Geriatric assessment (GA) in elderly patients with urothelial cancer (UC): Can GA select frail patients and avoid toxic treatment? Multidisciplinary single center experience.

Maria Regina Girones Sarrio,Maria Arnal Rondán,Miguel Angel Berenguer Francés,Alba Girones Torres Martínez,Antonio Jose Conde Moreno,José Luis Pontones,Francisco Delgado,Cristina Bonastre,David Ramos,Nuria Gómez Sepúlveda,David Lorente Estelles,Silvia Forcano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.564
IF: 45.3
2024-01-31
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:564 Background: UC is a disease of the elderly. Median age at UC diagnosis is olderthan for other major tumours (73 years old). The correct management of UC in the elderly remains controversial. Treatment-decisions should be based on biological age, not in chronological one. The role of geriatric assessment (GA) evolution is potentially beneficial. It has been detected between 10% to 25% frailty patients aged over 65 years are characterised as frail on GA on other tumors. GA has not been studied prospectively in UC patients. Objective: to assess the paper of GA in elderly patients with UC patients attended in an outpatient medical oncology consultation. To confirm that GA can detect at least 25% of frailty patients unsuitable for active treatment. Methods: Prospective interventional study. GA was done by a Geriatrician at patient’s home. Treatment-decisions were based on GA results, physician choice and patients/caregivers goals. Population: patients ≥ 70 years old sent from January 2019 to September 2023 diagnosed with UC. Patients unsuitable to be ambulatory (Performance status PS ≥ 3) were excluded. Ethics review board approved the analysis. All participants signed informed consent. Results: 82 patients were aged ≥ 70 years old (57% of all patients attended). Table shows patient’s information. GA detected 24 (30%) of frailty patients. They were elder, former smokers, had worse PS and worse overall survival in all stages. Non frail patient received active treatment. Comorbid and polypharmacy population was found in all three GA groups. More fit and vulnerable patients were treated with cisplatin by GA assessment than if we have applied Galsky criteria. This suggests than the strict use of a CrcL < 60 ml/min is still controversial. Conclusions: In a very selected population, GA can still find 30% of frail patients unsuitable for treatment. Frailty seems to be a predictive and prognostic factor in elderly patients with UC. Treatment selection based on GA increase the number of patients suitable for platinum treatment. Defining “platinum-ineligible” patients with metastatic urothelial cancer should be reviewed. Selection bias cannot be excluded from our analysis.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?