Class 1C Antiarrhythmics for Premature Ventricular Complex Suppression in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Mohamad Raad,Haran Yogasundaram,Justice Oranefo,Gustavo Guandalini,Timothy Markman,Matthew Hyman,Robert Schaller,Gregory Supple,Rajat Deo,Saman Nazarian,Michael Riley,David Lin,Fermin Garcia,Sanjay Dixit,Andrew E. Epstein,David Callans,Francis E. Marchlinski,David S. Frankel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.01.021
IF: 6.124
2024-03-29
JACC Clinical Electrophysiology
Abstract:Background Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are common and associated with worse outcomes in patients with heart failure. Class 1C antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) effectively suppress PVCs, but guidelines currently restrict their use in structural heart disease. Objectives This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of class 1C AADs in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Methods All patients with NICM and an ICD treated with flecainide or propafenone at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2014 and 2022 were identified. PVC burden, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and biventricular pacing percentage were compared before and during class 1C AAD treatment. Safety outcomes included sustained atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure admissions, and death. Results We identified 34 patients, 23 receiving flecainide and 11 propafenone. Most patients (62%) had failed other AADs or catheter ablation (68%) prior to class 1C AAD initiation. PVC burden decreased from 20 ± 13% to 6 ± 7% ( P < 0.001), LVEF increased from 33 ± 9% to 37 ± 10% ( P = 0.01), and biventricular pacing percentage increased from 85 ± 9% to 93 ± 7% ( P = 0.01). Sustained ventricular tachycardia (2 vs 9 patients) and admissions for decompensated heart failure (2 vs 3 patients) decreased compared with the 12 months prior to class 1C AAD initiation. Conclusions Class 1C AADs effectively suppressed PVCs in patients with NICM and ICDs, leading to increases in LVEF and biventricular pacing percentage. In this limited sample, their use was safe. Larger studies are needed to confirm the safety of this approach.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?