Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2018

Gary Walsh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4305

IF: 46.9

2018-12-01

Nature Biotechnology

Abstract:Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) continue to reign supreme, although cellular and gene therapies are slowly starting to gather momentum. Burgeoning growth in biosimilars may threaten future brand monopolies for mAbs and other biologics.

biotechnology & applied microbiology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Current Trends in Monoclonal Antibody Development and Manufacturing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76643-0

2010-01-01

Abstract:Monoclonal antibodies represent one of the fastest growing areas of new drug development within the pharmaceutical industry. Several blockbuster products have been approved over the past several years including Rituxan, Remicade, Avastin, Humira, and Herceptin. In addition, over 300 new drugs are currently in clinical trials. With both large, established biotechnology companies and small start-ups involved in the development of this important class of molecules, monoclonal antibodies products will become increasingly prevalent over the next decade. Recently the regulatory review of monoclonal antibodies has been moved from Center for Biologics and Research to the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) division of the US Food and Drug Administration. It is anticipated that CDER will expect a certain minimal amount of data to be provided as more of these products move through the regulatory pipeline. Current Trends in Monoclonal Antibody Development and Manufacturing will provide readers with an understanding of what is currently being done in the industry to develop, manufacture, and release monoclonal antibody products and what will be required for a successful regulatory submission.
Antibodies to watch in 2024

Silvia Crescioli,Hélène Kaplon,Alicia Chenoweth,Lin Wang,Jyothsna Visweswaraiah,Janice M. Reichert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2023.2297450

2024-01-06

mAbs

Abstract:The 'Antibodies to Watch' article series provides an annual summary of commercially sponsored monoclonal antibody therapeutics currently in late-stage clinical development, regulatory review, and those recently granted a first approval in any country. In this installment, we discuss key details for 16 antibody therapeutics granted a first approval in 2023, as of November 17 (lecanemab (Leqembi), rozanolixizumab (RYSTIGGO), pozelimab (VEOPOZ), mirikizumab (Omvoh), talquetamab (Talvey), elranatamab (Elrexfio), epcoritamab (EPKINLY), glofitamab (COLUMVI), retifanlimab (Zynyz), concizumab (Alhemo), lebrikizumab (EBGLYSS), tafolecimab (SINTBILO), narlumosbart (Jinlitai), zuberitamab (Enrexib), adebrelimab (Arelili), and divozilimab (Ivlizi)). We briefly review 26 product candidates for which marketing applications are under consideration in at least one country or region, and 23 investigational antibody therapeutics that are forecast to enter regulatory review by the end of 2024 based on company disclosures. These nearly 50 product candidates include numerous innovative bispecific antibodies, such as odronextamab, ivonescimab, linvoseltamab, zenocutuzumab, and erfonrilimab, and antibody–drug conjugates, such as trastuzumab botidotin, patritumab deruxtecan, datopotamab deruxtecan, and MRG002, as well as a mixture of two immunocytokines (bifikafusp alfa and onfekafusp alfa). We also discuss clinical phase transition and overall approval success rates for antibody therapeutics, which are crucial to the biopharmaceutical industry because these rates inform decisions about resource allocation. Our analyses indicate that these molecules have approval success rates in the range of 14–32%, with higher rates associated with antibodies developed for non-cancer indications. Overall, our data suggest that antibody therapeutic development efforts by the biopharmaceutical industry are robust and increasingly successful.

medicine, research & experimental
The Current Landscape of Antibody-based Therapies in Solid Malignancies

Ashu Shah,Sanchita Rauth,Abhijit Aithal,Sukhwinder Kaur,Koelina Ganguly,Catherine Orzechowski,Grish C Varshney,Maneesh Jain,Surinder K Batra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.52614

