Species variations in muscle stem cell-mediated immunosuppression on T cells

Shisong Liu,Pengbo Hou,Weijia Zhang,Muqiu Zuo,Zhanhong Liu,Tingting Wang,Yipeng Zhou,Wangwang Chen,Chao Feng,Bo Hu,Jiankai Fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73684-2
IF: 4.6
2024-10-10
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Muscle stem cells (MuSCs) are effective in treating inflammatory diseases driven by overactive innate immune responses, such as colitis and acute lung injury, due to their immunomodulatory properties. However, their potential in treating diseases driven by adaptive immune responses is still uncertain. When primed with inflammatory cytokines, MuSCs strongly suppressed T cell activation and proliferation in vitro in co-culture with activated splenocytes or peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Systemic administration of MuSCs from both mice and humans alleviated pathologies in mice with concanavalin A-induced acute liver injury, characterized by hyperactivated T lymphocytes. Importantly, MuSCs showed significant species-specific differences in their immunoregulatory functions. In mouse MuSCs (mMuSCs), deletion or inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) reduced their immunosuppressive activity, and absence of iNOS negated their therapeutic effects in liver injury. Conversely, in human MuSCs (hMuSCs), knockdown or inhibition of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) eliminated their immunosuppressive effects, and loss of IDO function rendered hMuSCs ineffective in treating liver injury in mice. These results reveal significant species-specific differences in the mechanisms by which MuSCs mediate T cell immunosuppression. Mouse MuSCs rely on iNOS, while human MuSCs depend on IDO expression. This highlights the need to consider species-specific responses when evaluating MuSCs' therapeutic potential in immune-related disorders.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?