Comparative analysis of residential building decarbonization policies in major economies: insights from the EU, China, and India

Chun Xia-Bauer,Sriraj Gokarakonda,Siyue Guo,Faidra Filippidou,Stefan Thomas,Jyoti R. Maheshwari,Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-024-10225-w
IF: 3.1339
2024-05-08
Energy Efficiency
Abstract:The global building sector, responsible for over 30% of CO 2 emissions, necessitates urgent decarbonization efforts. This paper examines residential building decarbonization policies in three major economies—the European Union (EU), China, and India. It provides an overview of diverse policies through policy landscape analysis and delves into the design specifics with a detailed policy intensity analysis of building energy codes, information disclosure, and financial incentives in each region. Our findings reveal a diverse mix of policies targeting residential building decarbonization in all three regions. While the EU and China have long-established diverse policy instruments, India's building energy efficiency policies are relatively recent and limited. Detailed analyses of building energy codes, information disclosure, and financial incentives expose variations in ambition, scope, and implementation, even with shared policy instruments. Significant advancements in building energy codes, particularly in stringency and compliance checks, are evident in the EU and China. Conversely, India faces a notable obstacle with limited adoption of residential building energy codes, impacting its journey towards net-zero. The EU leads in building energy labelling policies, while China and India encounter various challenges hindering widespread implementation. Financial incentives across the three regions predominantly take the form of subsidies, potentially straining public budgets. The study concludes with reflections on the pressing need for future research extending beyond the operational phase of buildings.
energy & fuels,green & sustainable science & technology,environmental studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Address This paper aims to explore and compare the similarities and differences in residential building decarbonization policies among three major economies: the European Union (EU), China, and India. It also highlights the shortcomings of these policies. Specifically, the paper conducts an in-depth study of building energy efficiency regulations, information disclosure, and financial incentives in these three regions through policy landscape analysis and detailed policy intensity analysis. ### Summary of Main Content - **Current State of the Global Building Sector**: The building sector accounts for 34% of global energy demand and 37% of energy-related CO2 emissions. Despite progress over the past 20 years, the building sector is not yet on track to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. - **Importance of Residential Buildings**: Residential buildings have higher per capita CO2 emissions globally compared to commercial buildings, especially in the three studied regions. - **Situation in the EU**: The residential sector accounted for 27% of total final energy consumption in 2021, with space heating making up 64.4% of final energy consumption. The EU aims to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030. - **Situation in China**: China has a large stock of residential buildings, expected to grow by about 40% by 2060. Energy consumption in Chinese residential buildings mainly comes from space heating and air conditioning. China's policy targets peak CO2 emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060. - **Situation in India**: India's residential building stock is expected to increase from less than 2 billion square meters to over 5 billion square meters. Residential buildings in India account for about 25-27% of final energy consumption and contribute approximately 5-7% of energy-related emissions. India aims to achieve net-zero emissions by 2070. - **Policy Comparison Analysis**: - EU: Due to the large existing building stock, deep energy retrofitting is the main strategy. Additionally, the electrification of heating is an important aspect. - China: New buildings should strive to meet near-zero or zero energy standards, while existing buildings require large-scale energy retrofitting. - India: Enhancing the energy efficiency of new buildings to achieve passive cooling and promoting efficient air conditioning equipment are key strategies. - **Policy Tool Analysis**: The paper provides a detailed analysis of the design characteristics of policy tools such as building energy efficiency regulations, information disclosure mechanisms, and financial incentives, and points out the differences in the implementation of these policies. In summary, this paper systematically analyzes the residential building decarbonization policies of these three major economies, revealing policy differences between different countries and regions, and provides valuable insights for global policymakers.