Endocardial repolarization dispersion in BrS: A novel automatic algorithm for mapping activation recovery interval

Sara Latrofa,Valentina Hartwig,Lorenzo Bachi,Pasquale Notarstefano,Silvia Garibaldi,Luca Panchetti,Martina Nesti,Paolo Seghetti,Umberto Startari,Gianluca Mirizzi,Maria Sole Morelli,Martina Modena,Andrea Mazzanti,Michele Emdin,Alberto Giannoni,Andrea Rossi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16244
IF: 2.7
2024-03-15
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Abstract:Thirty‐nine spontaneous type‐1 patients affected by Brugada syndrome (BrS) and 4 controls underwent endocardial mapping (left panel). Activation recovery interval (ARI) calculated for each point was used to recreate ARI maps (central panel), then correlated with right ventricular activation time and Tpeak‐Tend interval (Tpec) (right panel). Introduction Repolarization dispersion in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) contributes to the type‐1 electrocardiographic (ECG) phenotype of Brugada syndrome (BrS), while data on the significance and feasibility of mapping repolarization dispersion in BrS patients are scarce. Moreover, the role of endocardial repolarization dispersion in BrS is poorly investigated. We aimed to assess endocardial repolarization patterns through an automated calculation of activation recovery interval (ARI) estimated on unipolar electrograms (UEGs) in spontaneous type‐1 BrS patients and controls; we also investigated the relation between ARI and right ventricle activation time (RVAT), and T‐wave peak‐to‐end interval (Tpe) in BrS patients. Methods Patients underwent endocardial high‐density electroanatomical mapping (HDEAM); BrS showing an overt type‐1 ECG were defined as OType1, while those without (latent type‐1 ECG and LType1) received ajmaline infusion. BrS patients only underwent programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Data were elaborated to obtain ARI corrected with the Bazett formula (ARIc), while RVAT was derived from activation maps. Results 39 BrS subjects (24 OType1 and 15 LTtype1) and 4 controls were enrolled. OType1 and post‐ajmaline LType1 showed longer mean ARIc than controls (306 ± 27.3 ms and 333.3 ± 16.3 ms vs. 281.7 ± 10.3 ms, p = .05 and p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?