Abstract:In recent years, the burgeoning data market has witnessed a surge in data exchange, playing a pivotal role in augmenting the predictive and decision-making capabilities of machine learning . Despite these advancements, persistent concerns surrounding data privacy have resulted in stringent limitations on data sharing and trading. Consequently, the data market is undergoing a transformative shift from pricing individual datasets to pricing the models themselves. The challenge of training high-performance machine learning models with restricted data from a single client is substantial. Federated learning has emerged as a popular solution, allowing collaborative model training without the need to transfer client data beyond local environments. However, training federated models within a data market introduces several challenges, including the effective selection of clients for model training and the optimization of utility through model pricing. In response to these challenges, we propose the Tiered Federated Learning Client Selection Algorithm (TiFLCS-MAR), employing a multi-attribute reverse auction approach. Integrated into the federated learning framework, TiFLCS-MAR excels at the comprehensive evaluation of client attributes, employing a tiered strategy to mitigate issues arising from client heterogeneity. Additionally, we introduce the TiFLCS-MAR Pricing Framework (TiFLCS-MARP), leveraging Nash equilibrium principles to maximize profitability for both clients and servers. Our framework accommodates the heterogeneity of diverse clients, efficiently selecting suitable candidates from a large pool, thereby boosting training efficiency and curbing model pricing costs. Empirical evidence showcases the efficacy of federated training with TiFLCS-MAR, demonstrating nearly double the convergence speed and a 5-10 percentage point improvement in accuracy across real and synthetic datasets. Furthermore, when compared to three baseline algorithms, TiFLCS-MARP substantially increases central server revenue by factors of 1.99, 27.05, and 1.78, highlighting its superior performance in the data market context.

Duopoly Business Competition in Cross-Silo Federated Learning

Technical Report: Coopetition in Heterogeneous Cross-Silo Federated Learning

Federated Learning and Free-riding in a Competitive Market

Cross-Silo Federated Learning: Challenges and Opportunities

How to Collaborate: Towards Maximizing the Generalization Performance in Cross-Silo Federated Learning

MarS-FL: Enabling Competitors to Collaborate in Federated Learning

Collaboration in Federated Learning With Differential Privacy: A Stackelberg Game Analysis

Defection-Free Collaboration between Competitors in a Learning System

TiFLCS-MARP: Client selection and model pricing for federated learning in data markets

Adaptive incentive for cross-silo federated learning: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach

Cross-Silo Federated Learning Across Divergent Domains with Iterative Parameter Alignment

A Profit-Maximizing Data Marketplace with Differentially Private Federated Learning under Price Competition

Free-Rider and Conflict Aware Collaboration Formation for Cross-Silo Federated Learning

Federated Learning in Competitive EV Charging Market

Towards cross-silo federated learning for corporate organisations

FL-Market: Trading Private Models in Federated Learning

Toward Free-Riding Attack on Cross-Silo Federated Learning Through Evolutionary Game

Collaboration in Participant-Centric Federated Learning: A Game-Theoretical Perspective

Strategic Collusion of LLM Agents: Market Division in Multi-Commodity Competitions

FedCompetitors: Harmonious Collaboration in Federated Learning with Competing Participants

PAGE: Equilibrate Personalization and Generalization in Federated Learning