IF: 11.6

2021-01-01

Theranostics

Abstract:Over the past three decades, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized the landscape of cancer therapy. Still, this benefit remains restricted to a small proportion of patients due to moderate response rates and resistance emergence. The field has started to embrace better mAb-based formats with advancements in molecular and protein engineering technologies. The development of a therapeutic mAb with long-lasting clinical impact demands a prodigious understanding of target antigen, effective mechanism of action, gene engineering technologies, complex interplay between tumor and host immune system, and biomarkers for prediction of clinical response. This review discusses the various approaches used by mAbs for tumor targeting and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance that is not only caused by the heterogeneity of tumor antigen, but also the resistance imposed by tumor microenvironment (TME), including inefficient delivery to the tumor, alteration of effector functions in the TME, and Fc-gamma receptor expression diversity and polymorphism. Further, this article provides a perspective on potential strategies to overcome these barriers and how diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers are being used in predicting response to mAb-based therapies. Overall, understanding these interdependent parameters can improve the current mAb-based formulations and develop novel mAb-based therapeutics for achieving durable clinical outcomes in a large subset of patients.
Can next-generation antibodies offset biosimilar competition?

Asher Mullard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3749

IF: 112.288

2012-06-01

Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Abstract:With the first biosimilar version of a monoclonal antibody now under regulatory review in the European Union, which R&D strategies are innovators relying on to counteract competition?

pharmacology & pharmacy,biotechnology & applied microbiology
Monoclonal antibodies: From magic bullet to precision weapon

Hassan Aboul-Ella,Asmaa Gohar,Aya Ahmed Ali,Lina M Ismail,Adham Ezz El-Regal Mahmoud,Walid F Elkhatib,Heba Aboul-Ella

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43556-024-00210-1

2024-10-11

Abstract:Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are used to prevent, detect, and treat a broad spectrum of non-communicable and communicable diseases. Over the past few years, the market for mAbs has grown exponentially with an expected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.07% from 2024 (237.64 billion USD estimated at the end of 2023) to 2033 (679.03 billion USD expected by the end of 2033). Ever since the advent of hybridoma technology introduced in 1975, antibody-based therapeutics were realized using murine antibodies which further progressed into humanized and fully human antibodies, reducing the risk of immunogenicity. Some benefits of using mAbs over conventional drugs include a drastic reduction in the chances of adverse reactions, interactions between drugs, and targeting specific proteins. While antibodies are very efficient, their higher production costs impede the process of commercialization. However, their cost factor has been improved by developing biosimilar antibodies as affordable versions of therapeutic antibodies. Along with the recent advancements and innovations in antibody engineering have helped and will furtherly help to design bio-better antibodies with improved efficacy than the conventional ones. These novel mAb-based therapeutics are set to revolutionize existing drug therapies targeting a wide spectrum of diseases, thereby meeting several unmet medical needs. This review provides comprehensive insights into the current fundamental landscape of mAbs development and applications and the key factors influencing the future projections, advancement, and incorporation of such promising immunotherapeutic candidates as a confrontation approach against a wide list of diseases, with a rationalistic mentioning of any limitations facing this field.
Recent Advances in the Development of Monoclonal Antibodies and Next-Generation Antibodies

Rohit Singh,Pankaj Chandley,Soma Rohatgi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/immunohorizons.2300102

2023-12-01

ImmunoHorizons

Abstract:Abstract mAbs are highly indispensable tools for diagnostic, prophylactic, and therapeutic applications. The first technique, hybridoma technology, was based on fusion of B lymphocytes with myeloma cells, which resulted in generation of single mAbs against a specific Ag. Along with hybridoma technology, several novel and alternative methods have been developed to improve mAb generation, ranging from electrofusion to the discovery of completely novel technologies such as B cell immortalization; phage, yeast, bacterial, ribosome, and mammalian display systems; DNA/RNA encoded Abs; single B cell technology; transgenic animals; and artificial intelligence/machine learning. This commentary outlines the evolution, methodology, advantages, and limitations of various mAb production techniques. Furthermore, with the advent of next-generation Ab technologies such as single-chain variable fragments, nanobodies, bispecific Abs, Fc-engineered Abs, Ab biosimilars, Ab mimetics, and Ab-drug conjugates, the healthcare and pharmaceutical sectors have become resourceful to develop highly specific mAb treatments against various diseases such as cancer and autoimmune and infectious diseases.

