Ranking Alpha Lipoic Acid and Gamma Linolenic Acid in terms of Efficacy and Safety in the management of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta- Analysis

Mario B. Prado,Karen Joy B. Adiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.01.007
IF: 2.774
2024-01-30
Canadian Journal of Diabetes
Abstract:Background Current medications for diabetic neuropathy (DN) recommended by ADA and AAN don't address the pathologic process of denervation among DN patients, hence ancillary treatments such as reactive oxygen scavengers (ROS) may be needed. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the available evidence about the efficacy and safety of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) and gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) in the management of DN. Methods Using the search terms [(alpha lipoic acid or ALA or thioctic acid or thioctacid) or (gamma linolenic acid or GLA)] AND [(Diabetes or Diabetes Mellitus) AND (polyneuropathy or neuropathy or sensorimotor polyneuropathy or radiculopathy)], 11 studies were included in this review and combined meta-analysis. Results Eight of the 11 papers (73%) reported significant benefit of ALA against placebo. In meta-analysis, the Total Symptom Score (TSS) of ALA600 was 1.05 points lower (SMD: -1.05, CI:-2.07 to -0.04, p=0.04, I2=98.18%) compared to control at the end of the study. In network meta-analysis, ALA600 (SMD: -1.68, CI:-2.8 to -0.6) and GLA (SMD: -2.39, CI:-4.3 to -0.5) had significantly lower TSS compared to placebo. Moreover, GLA had the highest probability to be the best (52.7%) in improving DN symptoms. In all studies, most adverse events include GI disturbances. In terms of tolerability, no differences were detected between ALA and control groups. Conclusion ALA and GLA appear to be safe and efficacious biofactors to improve DN symptoms.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?