Development and Validation of Short Forms of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (F-PCS-5) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (F-TSK-6) in Musculoskeletal Chronic Pain Patients
Joane Le Carré,François Luthi,Cyrille Burrus,Michel Konzelmann,Philippe Vuistiner,Bertrand Léger,Charles Benaïm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S379337
IF: 2.8319
2023-01-20
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Joane Le Carré, 1, 2 François Luthi, 2– 4 Cyrille Burrus, 2, 3 Michel Konzelmann, 2, 5 Philippe Vuistiner, 1, 2 Bertrand Léger, 1, 2 Charles Benaïm 1, 4 1 Department of Medical Research, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland; 2 Institute for Research in Rehabilitation, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland; 3 Department of Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland; 4 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; 5 Assessment and Consultation Department, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland Correspondence: Joane Le Carré, Ave Grand-Champsec 90, Sion, 1950, Switzerland, Tel +41 27 603 20 73, Email Purpose: Chronic pain is a complex phenomenon. Understanding its multiple dimensions requires the use of a combination of several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, completing multiple PROMs is time-consuming and can be a burden for patients. The objective of our study was to simultaneously reduce the French versions of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) questionnaires to enable their use in an ambulatory and clinical settings. Patients and Methods: We conducted a clinical study between May 2014 and August 2020 in our rehabilitation center. 1428 chronic musculoskeletal pain patients (CMSP) were included. The originality of our approach is that the reduction method included qualitative as well as quantitative analyses. The study was divided into two parts: 1) reduction of the questionnaires (n=1363) based on internal consistency (item-to-total correlation), principal component analysis (item loadings), Rasch analysis (infit/outfit), floor and ceiling effect (quantitative analyses) and expert judgment of items (qualitative analysis), and 2) validation of the reduced questionnaires (n=65), including test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), homogeneity (Cronbach α), criterion validity (Pearson correlation [r] with the long-version score), determination of the pathological cutoff and Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). The two full-length questionnaires include 30 items in total. Results: The reduction resulted in a 5-item PCS (score 0– 20) and 6-item TSK (score 0– 24). Psychometric properties of the reduced questionnaires were all acceptable as compared with other version (α=0.89 and 0.71, ICC=0.75 and 0.60, r=0.86 and 0.70, MCID=2 and 2 for PCS and TSK, respectively) while keeping the structure and coherence of the long versions. Conclusion: The two reduced versions of the PCS and TSK can be used in CMSP patient. As their administration only requires a few minutes, they can be implemented in outpatient consultation as well as in clinical settings. Keywords: chronic musculoskeletal pain, CMSP, patient-reported outcomes measures, PROMs, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, PCS, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, TSK Chronic pain is a worldwide problem and the source of huge medical and social costs. Prevalence of chronic pain ranges from 11% to 40% in the world's population. 1 In Switzerland, musculoskeletal diseases and injuries are the second leading cause of health costs: 8.7 billion Swiss francs per year (9.5 billion USD). 2,3 Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP) is also a multifactorial phenomenon defined by a complex interaction between biological, psychological and social factors 4 that can lead to a physical deconditioning. 5 Based on this observation, the fear-avoidance model (FAM) 6–10 describes how people with musculoskeletal pain develop a chronic pain through thoughts that increase pain and cause disuse and disability. Psychological processes such as fear of movement and pain catastrophizing seem to be keys factors in the development of chronic pain. 9 Indeed, high level of catastrophizing and kinesiophobia are associated with high level of self-reported and performance-based disability 11–13 as well as perceived pain intensity. 14–17 These factors are implicated in the chronicization of the pain. Thus, their detection is necessary for both research and clinical purposes to assist in clinical-decision making in order to optimize introduction of targeted therapeutic programs based on cognitive behavioral therapies. 18,19 Moreover, measured from the onset of the chronic pain, it may be useful in identifying patients who are at risk of poor outcomes. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), 20 and Tampa -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology