Abstract:Vibrotactile stimuli can be effective as warning signals, but their effectiveness as directional take-over requests in automated driving is yet unknown. This study aimed to investigate the correct response rate, reaction times, and eye and head orientation for static versus dynamic directional take-over requests presented via vibrating motors in the driver seat. In a driving simulator, eighteen participants performed three sessions: 1) a session involving no driving (Baseline), 2) driving a highly automated car without additional task (HAD), and 3) driving a highly automated car while performing a mentally demanding task (N-Back). Per session, participants received four directional static (in the left or right part of the seat) and four dynamic (moving from one side towards the opposite left or right of the seat) take-over requests via two 6×4 motor matrices embedded in the seat back and bottom. In the Baseline condition, participants reported whether the cue was left or right, and in the HAD and N-Back conditions participants had to change lanes to the left or to the right according to the directional cue. The correct response rate was operationalized as the accuracy of the self-reported direction (Baseline session) and the accuracy of the lane change direction (HAD & N-Back sessions). The results showed that the correct response rate ranged between 94% for static patterns in the Baseline session and 74% for dynamic patterns in the N-Back session, although these effects were not statistically significant. Steering wheel touch and steering input reaction times were approximately 200ms faster for static patterns than for dynamic ones. Eye tracking results revealed a correspondence between head/eye-gaze direction and lane change direction, and showed that head and eye-gaze movements where initiated faster for static vibrations than for dynamic ones. In conclusion, vibrotactile stimuli presented via the driver seat are effective as warnings, but their effectiveness as directional take-over requests may be limited. The present study may encourage further investigation into how to get drivers safely back into the loop.

Do users desire gestures for in-vehicle interaction? Towards the subjective assessment of gestures in a high-fidelity driving simulator

Evaluation of Gesture-Based In-Vehicle Interaction: User Experience and the Potential to Reduce Driver Distraction

Mid-air gestures for in-vehicle media player: elicitation, segmentation, recognition, and eye-tracking testing

The intuitive grasp interface: design and evaluation of micro-gestures on the steering wheel for driving scenario

Testing the Cognitive Load of Gesture Interaction on Drivers When Performing Tertiary Tasks

Multitasking While Driving: How Drivers Self-Regulate Their Interaction with In-Vehicle Touchscreens in Automated Driving

A Human Factors Evaluation of the Spatial Gesture Interface for In-Vehicle Information Systems.

Using Glance Behaviour to Inform the Design of Adaptive HMI for Partially Automated Vehicles

In-Vehicle Human Machine Interface: Investigating the Effects of Tactile Displays on Information Presentation in Automated Vehicles

The Effects of a Predictive HMI and Different Transition Frequencies on Acceptance, Workload, Usability, and Gaze Behavior during Urban Automated Driving

Designing Gaze-Based Interactions for Teleoperation: Eye Stick and Eye Click

How Do Drivers Self-Regulate their Secondary Task Engagements? The Effect of Driving Automation on Touchscreen Interactions and Glance Behavior

The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.

Assessing Augmented Reality Selection Techniques for Passengers in Moving Vehicles: A Real-World User Study

Evaluation of Three In-Vehicle Interactions from Drivers' Driving Performance and Eye Movement Behavior.

"It Must Be Gesturing Towards Me": Gesture-Based Interaction between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians

A Wearable Virtual Touch System for Cars

On the forces of driver distraction: Explainable predictions for the visual demand of in-vehicle touchscreen interactions

Communication Between Automated Vehicles and Drivers in Manual Driving Vehicles: Using a Mechanical Arm to Produce Gestures.

Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat

Evaluation of Multimodal External Human–Machine Interface for Driverless Vehicles in Virtual Reality