Abstract:While it is well noted the importance of pursuing inclusive finance to accelerate economic growth and financial sustainability, few actionable insights have been developed toward how financial institutions can balance the potential socioeconomic trade-off between equality and profitability. The challenges are largely three-folds: (1) lack of sufficient information (collateral); (2) lack of understanding of the impact of information on financial equality beyond economic profitability; and (3) lack of real-world causal evaluations under a (large) alternative set of counterfactual policies. Enlightened by the emerging sources of digitized user-behavior data (a.k.a. “alternative data”) enabled by the high penetration of mobile devices and internet access, we study how alternative data from smartphones and social media can help mitigate the potential financial inequality while preserving business profitability in the context of financial credit risk assessment. For evaluation, we partnered with a leading microloan platform and designed a “meta” field experiment that allowed us to recover and compare the “what-if” scenarios in the real world under an exhaustive set of counterfactual policies. Interestingly, we find that compared to using online social media information, profiling user financial risk using smartphone activities is 1.3 times more effective in improving financial inclusion (an increase of 23.05% vs. 18.11%), and likewise 1.3 times more effective in improving business profitability (an increase of 42% vs. 33%). Surprisingly, using consumers’ online shopping activities for credit risk profiling can hurt financial inclusion. Furthermore, we investigate the potential underlying mechanism for improved financial inclusion. Our findings suggest that alternative data, especially users’ smartphone activities, not only demonstrate higher ubiquity but also appear more orthogonal to conventional sensitive demographic attributes. This, in turn, can help better mitigate the statistical bias driven by unobserved factors or under-representative training samples during machine-based risk assessment processes.

The risk screening effect of digital insurance distribution

Digitalisation and cream skimming adverse selection in the property-casualty insurance industry: evidence from China

It’s all about speed and costs: The impact of digital technology on the insurance market structure

Digital financial inclusion development, investment diversification, and household extreme portfolio risk

Mitigating Transaction Risk for Cross-Border E-Commerce Firms: A Multiagent-Based Simulation Study

The impact of digital finance on household insurance purchases: evidence from micro data in China

The Impact of Digitalization on the Insurance Value Chain and the Insurability of Risks

Digitalization as a double-edged sword: A deep learning analysis of risk management in Chinese banks

Digital Finance and Commercial Banks' Risk

The impact of digital finance on household participation in risky financial markets: Evidence-based study from China

Digital Financial Inclusion and Household Risk Sharing: Evidence from China's Digital Finance Revolution

Consumer perceptions of risk and uncertainty and the implications for behaviour towards innovative retail services: The case of Internet Banking

Digital Transformation and Risk Differentiation in the Banking Industry: Evidence from Chinese Commercial Banks

Profit vs. Equality? The Case of Financial Risk Assessment and A New Perspective of Alternative Data

Impact of Digital Finance on Credit Structure and Risk-Taking in Commercial Banks: An Empirical Analysis

The Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers' Cross-Platform Buying Behavior

The Impact of Digital Finance on Commercial Banks Risk-taking: Empirical Analysis Based on 176 Chinese Commercial Banks

Multidimensional Private Information, Market Structure and Insurance Markets

Big data, risk classification, and privacy in insurance markets

Digitalization and firms' systematic risk in China

How digital transformation affects bank risk: Evidence from listed Chinese banks