Abstract:We present the parallel particle-in-cell (PIC) code Apar-T and, more importantly, address the fundamental question of the relations between the PIC model, the Vlasov-Maxwell theory, and real plasmas. First, we present four validation tests: spectra from simulations of thermal plasmas, linear growth rates of the relativistic tearing instability and of the filamentation instability, and nonlinear filamentation merging phase. For the filamentation instability we show that the effective growth rates measured on the total energy can differ by more than 50% from the linear cold predictions and from the fastest modes of the simulation. We link these discrepancies to the superparticle number per cell and to the level of field fluctuations. Second, we detail a new method for initial loading of Maxwell-Jüttner particle distributions with relativistic bulk velocity and relativistic temperature, and explain why the traditional method with individual particle boosting fails. The formulation of the relativistic Harris equilibrium is generalized to arbitrary temperature and mass ratios. Both are required for the tearing instability setup. Third, we turn to the key point of this paper and scrutinize the question of what description of (weakly coupled) physical plasmas is obtained by PIC models. These models rely on two building blocks: coarse-graining, i.e., grouping of the order of p ~ 1010 real particles into a single computer superparticle, and field storage on a grid with its subsequent finite superparticle size. We introduce the notion of coarse-graining dependent quantities, i.e., quantities depending on p. They derive from the PIC plasma parameter ΛPIC, which we show to behave as ΛPIC ∝ 1/p. We explore two important implications. One is that PIC collision- and fluctuation-induced thermalization times are expected to scale with the number of superparticles per grid cell, and thus to be a factor p ~ 1010 smaller than in real plasmas, a fact that we confirm with simulations. The other is that the level of electric field fluctuations scales as 1/ΛPIC ∝ p. We provide a corresponding exact expression, taking into account the finite superparticle size. We confirm both expectations with simulations. Fourth, we compare the Vlasov-Maxwell theory, often used for code benchmarking, to the PIC model. The former describes a phase-space fluid with Λ = + ∞ and no correlations, while the PIC plasma features a small Λ and a high level of correlations when compared to a real plasma. These differences have to be kept in mind when interpreting and validating PIC results against the Vlasov-Maxwell theory and when modeling real physical plasmas.

Explicit energy-conserving modification of relativistic PIC method

Explicit energy-conserving modification of relativistic PIC method

High-order Implicit Particle-in-cell Method for Plasma Simulations at Solid Densities.

Relativistic reference frame PIC simulations for electron beam dynamics with meter-scale propagation inside plasma and under external fields

Pseudospectral particle-in-cell formulation with arbitrary charge and current-density time dependencies for the modeling of relativistic plasmas

QuickPIC: a highly efficient fully parallelized PIC code for plasma-based acceleration

RelSIM: A Relativistic Semi-implicit Method for Particle-in-Cell Simulations

Explicit Structure-Preserving Geometric Particle-in-Cell Algorithm in Curvilinear Orthogonal Coordinate Systems and Its Applications to Whole-Device 6D Kinetic Simulations of Tokamak Physics

Direct Implicit and Explicit Energy-Conserving Particle-in-Cell Methods for Modeling of Capacitively-Coupled Plasma Devices

Geometric Particle-In-Cell discretizations of a plasma hybrid model with kinetic ions and mass-less fluid electrons

A quasi-static particle-in-cell algorithm based on an azimuthal Fourier decomposition for highly efficient simulations of plasma-based acceleration: QPAD

Apar-T: code, validation, and physical interpretation of particle-in-cell results

Coupling multi-fluid dynamics equipped with Landau closures to the particle-in-cell method

Advances in the Implementation of the Exactly Energy Conserving Semi-Implicit (ECsim) Particle in Cell Method

Recent development of fully kinetic particle-in-cell method and its application to fusion plasma instability study

An implicit, conservative electrostatic particle-in-cell algorithm for paraxial magnetic nozzles

An explicit, energy-conserving particle-in-cell scheme

Controlling the Numerical Cerenkov Instability in PIC simulations using a customized finite difference Maxwell solver and a local FFT based current correction

Energy conserving particle-in-cell methods for relativistic Vlasov--Maxwell equations of laser-plasma interaction

Latest progress on the reduced-order particle-in-cell scheme: II. Quasi-3D implementation and verification