Abstract:BackgroundOur institution is facing increasing demand for oncology testing that requires high quality DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. The current DNA extraction workflow involves a time and labor-intensive manual process that limits our ability to accommodate increasing downstream clinical testing volumes. We evaluated the KingFisher (KF) Flex utilizing Autolys M Tubes and the MagMAX FFPE DNA/RNA Ultra Kit as a possible high-throughput, automated DNA isolation workflow option that would decrease hands-on time and be conducive to volume growth without the need for additional staff.MethodsDNA from 52 FFPE tissue samples (n=24 unique cases previously extracted by the current "manual method") were extracted using Autolys M tubes, the MagMAX FFPE DNA/RNA Ultra Kit, and the KF Flex (Thermo Fisher Scientific Waltham, MA) over 4 "automated method" runs. Method modifications to the published procedure were introduced over the runs to determine any effects on DNA quality/quantity. Timings were taken during each run to compare hands-on and total run time against that of the manual method. Precision experiments were performed by extracting 4 replicates of sample on a single run (intra-assay precision) and 2 samples from 2 cases over 2 runs (inter-assay precision). Three cases were processed using varying tissue input levels to assess input-yield correlation. DNA yield was measured using HS dsDNA Qubit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). A subset of samples was tested by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) (n=10), chromosomal microsomal microarray (CMA) (n=1), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) (n=3). Variants and QC metrics of the KF DNA were compared to those of the manual method DNA.ResultsThe average total DNA yield was 3% lower from samples extracted following the manufacturer recommended KF procedure compared to matched samples extracted using the manual method (n=28 samples from 23 unique cases). A CV of 2.8% was observed in an intra-assay experiment (n=4 replicates from 1 case) and 3.0% in an average inter-assay experiment (n=2 replicates from 2 cases). There was a direct correlation between the tissue input amount (4 amounts of varied tissue input) and the total DNA yield (n=3 samples). We observed concordant fractional abundance values for ddPCR samples and concordant variant detection for NGS and CMA samples. We did not see a significant difference in the quality metrics tracked for any of the downstream testing assays.ConclusionsThis evaluation demonstrated that, as compared to our manual method, the automated method resulted in comparable DNA yields and downstream assay results. The incorporation of this automation would significantly increase our FFPE DNA extraction capacity without requiring additional staff while reducing hands-on time per run by about six hours. We would also be able to reduce ergonomic hazards related to tube cap manipulation, eliminate use of hazardous reagents, and leverage the plate format to better integrate extracted DNA into our clinical sample preparation workflows. These operational benefits highlight the value of automating high-throughput workflows.

Initial testing of an applicator prototype to facilitate forensic DNA recovery by tapelifting

Predicting probative levels of touch DNA on tapelifts using DiamondTM Nucleic Acid Dye

An evaluation of two adhesive media for the recovery of DNA from latent fingermarks: A preliminary study.

Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs

Precision Touch DNA Sampling on Plastic Bag Knots for Improved Profiling of Packer and Holder Contributions

Towards developing forensically relevant single-cell pipelines by incorporating direct-to-PCR extraction: compatibility, signal quality, and allele detection

Combining DiamondTM Nucleic Acid Dye with cyanoacrylate fuming for detection of fingermarks and visualising latent DNA

Integrated DNA purification, PCR, sample cleanup, and capillary electrophoresis microchip for forensic human identification.

Detection of invisible biological traces in relation to the physicochemical properties of substrates surfaces in forensic casework

A centrifugal microfluidic device with integrated gold leaf electrodes for the electrophoretic separation of DNA

An innovative approach for low input forensic DNA sample analysis using the GlobalFiler™ IQC PCR amplification Kit on the Magelia® platform

Integrated sample cleanup and capillary array electrophoresis microchip for forensic short tandem repeat analysis

"Total Human DNA Sampling" - Forensic DNA profiles from large areas

Sequencing DNA sampling and fingerprint development using DNA-free consumables: fingermark obliteration versus DNA recovery is not a zero-sum game

B-231 Evaluation of the KingFisher Flex for DNA Isolation From FFPE Tissue Utilizing Autolys M Tubes and the MagMAX FFPE DNA/RNA Ultra Kit

Transfer and recovery of DNA and metal particles: A proof-of-concept application of a parallel strategy by DNA and environmental scanning electron microscopy analysis

A direct analysis method using sheath flow probe electrospray ionisation‐mass spectrometry (sfPESI‐MS) to detect drug residues from fingerprint forensic gel lifts

Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Powder-Treated Fingermarks on Forensic Gelatin Lifters and its Application for Separating Overlapping Fingermarks

Conjugation of visual enhancers in lateral flow immunoassay for rapid forensic analysis: A critical review

Demonstration of potential DNA contamination introduced by laboratory consumables using Fluorescein

Optimization of InnoXtract™ extraction and purification system for DNA extraction from skeletal samples