English Else
Antibodies to watch in 2015

Janice M Reichert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/19420862.2015.988944

mAbs

Abstract:The commercial pipeline of recombinant antibody therapeutics is robust and dynamic. As of early December 2014, a total of 6 such products (vedolizumab, siltuximab, ramucirumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, blinatumomab) were granted first marketing approvals in 2014. As discussed in this perspective on antibodies in late-stage development, the outlook for additional approvals, potentially still in 2014 and certainly in 2015, is excellent as marketing applications for 7 antibody therapeutics (secukinumab, evolocumab, mepolizumab, dinutuximab, nivolumab, blinatumomab, necitumumab) are undergoing a first regulatory review in the EU or US. Of the 39 novel mAbs currently in Phase 3 studies, a marketing application for one (alirocumab) may be submitted in late 2014, and marketing application submissions for at least 4 (reslizumab, ixekizumab, ocrelizumab, obiltoxaximab) are expected in 2015. Other 'antibodies to watch' are those in Phase 3 studies with estimated primary completion dates in late 2014 or 2015, which includes 13 for non-cancer indications (brodalumab, bimagrumab, bococizumab, MABp1, gevokizumab, dupilumab, sirukumab, sarilumab, tildrakizumab, guselkumab, epratuzumab, combination of actoxumab + bezlotoxumab, romosozumab) and 2 (racotumomab and clivatuzumab tetraxetan) undergoing evaluation as treatments for cancer. In addition to the novel antibody therapeutics mentioned, biosimilar infliximab and biosimilar trastuzumab are 'antibodies to watch' in 2015 because of their potential for entry into the US market and regulatory review, respectively.
The history of monoclonal antibody development – Progress, remaining challenges and future innovations

Justin K.H. Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2014.09.001

2014-12-01

Annals of Medicine and Surgery

Abstract:As medicine progresses into a new era of personalised therapy, the use of monoclonal antibodies to treat a wide range of diseases lies at the heart of this new forefront. Since the licencing of the first monoclonal antibody for clinical use 30 years ago, the monoclonal antibody industry has expanded exponentially and is now valued at billions of dollars. With major advances in genetic sequencing and biomedical research, much research into monoclonal antibodies now focuses on identifying new targets for development and maximising their efficacy for use in clinical practice. However, a balance has to be struck with regards to reducing numbers of side-effects and overall economic cost, which arguably somewhat blighted their early clinical and commercial successes. Nowadays, there are approximately 30 monoclonal antibodies that have been approved for use in clinical practice with many more currently being tested in clinical trials. Some of the current major limitations include: the use of inefficient models for generation, a lack of efficacy and issues of cost-effectiveness. Some of the current research focuses on ways to improve the efficacy of existing monoclonal antibodies through optimising their effects and the addition of beneficial modifications. This review will focus on the history of monoclonal antibody development - how it has increasingly moved away from using laborious animal models to a more effective phage display system, some of the major drawbacks from a clinical and economical point of view and future innovations that are currently being researched to maximise their effectiveness for future clinical use.
Monoclonal Antibodies: Emergence, Present and Outlook

Ji Gao,Juan He,Qingwen Wang,Wanli Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/tb-2020-0490

