Abstract:Revision rhinoplasty represents the amalgamation of years of knowledge, judgment, technique, communication, self-critique, and patient selection. The surgeon's ego, economics, or personality should not persuade or dissuade him or her from undertaking revision rhinoplasty. This decision should be made after critical evaluation of his/her skills at technical execution, and communicating with the patient, as well as the patient's perception and expectations. If any concern exists, delay. Re-evaluation and referral become prudent. These patients may already be angry. They are obviously dissatisfied with their results and have frequently had attempts at revision by the previous surgeon. All these factors complicate the psychological aspects of an already difficult task. One other realization is the fact that this now becomes your result if it is the revision of a colleague's surgery. When comfortable with all of these factors, revision rhinoplasty can then be undertaken. The need for revision may be subtle or grotesque and can result from a multitude of factors: unrecognized deformities at the primary surgery; misunderstood consequences of technique; poor technique; unfavorable healing; postsurgical injury; the inevitable need for revision surgery in a difficult nose; and poor aesthetic judgment. Revision of one's own results is emotionally more difficult, but functionally and technically easier. A complete understanding of the primary surgery, access to the initial photographs, and a rapport with a patient who is willing to return are all helpful in achieving a satisfactory result. In approaching the correction of postoperative deformities, it is important to have an understanding of the anatomic abnormality as well as the aesthetic deformity. Recognizing the anatomic cause of the postsurgical deformity is more relevant to their avoidance and to the maturation of the surgeon than to their correction and the desired aesthetic result except when functional abnormalities exist and need correction. Ultimately it is the deformity that needs to be corrected, and this may or may not require the restoration of anatomic normalcy.

Revision Nasal Reconstruction After Previous Forehead Flap

Forehead Flap for Simultaneous Reconstruction after Head and Neck Malignant Tumor Resection.

Complex Nasal Reconstruction: A Methodical Approach to the Three-Stage Paramedian Forehead Flap

Nasal reconstruction: experience using tissue expansion and forehead flap

Paramedian Forehead Flap Reconstruction for Nasal Defects

Full Thickness Nasal Reconstruction With Paired Pericranial and Paramedian Forehead Flaps

The Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: From Antiquity to Present

Choice of Single-Staged Reconstruction of Nasal Defect

A Lifeboat for Failed Nasal Reconstructions: The Supraclavicular-Submental Sandwich Flap

Three-stage folded forehead flap for nasal reconstruction: Objective and subjective measurements of aesthetic and functional outcomes

Designing a Nasal Lining-Framework Complex for Reconstructing Total Nasal Defects

Outcomes of Two-Stage Interpolated Flaps Versus Single-Stage Techniques for Reconstruction of Intermediate Nasal Defects

Nasal Lining Reconstruction with Loco-regional Flaps

A Comprehensive Review of Bilobed Flaps in Nasal Reconstruction: Technique, Outcomes, and Considerations

Management of Frontal Bone Exposure Following Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction

Transposition Island Pedicle Flap to Repair the Nasal Ala

Use of Banked Fibula for Improved Nasal Reconstruction Following Free Fibula Midface Reconstruction

Repair of Asian Nasal Subunit Defects Using Nasolabial Perforator Flaps: A Retrospective Study.

Revision rhinoplasty for monographs in facial plastic surgery contemporary rhinoplasty

Reconstruction of 2 Independent Facial Defects Using A Single Paramedian Forehead Flap