Respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer in community-based studies: impact of job-exposure matrix specifications on exposure-response relationships
Johan Ohlander,Hans Kromhout,Roel Vermeulen,Lützen Portengen,Benjamin Kendzia,Barbara Savary,Domenico Cavallo,Andrea Cattaneo,Enrica Migliori,Lorenzo Richiardi,Nils Plato,Heinz-Erich Wichmann,Stefan Karrasch,Dario Consonni,Maria Teresa Landi,Neil E Caporaso,Jack Siemiatycki,Per Gustavsson,Karl-Heinz Jöckel,Wolfgang Ahrens,Hermann Pohlabeln,Guillermo Fernández-Tardón,David Zaridze,Jolanta Lissowska Jolanta Lissowska,Beata Swiatkowska Beata Swiatkowska,John K Field John K Field,John R McLaughlin,Paul A Demers,Tamas Pandics,Francesco Forastiere,Eleonora Fabianova,Miriam Schejbalova,Lenka Foretova,Vladimir Janout,Dana Mates,Christine Barul,Thomas Brüning,Thomas Behrens,Kurt Straif,Joachim Schüz,Ann Olsson,Susan Peters
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4140
2024-04-01
Abstract:Objectives: The quantitative job-exposure matrix SYN-JEM consists of various dimensions: job-specific estimates, region-specific estimates, and prior expert ratings of jobs by the semi-quantitative DOM-JEM. We analyzed the effect of different JEM dimensions on the exposure-response relationships between occupational silica exposure and lung cancer risk to investigate how these variations influence estimates of exposure by a quantitative JEM and associated health endpoints. Methods: Using SYN-JEM, and alternative SYN-JEM specifications with varying dimensions included, cumulative silica exposure estimates were assigned to 16 901 lung cancer cases and 20 965 controls pooled from 14 international community-based case-control studies. Exposure-response relationships based on SYN-JEM and alternative SYN-JEM specifications were analyzed using regression analyses (by quartiles and log-transformed continuous silica exposure) and generalized additive models (GAM), adjusted for age, sex, study, cigarette pack-years, time since quitting smoking, and ever employment in occupations with established lung cancer risk. Results: SYN-JEM and alternative specifications generated overall elevated and similar lung cancer odds ratios ranging from 1.13 (1st quartile) to 1.50 (4th quartile). In the categorical and log-linear analyses SYN-JEM with all dimensions included yielded the best model fit, and exclusion of job-specific estimates from SYN-JEM yielded the poorest model fit. Additionally, GAM showed the poorest model fit when excluding job-specific estimates. Conclusion: The established exposure-response relationship between occupational silica exposure and lung cancer was marginally influenced by varying the dimensions of SYN-JEM. Optimized modelling of exposure-response relationships will be obtained when incorporating all relevant dimensions, namely prior rating, job, time, and region. Quantitative job-specific estimates appeared to be the most prominent dimension for this general population JEM.