2020-01-01

Abstract:Monoclonal antibodies are of great use in research and clinic. The first monoclonal antibody production method, hybridoma technology, was marked in the paper "Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity" by Milstein and Kohler in 1975 in Nature. Based on that paper, we took a retrospective and forward look of this technique. In the early research of antibodies and B cells, the low specificity and bad reproductivity of polyclonal antibodies called for new methods to produce highly specific antibodies. Fortunately, the scientists encountered the key prerequisites of the hybridoma method: (1) Mouse multiple myeloma cell lines, which can secrete antibodies and infinitely reproduce in vitro; (2) SRBC (sheep red blood cell) plates that can screen the cells secreteing anti-SRBC antibodies; (3) proper cell fusion methods like Sendai virus and PEG. Based on all these materials and methods, Milstein and Kohler fused spleen cells of immunized mice with mouse myeloma cell line P3-X67Ag8 by inactivated Sendai virus and screened to clone the fused cells that can secrete anti-SRBC antibodies. They also used HAT medium to ensure that only fused cells from spleen cells and myeloma cells can survive. In this way, they obtained the immortal cells that can produce a single type of antibody with a predefined antigen-specificity, or say, hybridoma cells that can produce monoclonal antibodies. This powerful tool of hybridoma was quickly applied and improved. Milstein and Kohler were awarded the Nobel prize and Lasker award in 1984. Despite the great commercial potential of hybridoma in medication and science research, Milstein and Kohler did not patent the method, making it free to use by anyone in the world. The monoclonal antibodies produced by hybridoma were proved highly versatile in the laboratory. Besides great insights provided to us in basic immunology research, they become the indispensable tool to precisely qualify, quantify, and localize macromolecule in all fields of research. Fluorescence imaging, Western blotting, flow cytometry and microarray methods all make use of monoclonal antibodies. Upon chimera, humanized and human monoclonal antibody development, the application and success of monoclonal antibodies on the biopharma market are even greater. Monoclonal antibody medicines to treat cancer and autoimmune diseases are making billions of dollars every year. Notably, among these medicines, anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 are awarded Nobel prize in 2018 as anti-tumor immune checkpoint inhibitors. Monoclonal antibody medicines for contagious diseases like Ebola also shows advantages over others. For the new outbreak of COVID-19 around the world, monoclonal antibodies are also promising in offering new cures. Presently, the production of monoclonal antibodies is no longer solely dependent on hybridoma technology. Transgenic and recombinant DNA technology are creating new possibilities in this ever-growing field.
Antibodies to watch in 2016

Janice M Reichert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2015.1125583

mAbs

Abstract:The number of novel antibody therapeutics that received first marketing approvals in 2015 met expectations, with 6 (alirocumab (Praluent®), evolocumab (Repatha®), daratumumab (Darzalex®), dinutuximab (Unituxin®), idarucizumab (Praxbind®), mepolizumab (Nucala®)) granted first approvals as of mid-November*. Seven novel antibody therapeutics (begelomab, brodalumab, elotuzumab, ixekizumab, necitumumab, obiltoxaximab, reslizumab) are in regulatory review, and thus a similar number, if not more, are projected to gain first approvals in 2016. Commercial late-stage antibody therapeutics development exceeded expectations by increasing from 39 candidates in Phase 3 studies as of late 2014 to 53 as of late 2015. Of the 53 candidates, transitions to regulatory review by the end of 2016 are projected for 8 (atezolizumab, benralizumab, bimagrumab, durvalumab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, lebrikizumab, ocrelizumab, tremelimumab). Other "antibodies to watch" include 15 candidates (bavituximab, bococizumab, dupilumab, fasinumab, fulranumab, gevokizumab, guselkumab, ibalizumab, LY2951742, onartuzumab, REGN2222, roledumab, romosozumab, sirukumab, Xilonix) undergoing evaluation in Phase 3 studies that have estimated primary completion dates in 2016. As evidenced by the antibody therapeutics discussed in this perspective, the biopharmaceutical industry has a highly active late-stage clinical pipeline that may deliver numerous new products to the global market in the near future. *See Note added in proof for updates through December 31, 2015.
Sustaining competition for biosimilars on the pharmacy benefit: Use it or lose it

Stanton R Mehr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.6.600

Abstract:Congress passed the Biologic Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, specifically to offer market competition as a counterweight to the rising costs of biologic medicines. As of April 15, 2024, 49 biosimilars have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 15 biologic categories. Biosimilar competition has been undeniably successful: Through 2022, biosimilars have saved the US health system $23.6 billion, without significant care disruption or reduced quality. Through 2023, adalimumab biosimilar competition has added an additional $6.5 billion to this total, primarily through greater rebates from the reference manufacturer. Despite launching at discounts as great as 85%, adalimumab biosimilars have not been given preferred formulary positioning in the vast majority of cases and have thus gained only 3% of market share through 2023, largely because of payers' and pharmacy benefit managers' preference for rebates over discounts. This situation may negatively influence future biosimilar development, posing a threat to a biosimilar pipeline that represents hundreds of billions in savings over the next 10 years.
A pivotal decade for bispecific antibodies?

