22, P<0.001; 0.97±0.05 vs. 0.96±0.05, P<0.001; 0.8±0.17 vs. 0.8±0.17, P<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: COVID-19 had no significant impact on the continuity of care but affected the frequency of outpatient visits for older patients with hypertension. However, this study highlights the importance of addressing healthcare inequalities, especially in older patients with hypertension, during pandemics and advocates for policy changes to ensure continued care for vulnerable populations.

Deepening regional disparities in primary health care during COVID-19 in South Korea

Worsening of health disparities across COVID-19 pandemic stages in Korea

Regional inequalities in excess mortality and its community determinants during the early COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea

Interaction effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and regional deprivation on self-rated health: a cross-sectional study

Association between household income and mental health among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea: Insights from a community health survey

Regional Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Screening

Avoidance of Healthcare Utilization in South Korea during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

Challenges in Care for Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe Chronic Illnesses during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers Working around Acute Care Hospitals in South Korea

Socioeconomic Disparity and Risk of COVID-19 in South Korea: An NHIS-COVID-19 Database Cohort Study

Antenatal care inequalities in South Korea: An analysis of health insurance claims data (2013–2022) in a high‐resource, high‐use country

A nationwide survey on the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and respiratory disease in South Korea

Perceived social support and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationally-representative study

Rising Mental Health Issues from Remote Work Challenges in South Korea Amid COVID-19

Disparities in avoidable hospitalization by income in South Korea: data from the National Health Insurance cohort

Regional disparities in health literacy for chronic diseases: focusing on healthcare resources and local extinction index

Trajectory of medical expenditure and regional disparities in hypertensive patients in South Korea

Mainstreaming of Health Equity in Infectious Disease Control Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic Era

Differential impacts of health systems and sociocultural environment on vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from four Asia-Pacific countries

Comparative study of poverty dynamics and income structure: Pre and post COVID-19 impact on households with and without disabilities in South Korea

Changes in depression trends during and after the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults in Korea

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Medical Use of Elderly Patients with Hypertension: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea