Theoretical Mechanistic Studies of Rh‐Catalyzed C(sp 3 )—H Amination: A Comparison with Co Analogue and Metal Effects
Yang Yu,Gen Luo,Jimin Yang,Yi Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.202000153
IF: 5.56
2020-09-07
Chinese Journal of Chemistry
Abstract:<p>The mechanism of Rh‐catalyzed C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H amination has been computationally investigated. The reaction mechanism mainly involves sequential C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H activation, decarboxylation, nitrene migration insertion, and protonation steps. Competitive concerted metalation deprotonation (CMD) and external base assisted deprotonation (EBAD) pathways are found for the involved C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H activation in both Rh and Co analogous systems. This is different from the previously reported C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–H activation, where the CMD is dominant. The key mechanistic difference between the two systems is found to be in the C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H activation step. In comparison with Rh species, the lower activity of Co complex toward the C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H activation could be ascribed to smaller atomic size of Co and thus larger steric repulsion between ancillary ligand and substrate along with the CMD pathway. In view of the EBAD pathway, however, the lower activity of Co species could be imputed to the triplet nature of Co center, which is against the electron transfer from the electron‐rich carbon atom of the deprotonating C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H bond to the Co center. As to the subsequent decarboxylation and nitrene insertion steps, compared with the Co system, the relatively lower reactivity of Rh species is partially due to the stronger Rh–N bond, and the higher π(Rh–N) and π*(Rh–N) orbital energies of the corresponding transition state structure.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
chemistry, multidisciplinary