Marlena Surowka,Christian Klein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2024.2321635

2024-03-13

mAbs

Abstract:Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are a class of antibodies that can mediate novel mechanisms of action compared to monospecific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Since the discovery of mAbs and their adoption as therapeutic agents in the 1980s and 1990s, the development of bsAbs has held substantial appeal. Nevertheless, only three bsAbs (catumaxomab, blinatumomab, emicizumab) were approved through the end of 2020. However, since then, 11 bsAbs received regulatory agency approvals, of which nine (amivantamab, tebentafusp, mosunetuzumab, cadonilimab, teclistamab, glofitamab, epcoritamab, talquetamab, elranatamab) were approved for the treatment of cancer and two (faricimab, ozoralizumab) in non-oncology indications. Notably, of the 13 currently approved bsAbs, two, emicizumab and faricimab, have achieved blockbuster status, showing the promise of this novel class of therapeutics. In the 2020s, the approval of additional bsAbs can be expected in hematological malignancies, solid tumors and non-oncology indications, establishing bsAbs as essential part of the therapeutic armamentarium.

medicine, research & experimental
Insights from capillary electrophoresis approaches for characterization of monoclonal antibodies and antibody drug conjugates in the period 2016-2018

Antony Lechner,Jérémie Giorgetti,Rabah Gahoual,Alain Beck,Emmanuelle Leize-Wagner,Yannis-Nicolas François

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.05.014

2019-08-01

Abstract:Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their related products as antibody-drug-conjugates (ADCs) or biosimilars represent a constantly growing class of molecules therapeutic proteins used as treatment against numerous diseases. These compounds can undergo several modifications which could alter the efficiency of treatments. In this context, several analytical methods were designed to deliver a comprehensive structural characterization and guarantee the quality of biotherapeutics. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is considered today as a major technique for the analysis of biotherapeutics due to benefic characteristics as high resolution separation and miniaturized format. Different CE modes have been developed to characterize mAbs at different levels such as capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE), capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF), and capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). Recent developments in CE-mass spectrometry (MS) coupling assessed this technology as a promising tool to obtain high level structural characterization of biopharmaceuticals. Moreover, upcoming techniques such as 2D CE-MS and microfluidic systems are now emerging to offer new possibilities beyond actual limits. This review will be dedicated to discuss the state-of-the-art CE-based methods for the characterization of mAbs and ADCs in the period 2016-2018.
The therapeutic monoclonal antibody market

Dawn M Ecker,Susan Dana Jones,Howard L Levine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/19420862.2015.989042

2015-01-02

mAbs

Abstract:Since the commercialization of the first therapeutic monoclonal antibody product in 1986, this class of biopharmaceutical products has grown significantly so that, as of November 10, 2014, forty-seven monoclonal antibody products have been approved in the US or Europe for the treatment of a variety of diseases, and many of these products have also been approved for other global markets. At the current approval rate of ∼ four new products per year, ∼ 70 monoclonal antibody products will be on the market by 2020, and combined world-wide sales will be nearly $125 billion.

medicine, research & experimental
Antibody Conjugates-Recent Advances and Future Innovations

Donmienne Leung,Jacqueline M. Wurst,Tao Liu,Ruben M. Martinez,Amita Datta-Mannan,Yiqing Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antib9010002

2020-01-01

Antibodies

Abstract:Monoclonal antibodies have evolved from research tools to powerful therapeutics in the past 30 years. Clinical success rates of antibodies have exceeded expectations, resulting in heavy investment in biologics discovery and development in addition to traditional small molecules across the industry. However, protein therapeutics cannot drug targets intracellularly and are limited to soluble and cell-surface antigens. Tremendous strides have been made in antibody discovery, protein engineering, formulation, and delivery devices. These advances continue to push the boundaries of biologics to enable antibody conjugates to take advantage of the target specificity and long half-life from an antibody, while delivering highly potent small molecule drugs. While the "magic bullet" concept produced the first wave of antibody conjugates, these entities were met with limited clinical success. This review summarizes the advances and challenges in the field to date with emphasis on antibody conjugation, linker-payload chemistry, novel payload classes, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME), and product developability. We discuss lessons learned in the development of oncology antibody conjugates and look towards future innovations enabling other therapeutic indications.
Quantum leap of monoclonal antibody (mAb) discovery and development in the COVID-19 era

Simone Pecetta,Oretta Finco,Anja Seubert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2020.101427

