Outpatient Navigation Increases Enrollment In Serious Illness Services For Outpatients With Chronic Heart Failure

Joy Duer,Juhi Saxena,Hongmei Yang,Emily Bowers,Bridget Hiller,John Barkley,Priyesh Patel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.138
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Intro Heart failure is a common and costly medical illness with poor prognosis, with as low as 25% survival rate at 5 years post-index hospitalization. Many serious illness services (SIS) such as clinic-based palliative care, home based palliative care, hospice, and nurse care management have been developed to improve quality of life and reduce acute care utilization. However, these services remain underutilized. We evaluated how care navigation by a Serious Illness Navigator (SIN) impacts referral to and uptake of outpatient SIS and the effect on overall acute care utilization (ED visits and hospitalizations). Methods This was a prospective cohort study with two arms: Arm 1 consisted of a Heart Failure-trained MD and APP with access to an outpatient SIN who could navigate and enroll patients in SIS; Arm 2 consisted of a HF MD and APP without SIN access and used the standard referral processes for enrollment in SIS. All providers were educated on local SIS available for HF patients. Referrals to SIN did not require a specific SIS referral, allowing the SIN to determine eligibility for appropriate services. We assessed SIN/SIS referrals and outcomes at 6 months including acute care utilization, mortality, and participation in advanced care planning. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables and t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum for numerical variables. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for baseline differences. Results Compared to patients of providers without SIN access (n=447), patients of providers with SIN access (n=569) were older (72 (61-79) vs 67 (55-76), p<0.001), had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (CCI: 8 (5-10) vs 7 (4-9), p=0.003), and had higher ejection fraction (EF: 45% (25-55) vs 35% (24-50), p<0.001). Approximately 14% (n= 79) of patients were referred to SIN in Arm 1. Overall, referral and uptake of SIS were greater among patients with SIN access vs. without SIN access (Table 1), even after adjustment for baseline risk (SIS referrals: adjusted OR 2.03 (95% CI: 1.06 - 4.06), SIS acceptance: adj OR 2.32 (95% CI: 1.03 - 5.79)). Matched pairs analysis demonstrated that patients admitted to SIS from both arms vs matched counterparts had numerically less acute care utilization, more days away from acute care, lower mortality, and greater advanced care planning; however, the differences were not statistically significant due to small sample size. Conclusions Access to a Serious Illness Navigator increases referrals and admission rates to Serious Illness Services. Larger studies are needed to determine the impact on clinical outcomes and acute care utilization.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?