Comparison of the Limit of Detection of Paracetamol, Propyphenazone, and Caffeine Analyzed Using Thin-Layer Chromatography and High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography

Katarzyna Bober-Majnusz,Alina Pyka-Pająk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12061153
IF: 3.5
2024-06-04
Processes
Abstract:TLC (thin-layer chromatography) and HPTLC (high-performance thin-layer chromatography) in normal (NP) and reversed (RP) phase systems were combined with densitometry to analyze caffeine, propyphenazone, and paracetamol. This work aims to check whether comparable limit of detection (LOD) values can be obtained on TLC and HPTLC plates. Analyses were performed on five (NP) or four (RP) different stationary phases (chromatographic plates), testing, in both cases, three mobile phases. It is shown that by using both TLC and HPTLC plates, it is possible to develop chromatographic conditions that enable the detection of compounds analyzed in amounts ranging from a dozen to several dozen μg/spot. In the RP system, lower LOD values for all tested compounds were obtained using TLC than HPTLC. However, performing analyses in the NP, similar (of the same order) LOD values were obtained for caffeine, propyphenazone, and paracetamol when using both TLC and HPTLC plates. For example, during the NP-HPTLC analysis using silica gel 60F254 plates (#1.05548) and mobile phase B (n-hexane—acetone—ammonia, 25:25:0.5, v/v/v), LOD values for caffeine, propyphenazone, and paracetamol were 0.010, 0.046, and 0.030 μg/spot, respectively. During NP-TLC analysis using silica gel 60F254 (#1.05554 plates) and the mobile phase C (chloroform—toluene—ethyl acetate—methanol—80% acetic acid, 18:18:7.5:6:0.3, v/v), the values of LOD were 0.054, 0.029, and 0.016 μg/spot, respectively. During RP-TLC analysis using TLC RP-18F254 plates (#1.05559) and mobile phase F (methanol-water, 40:10, v/v), the LOD values were 0.019, 0.024, and 0.053 μg/spot, respectively. Therefore, for economical reasons, TLC plates should be recommended for analyses of caffeine, propyphenazone, and paracetamol, which are several times cheaper than HPTLC plates.
engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: when analyzing paracetamol, propyphenazone and caffeine using thin - layer chromatography (TLC) and high - performance thin - layer chromatography (HPTLC), whether the limit of detection (LOD) values can reach a similar level. Specifically, the study aims to verify whether TLC technology can obtain LOD values comparable to or lower than those of HPTLC technology under different conditions. ### Research Background - **Limit of Detection (LOD)**: The limit of detection refers to the lowest amount or concentration at which a component can be reliably detected. - **TLC vs. HPTLC**: TLC is a relatively simple and low - cost chromatographic method, while HPTLC has higher sensitivity and resolution and can theoretically provide lower LOD values. - **Drug Analysis**: Paracetamol, propyphenazone and caffeine are common drug components and need to be subject to quality control and production process monitoring. ### Research Objectives - **Compare LOD Values**: Compare the LOD values of TLC and HPTLC by using different stationary phases and mobile phases in normal - phase (NP) and reversed - phase (RP) systems. - **Economic Considerations**: Evaluate whether TLC can be a more economical option while ensuring detection sensitivity. ### Experimental Methods - **Compounds and Solutions**: Three pharmacologically active compounds were studied: caffeine, propyphenazone and paracetamol. Standard solutions of different concentrations were prepared. - **Chromatographic Conditions**: Multiple TLC and HPTLC stationary phases were used, as well as different mobile phase combinations. - **Quantitative Analysis**: Densitometry was used for quantitative analysis, and the maximum absorption wavelength (λmax) was determined by spectrodensitometry. - **LOD Calculation**: According to the calibration curve data, the LOD was calculated using the following formula: \[ \text{LOD} = 3.3\times\frac{\sigma}{S} \] where: - \(\sigma\): standard deviation - \(S\): standard deviation of the intercept (\(s_a\)) or residual standard deviation (\(s_{xy}\)) ### Results and Discussion - **LOD Value Comparison**: The results show that in the reversed - phase system (RP), the LOD values of TLC are usually lower than those of HPTLC. In the normal - phase system (NP), the LOD values of TLC and HPTLC are similar. - **Economy**: Since the price of TLC plates is much lower than that of HPTLC plates, from an economic point of view, it is recommended to use TLC plates for the analysis of these compounds. - **Cluster Analysis**: Through cluster analysis of LOD values, it was found that the LOD values under certain specific chromatographic conditions are similar, which helps to optimize experimental conditions. ### Conclusion This study proves that under certain conditions, TLC can provide LOD values comparable to or even lower than those of HPTLC, and at the same time has significant economic advantages. Therefore, for the analysis of paracetamol, propyphenazone and caffeine, the use of TLC plates is recommended.