Abstract:The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that people of all ages take regular and adequate physical activity. If unable to meet the recommendations due to health conditions, international guidance advises being as physically active as possible. Evidence from community interventions of physical activity indicate that people living with medical conditions are sometimes excluded from participation in studies. In this review, we considered the effects of activity‐promoting interventions on physical activity and well‐being in studies, as well as any adverse events experienced by participants living with inherited or acquired neuromuscular diseases (NMDs). To assess the effects of interventions designed to promote physical activity in people with NMD compared with no intervention or alternative interventions. On 30 April 2020, we searched Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.Gov. WHO ICTRP was not accessible at the time. We considered randomised or quasi‐randomised trials, including cross‐over trials, of interventions designed to promote physical activity in people with NMD compared to no intervention or alternative interventions. We specifically included studies that reported physical activity as an outcome measure. Our main focus was studies in which promoting physical activity was a stated aim but we also included studies in which physical activity was assessed as a secondary or exploratory outcome. We used standard Cochrane procedures. The review included 13 studies (795 randomised participants from 12 studies; number of participants unclear in one study) of different interventions to promote physical activity. Most studies randomised a minority of invited participants. No study involved children or adolescents and nine studies reported minimal entry criteria for walking. Participants had one of nine inherited or acquired NMDs. Types of intervention included structured physical activity support, exercise support (as a specific form of physical activity), and behaviour change support that included physical activity or exercise. Only one included study clearly reported that the aim of intervention was to increase physical activity. Other studies reported or planned to analyse the effects of intervention on physical activity as a secondary or exploratory outcome measure. Six studies did not report results for physical activity outcomes, or the data were not usable. We judged 10 of the 13 included studies at high or unclear risk of bias from incomplete physical activity outcome reporting. We did not perform a meta‐analysis for any comparison because of differences in interventions and in usual care. We also found considerable variation in how studies reported physical activity as an outcome measure. The studies that reported physical activity measurement did not always clearly report intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis or whether final assessments occurred during or after intervention. Based on prespecified measures, we included three comparisons in our summary of findings. A physical activity programme (weight‐bearing) compared to no physical activity programme One study involved adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and reported weekly duration of walking during and at the end of a one‐year intervention using a StepWatch ankle accelerometer. Based on the point estimate and low‐certainty evidence, intervention may have led to an important increase in physical activity per week; however, the 95% confidence interval (CI) included the possibility of no difference or an effect in either direction at three months (mean difference (MD) 34 minutes per week, 95% CI –92.19 to 160.19; 69 participants), six months (MD 68 minutes per week, 95% CI –55.35 to 191.35; 74 participants), and 12 months (MD 49 minutes per week, 95% CI –75.73 to 173.73; 70 participants). Study‐reported effect estimates for foot lesions and full‐thickness ulcers also included the possibility of no difference, a higher, or lower risk with intervention. A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme compared to no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme One study involved adults with DPN and reported duration of walking over 48 hours at the end of four weeks' intervention using a t‐shirt embedded PAMSys sensor. It was not possible to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the intervention from the very low‐certainty evidence (MD –0.64 hours per 48 hours, 95% CI –2.42 to 1.13; 25 participants). We were also unable to draw conclusions about impact on the Physical Component Score (PCS) for quality of life (MD 0.24 points, 95% CI –5.98 to 6.46; 35 participants; very low‐certainty evidence), although intervention may have made little or no difference to the Mental Component Score (MCS) for quality of life (MD 5.10 points, 95% CI –0.58 to 10.78; 35 participants; low‐certainty evidence). A functional exercise programme co -Abstract Truncated-

'You have to make it accessible and it's really not': priority actions to support disabled people to be physically active

Benefits of sport and physical activity for the disabled: implications for the individual and for society

Supporting movement and physical activity in people with psychosis: A qualitative exploration of the carer perspective

Perceptions and experiences of health professionals when supporting adults with stroke to engage in physical activity

Strategies to improve access to physical activity opportunities for people with physical disabilities

Accessibility of Fitness Facilities and Physical Activity Participation: A Comparison of Disabled Athletes and Disabled People

Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease.

Exploring Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents with Disabilities: A Bibliometric Review of Current Status, Guidelines, Perceived Barriers, and Facilitators and Future Directions

Participation in physical activity by adolescents with physical disability: cross-sectional snapshot and future priorities ("Youth Experience Matters" protocol)

Biopsychosocial determinants of physical activity and healthy eating for people with disability living in supported accommodation: A systematic review of qualitative research

Perceived barriers and facilitators for increasing the physical activity of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy: a focus group study

Barriers to physical activity in university students with disabilities: Differences by sociodemographic variables

Tackling physical inactivity and inequalities: implementing a whole systems approach to transform community provision for disabled people and people with long-term health conditions

Promotion of physical activity by health professionals in a sample of six public hospitals: A cross sectional study

The Development and Evaluation of a Participant Led Physical Activity Intervention for People with Disabilities Who Intend to Become More Active

Barriers and facilitators to physical activity among children, adolescents, and young adults with cystic fibrosis: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research

Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty

Barriers and facilitators to physical activity and further digital exercise intervention among inactive British adolescents in secondary schools: a qualitative study with physical education teachers

Identifying the top 10 priorities of adolescents with a physical disability regarding participation in physical activity: A Delphi study

Reflections on Physical Activity and Health: What Should We Recommend?

INVESTIGATION OF CONSTRAINS TOWARD PARTICIPATION IN SPORTS AND LEISURE ACTIVITIES OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES