Abstract:Abstract Consumer health protection involves assessing and communicating risks. One-way risk communication may cover information on food safety regulations, food handling practices, and contaminants in food, as well as concerns related to food recalls, outbreaks, or other safety issues. This approach is legitimate if the aim is simply to share information. However, adequate risk communication needs to reach people with the information they need, in a form they can use, and overcome discrepancies between scientific risk assessment and risk perception of laypersons. Often risks that are low from a scientific point of view are overestimated by the public (e.g., pesticide residues, genetically modified food), or the opposite (e.g., foodborne pathogens). Furthermore, foods also have health benefits, and the balance between adverse and beneficial effects is difficult to perceive. Communication related to food should consider all aspects of food choices, including health beliefs, cultural practices, and personal preferences that influence choices and perception of risk and benefits. In this presentation, we will explain how an institute for risk assessment with a mandate for risk communication can apply quantitative and qualitative methods to identify patterns of perception and behaviour. Quantitative methods are used to measure risk perception and communication, qualitative methods to investigate psychological aspects and motivations, and media analyses to reveal topics that are prioritized in the media, which can influence risk perception. We will show how social science methods can be used to understand how consumers respond to risk-benefit information and discuss how common metrics for assessing both risks and benefits are expected to facilitate communication of results of RBA. The challenges that these metrics pose for risk-benefit communication and whether it is to be expected that consumers will be able to accurately weigh between risks and benefits will also be discussed.

A New Methodology to Quantify Risk Perception

Quantitative Calculation Method of the Public Awareness of the Risk and Its Application

Is There a Role for Qualitative Risk Assessment?

Understanding the implications of low knowledge and high uncertainty in risk studies

How Uncertainty Matters Under Risk Neutrality

The role of risk perception for risk management

A Binary Risk Decision Method Based on Quantum Decision Theory

A new method of level-2 uncertainty analysis in risk assessment based on uncertainty theory

Alternative approaches to risk evaluation

How Should a Robot Assess Risk? Towards an Axiomatic Theory of Risk in Robotics

Risk quantization by magnitude and propensity

Exploring subjective risk-benefit perception as an integral component in risk communication

Experimental Riskology: A New Discipline for Risk Analysis

Fuzzy approach and possibility to solve uncertainty weaknesses in conventional quantitative risk assessment

A probability-time&space trade-off model in environmental risk perception

Eliciting Public Risk Preferences in Emergency Situations

A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment

A Safety Risk Assessment Method Considering Epistemic Uncertainty

Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality

A Novel Approach to Quantification of Model Risk for Practitioners

Credibilistic Risk Aversion