IF: 10.671

2020-08-01

Seminars in Immunology

Abstract:<p>In recent years the global market for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) became a multi-billion-dollar business. This success is mainly driven by treatments in the oncology and autoimmune space. Instead, development of effective mAbs against infectious diseases has been lagging behind. For years the high production cost and limited efficacy have blocked broader application of mAbs in the infectious disease space, which instead has been dominated for almost a century by effective and cheap antibiotics and vaccines. Only very few mAbs against RSV, anthrax, <em>Clostridium difficile</em> or rabies have reached the market. This is about to change. The development of urgently needed and highly effective mAbs as preventive and therapeutic treatments against a variety of pathogens is gaining traction. Vast advances in mAb isolation, engineering and production have entirely shifted the cost-efficacy balance. MAbs against devastating diseases like Ebola, HIV and other complex pathogens are now within reach. This trend is further accelerated by ongoing or imminent health crises like COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), where antibodies could be the last resort. In this review we will retrace the history of antibodies from the times of serum therapy to modern mAbs and lay out how the current run for effective treatments against COVID-19 will lead to a quantum leap in scientific, technological and health care system innovation around mAb treatments for infectious diseases.</p>

immunology
How Biologics Have Changed the Drug Discovery Landscape

Paul McGonigle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-061724-080811

2024-11-09

The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Abstract:Advances in molecular biology and molecular genetics as well as major scientific breakthroughs in immunology and oncology have led to the rapid growth of biologic therapeutics. Their success has resulted in significant changes to virtually every step in the drug discovery and development process. Biologics are produced by living organisms, and screening libraries are generated by immunization or phage display. Lead optimization utilizes sophisticated protein engineering to improve drug-like properties and targeting specificity. The manufacturing process for biologics is complex and requires highly specialized facilities. Determination of pharmacology and safety must overcome the complications associated with species specificity. Initial clinical testing must proceed more slowly and carefully due to the limited predictive utility of preclinical data. In summary, the drug discovery and development process has been dramatically altered by biologic therapeutics and will continue to evolve with the introduction of messenger RNA–based therapeutics and the application of artificial intelligence.

pharmacology & pharmacy,toxicology
Monoclonal antibodies: technologies for early discovery and engineering

Patrick J. Kennedy,Carla Oliveira,Pedro L. Granja,Bruno Sarmento

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2017.1357002

IF: 9.062

2017-08-08

Critical Reviews in Biotechnology

Abstract:Antibodies are essential in modern life sciences biotechnology. Their architecture and diversity allow for high specificity and affinity to a wide array of biochemicals. Combining monoclonal antibody (mAb) technology with recombinant DNA and protein expression links antibody genotype with phenotype. Yet, the ability to select and screen for high affinity binders from recombinantly-displayed, combinatorial libraries unleashes the true power of mAbs and a flood of clinical applications. The identification of novel antibodies can be accomplished by a myriad of in vitro display technologies from the proven (e.g. phage) to the emerging (e.g. mammalian cell and cell-free) based on affinity binding as well as function. Lead candidates can be further engineered for increased affinity and half-life, reduced immunogenicity and/or enhanced manufacturing, and storage capabilities. This review begins with antibody biology and how the structure and genetic machinery relate to function, diversity, and in vivo affinity maturation and follows with the general requirements of (therapeutic) antibody discovery and engineering with an emphasis on in vitro display technologies. Throughout, we highlight where antibody biology inspires technology development and where high-throughput, "big data" and in silico strategies are playing an increasing role. Antibodies dominate the growing class of targeted therapeutics, alone or as bioconjugates. However, their versatility extends to research, diagnostics, and beyond.

biotechnology & applied microbiology
Novel approaches to enable equitable access to monoclonal antibodies in low- and middle-income countries

Shelly Malhotra,Anne-Isabelle Cameron,Dzintars Gotham,Esteban Burrone,Peter J Gardner,Colleen Loynachan,Sébastien Morin,Cherise P Scott,Carmen Pérez-Casas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003418

