Phase 1 randomized trial of inpatient high-intensity interval training after major surgery

Shambavi J. Rao,Ian Solsky,Antonius Gunawan,Perry Shen,Edward Levine,Clancy J. Clark
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.020
2024-01-01
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND High-intensity interval training (HIT) can provide physiologic benefits and may improve postoperative recovery but has not been evaluated in inpatients. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of HIT after major surgery. METHODS We performed a phase I randomized study comparing HIT to low-intensity continuous ambulation (40 meters) during the initial inpatient stay after major surgery at a large academic center. Clinicopathologic and pre- and post-exercise physiologic data were captured. Perceived exertion was measured throughout the intervention. RESULTS Twenty-two subjects were enrolled and randomized with 90% (20 subject, 10 per arm) completing all aspects of the study. One patient declined participation in the exercise intervention. The HIT and continuous ambulation groups were relatively similar in terms of median age (65.5 vs 63.5), female gender (20% vs. 40%), white race (90% vs 90%), having a cancer diagnosis (100% vs 80%), undergoing GI surgery (60% vs 80%), median Karnofsky score (60 vs. 60), and ability to independently ambulate preoperatively (100% vs. 90%). All subjects completed the exercise without protocol deviation, cohort crossover, or safety events. Compared to the continuous ambulation group, the HIT group had higher end median perceived exertion: 5.0 (IQR 5.5) vs 3.0 (IQR 1.8); shorter overall time to complete assigned exercise: 56.6sec vs 91.8sec; and a trend towards higher median gait-speed over 40 meters: 0.71m/s vs 0.44m/s, p=0.126. CONCLUSION HIT in the hospitalized postoperative patient is safe and may be implemented to help promote positive physiologic outcomes and recovery.
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?