Abstract:The Pelophylax genus comprises two main hybridogenetic systems resulting from hybridization between Pelophylax ridibundus and other species: the P. lessonae-esculentus (LE) system and the P. perezi-grafi (PG) system, whose distribution ranges lie partly (LE) or entirely (PG) outside the natural distribution of P. ridibundus . The introductions and subsequent expansions of P. ridibundus in many areas naturally inhabited by these hybridogenetic systems have led to their decrease or local extinction. One of the major impediments to efficient population surveys and conservation measures for these systems is the difficulties of reliable species identification due to their similar morphology and poorly documented vocalizations, especially for the PG system. Our aim in this work was to design a reliable method of acoustic identification to distinguish the taxa composing the hybridogenetic systems from P. ridibundus and to assess the possibility of separating the PG and LE systems by their vocalizations. Our acoustic identification methods proved highly accurate to separate the PG and LE systems from P. ridibundus but only a fraction of the PG and LE calls can be identified. The Pelophylax genus comprises two main hybridogenetic systems resulting from hybridization between Pelophylax ridibundus and other species: the P. lessonae-esculentus (LE) system and the P. perezi-grafi (PG) system, whose distribution ranges lie partly (LE) or entirely (PG) outside the natural distribution of P. ridibundus . The introductions and subsequent expansions of P. ridibundus in many areas naturally inhabited by these hybridogenetic systems have led to their decrease or local extinction. One of the major impediments to efficient population surveys and conservation measures for these systems is the difficulties of reliable species identification due to their similar morphology and poorly documented vocalizations, especially for the PG system. Our aim in this work was to design a reliable method of acoustic identification to distinguish the taxa composing the hybridogenetic systems from P. ridibundus and to assess the possibility of separating the PG and LE systems by their vocalizations. Our acoustic identification methods proved highly accurate to separate the PG and LE systems from P. ridibundus but only a fraction of the PG and LE calls can be identified. The Pelophylax genus comprises two main hybridogenetic systems resulting from hybridization between Pelophylax ridibundus and other species: the P. lessonae-esculentus (LE) system and the P. perezi-grafi (PG) system, whose distribution ranges lie partly (LE) or entirely (PG) outside the natural distribution of P. ridibundus . The introductions and subsequent expansions of P. ridibundus in many areas naturally inhabited by these hybridogenetic systems have led to their decrease or local extinction. One of the major impediments to efficient population surveys and conservation measures for these systems is the difficulties of reliable species identification due to their similar morphology and poorly documented vocalizations, especially for the PG system. Our aim in this work was to design a reliable method of acoustic identification to distinguish the taxa composing the hybridogenetic systems from P. ridibundus and to assess the possibility of separating the PG and LE systems by their vocalizations. Our acoustic identification methods proved highly accurate to separate the PG and LE systems from P. ridibundus but only a fraction of the PG and LE calls can be identified.

Passive acoustic monitoring and automated detection of the American bullfrog

Effective detection of environmental DNA from the invasive American bullfrog

An Intelligent System for Estimating Frog Community Calling Activity and Species Richness

Poster Abstract: Long-Term Monitoring of Cane-Toads Using Acoustic Sensors

Aquatic soundscape recordings reveal diverse vocalizations and nocturnal activity of an endangered frog

Phenological mismatches mitigate the ecological impact of a biological invader on amphibian communities

Designing better frog call recognition models

Investigation of Acoustic and Visual Features for Frog Call Classification

Detecting Frog Calling Activity Based on Acoustic Eventdetection and Multi-Label Learning

Acoustic animal identification using unsupervised learning

Detection of Anuran Calling Activity in Long Field Recordings for Bio-Acoustic Monitoring

Adaptive Frequency Scaled Wavelet Packet Decomposition for Frog Call Classification

Acoustic Classification of Australian Frogs Based on Enhanced Features and Machine Learning Algorithms

eDNA Metabarcoding Benchmarked towards Conventional Survey Methods in Amphibian Monitoring

Using the ecological significance of animal vocalizations to improve inference in acoustic monitoring programs

Acoustics of parental and hybridogenetic water frogs (Pelophylax: Amphibia: Ranidae): a tool for monitoring an invasive species

Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring

Acoustic Classification of Frog Within-Species and Species-Specific Calls

Image Processing and Classification Procedure for the Analysis of Australian Frog Vocalisations

AnuraSet: A dataset for benchmarking Neotropical anuran calls identification in passive acoustic monitoring

Automated acoustic detection of Geoffroy's spider monkey highlights tipping points of human disturbance