Subsequent strategies and underlying mechanism of acquired resistance to PD-1 axis inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Huilan Wang,Xinyu Cheng,Fan Yang,Lu Chen,Anmei Zhang,Liangzhi Zhong,Haixia Long,Bo Zhu,Zhongyu Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000003015
IF: 6.133
2024-04-07
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:To the Editor : With the widespread application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical practice, acquired resistance (AR) to programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develops and limits the durability of immunotherapy. AR is a clinical condition in which a patient initially responds to ICIs but relapses and progresses after a period of time. The rates of AR have not been routinely reported in lung cancer but typically range from 12.9% to 64%. [ 1 ] However, studies on subsequent management strategies and the mechanism of AR to PD-1/PD-L1 axis inhibitors in lung cancer are limited. The main exploratory strategies are immunotherapy rechallenge and the combination of ICIs with other therapies, including local therapy, chemotherapy, antiangiogenetic treatment, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors. [ 2 ] The purpose of this study was to characterize the clinical patterns of AR and compare different subsequent therapies and outcomes in NSCLC patients after AR to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Moreover, we explored the underlying mechanism of AR by analyzing the alterations in next-generation sequencing (NGS) data before and after AR.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?