Valorisation of Forest and Agriculture Residual Biomass—The Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Analyse Composting, Mulching, and Energetic Valorisation Strategies

Isabel Brás,Elisabete Silva,Roberta Raimondo,Rafaella Saetta,Vincenzo Mignano,Massimiliano Fabbricino,José Ferreira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020630

IF: 3.9

2024-01-12

Sustainability

Abstract:The treatment of agricultural and forest residues (AFRs) has become an important issue nowadays, both to avoid improper management and for their enhancement. In the study area of Viseu (Portugal), the AFRs are taken to a Residual Biomass Collection Centre. These are valorised in a Biomass Power Plant to produce electricity. Two further processes could be implemented to valorise this biomass: mulching and composting. This study aims to understand the best strategy to enhance this type of biomass residual considering their environmental performance. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was applied considering a cradle-to-grave approach. Different processes of all the technologies were analysed, and the data collected enabled a comparison of 11 environmental impact categories. The results show that composting is the best alternative, except for global warming and ozone layer depletion, and energy valorisation has the greatest impact on five of the considered categories. In the three processes, impacts are mainly associated with the production and shredding phases of the residual biomass, rather than the transportation stages, due to the short distances covered. In all cases, the value of the final product generates market consequences in terms of electricity and fertiliser production. In line with the aim of the study, its outcomes may provide scientific support to local decision makers in defining best practices in the management of the AFRs.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to analyze different treatment strategies for agricultural and forest residues (AFRs) through the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method to determine the optimal environmental benefit plan. Specifically, the study compared the environmental impacts of three technologies - composting, mulching and energy conversion - when dealing with these residues. The purpose of the study is to provide a scientific basis to help local decision - makers formulate the best agricultural and forest residue management practices, thereby reducing the risk of rural fires and at the same time increasing the value of these residues.

The research is set in the city of Viseu in Portugal. The current practice in this area is to collect agricultural and forest residues in Biomass Residue Collection Centers (RBCC) and then transport them to biomass power plants for energy conversion. However, in addition to energy conversion, there are two other possible treatment methods: mulching and composting. These two methods can directly apply organic materials to the soil to increase the soil's biochemical nutrients and improve its physical and chemical properties. In addition, these biological resources can also be used locally, thereby reducing the economic and environmental costs associated with transportation.

The study adopted the LCA method, considering the entire "cradle - to - grave" process, and analyzed the impacts of different technologies on 11 environmental impact categories. The results show that composting is the optimal choice, but it performs poorly in terms of global warming and ozone layer depletion; energy conversion has the greatest impact in five of the considered categories. The study also pointed out that regardless of which treatment method is adopted, the main environmental impacts are concentrated in the production and crushing stages of the residues, not in the transportation stage, because the transportation distance is short. The value of the final product will also have an impact on the market, such as the production of electricity and fertilizers.

In conclusion, this study aims to evaluate the environmental performance of different treatment strategies through scientific methods and provide guidance for local agricultural and forest residue management.