2024-07-01

Abstract:Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are revolutionizing management of non-communicable diseases in high-income countries and are increasingly being advanced for a range of infectious diseases (IDs). However, access to existing mAbs is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and investment in developing fit-for-purpose mAbs for IDs that disproportionately affect LMICs has been limited. Underlying these access barriers are systemic challenges, including a lack of commercial incentives to target LMIC markets and complexity in manufacturing and regulatory processes. Novel strategies are needed to overcome systemic access barriers for mAbs. We outline key areas where new approaches could address these barriers, based on a multistakeholder consultation in March 2023. Three disease-market archetypes are identified to guide thinking about business models tailored to different contexts. New business models are needed to incentivize development and manufacturing of ID mAbs and to ensure mAbs are optimized with a target product profile and cost of goods that enable use in diverse LMIC settings. Lessons can be applied from voluntary licensing strategies and product development partnerships that have shown success in catalysing development and affordable supply for a range of infectious diseases. Technology transfer will be key to expand LMIC research and manufacturing capacity and to enable sustainable and diversified supply. Improved market intelligence, demand aggregation mechanisms, and portfolio-based manufacturing models could be used to de-risk commercial investment and establish a sustainable manufacturing ecosystem for affordable mAbs. Novel regulatory approaches and robust technology transfer may reduce data requirements and timelines for biosimilar approvals. Trailblazer products, with coordinated "end-to-end" support from funders, can demonstrate proof of concept for pathways to accessible mAbs across a broader range of LMICs. Research funders; local, regional, global health agencies; and, private sector partners should commit to implementing innovative partnerships and end-to-end strategies that enable equitable access to mAbs for infectious diseases in LMICs.
Building better monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics

George J. Weiner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3930

IF: 78.5

2015-05-22

Nature Reviews Cancer

Abstract:Key PointsMonoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapeutics are now standard in the treatment of cancer, and the numbers and varieties of clinically applicable mAb-based approaches continue to grow.Effective mAb-based treatments of cancer include directly targeting the cancer, altering the host response to the cancer, delivering cytotoxic moieties to the cancer and retargeting T cells towards the cancer.mAb-based treatments that directly target the cancer mediate their effects through direct signalling, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-mediated lysis. Differentiating which of these mechanisms is most important for a given mAb can be difficult but is important when working to identify better mAb-based treatments.mAb-based treatments that alter the host response can alter tumour angiogenesis or the T cell response through T cell checkpoint blockade. Checkpoint-blockade mAbs are showing particular promise.mAb-based treatments that deliver cytotoxic agents to the cancer include radioimmunotherapy and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). ADCs are complex because of the need to match the target cancer to the right mAb, linker and drug, but early results are promising and many new ADCs are in development.mAb-based treatments that retarget T cells towards cancer include bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Both approaches are logistically challenging but have demonstrated exciting early results, particularly in B cell malignancies.Each of these approaches has advantages and disadvantages that need to be considered in their development and evaluation.Rapid progress is taking place in the development of new agents and the testing of new approaches, both alone and in combination, in each of these areas.

oncology

Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2018

Current Trends in Monoclonal Antibody Development and Manufacturing

Antibodies to watch in 2024

The Current Landscape of Antibody-based Therapies in Solid Malignancies

Can next-generation antibodies offset biosimilar competition?

Monoclonal antibodies: From magic bullet to precision weapon

Recent Advances in the Development of Monoclonal Antibodies and Next-Generation Antibodies

Antibodies to watch in 2015

The history of monoclonal antibody development – Progress, remaining challenges and future innovations

Monoclonal Antibodies: Emergence, Present and Outlook

Antibodies to watch in 2016

Sustaining competition for biosimilars on the pharmacy benefit: Use it or lose it

A pivotal decade for bispecific antibodies?

Insights from capillary electrophoresis approaches for characterization of monoclonal antibodies and antibody drug conjugates in the period 2016-2018

The therapeutic monoclonal antibody market

Antibody Conjugates-Recent Advances and Future Innovations

Quantum leap of monoclonal antibody (mAb) discovery and development in the COVID-19 era

How Biologics Have Changed the Drug Discovery Landscape

Monoclonal antibodies: technologies for early discovery and engineering

Novel approaches to enable equitable access to monoclonal antibodies in low- and middle-income countries

Building better monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics