Eugenics, Nazism, and the Journal

Joan Y. Reede,Eric J. Rubin,David S. Jones,Paul A. Lombardo,Allan M. Brandt,Joelle M. Abi-Rached

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp2413484

IF: 158.5

2024-11-18

New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract:New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 391, Issue 19, November 14, 2024.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Chinese geneticists' views of ethical issues in genetic testing and screening: evidence for eugenics in China

X Mao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/302020

Abstract:To identify Chinese geneticists' views of ethical issues in genetic testing and screening, a national survey was conducted. Of 402 Chinese geneticists asked to participate, 255 (63%) returned by mail anonymous questionnaires. The majority of respondents thought that genetic testing should be offered in the workplace for alpha-antitrypsin deficiency (95%) and the predisposition of executives to heart disease, cancer, and diabetes (94%); that genetic testing should be included in preemployment physical examinations (86%); that governments should require premarital carrier tests (86%), newborn screening for sickle cell (77%), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (71%); and that children should be tested for genes for late-onset disorders such as Huntington disease (85%), susceptibility to cancers (85%), familial hypercholesterolemia (84%), alcoholism (69%), and Alzheimer disease (61%). Most believed that partners should know each other's genetic status before marriage (92%), that carriers of the same defective gene should not mate with each other (91%), and that women should have a prenatal diagnosis if medically indicated (91%). The majority said that in China decisions about family planning were shared by the couple (82%). More than half had views that, in China, there were no laws to prohibit disability discrimination (64%), particularly to protect people with adult polycystic kidney disease (57%), cystic fibrosis (56%), or genetic predisposition to other diseases (50%). To some extent, these results might provide a basis for a discussion of eugenics in China, particularly about China's Maternal and Infant Health Care Law (1994).
Reviewers for the Journal, July–December 2023

Eric J. Rubin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejme2400304

IF: 158.5

2024-02-08

New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract:New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 390, Issue 6, Page 558-558, February 2024.

medicine, general & internal
[Mentalities and sterilization laws in Europe during the 1930s. Eugenics, genetics, and politics in a historic context]

V Roelcke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-002-1423-z

Abstract:The laws and related practice of sterilisation in Germany during the Nazi period (1933-1945) were not isolated phenomena. Rather, they have to be understood in the broader context of the eugenic and racial hygiene movement developing internationally during the first decades of the twentieth century. Central conditions allowing its emergence were scientific, sociopolitical, and cultural factors. Fears of biological degeneration, economic considerations, and trust in the future potential of biology and in particular genetics played a crucial role in many western societies. Eugenics and the practice of sterilisation are constitutively linked to scientific justifications, just as - complementarily - the development of genetics, in particular psychiatric genetics, is inextricably associated with eugenics and its funding by philanthropic or state institutions. Parallels and a multiplicity of mutual relations existed on various levels, in particular between Germany, the US, and Scandinavian countries.
Eugenics ideals, racial hygiene, and the emigration process of German-American neurogeneticist Franz Josef Kallmann (1897-1965)

Stephen Pow,Frank W Stahnisch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2016.1187486

Abstract:Biological psychiatry in the early twentieth century was based on interrelated disciplines, such as neurology and experimental biology. Neuropsychiatrist Franz Josef Kallmann (1897-1965) was a product of this interdisciplinary background who showed an ability to adapt to different scientific contexts, first in the field of neuromorphology in Berlin, and later in New York. Nonetheless, having innovative ideas, as Kallmann did, could be an ambiguous advantage, since they could lead to incommensurable scientific views and marginalization in existing research programs. Kallmann followed his Dr. Med. degree (1919) with training periods at the Charité Medical School in Berlin under psychiatrist Karl Bonhoeffer (1868-1948). Subsequently, he collaborated with Ernst Ruedin (1874-1952), investigating sibling inheritance of schizophrenia and becoming a protagonist of genetic research on psychiatric conditions. In 1936, Kallmann was forced to immigrate to the USA where he published The Genetics of Schizophrenia (1938), based on data he had gathered from the district pathological institutes of Berlin's public health department. Kallmann resumed his role as an international player in biological psychiatry and genetics, becoming president (1952) of the American Society of Human Genetics and Director of the New York State Psychiatric Institute in 1955. While his work was well received by geneticists, the idea of genetic differences barely took hold in American psychiatry, largely because of émigré psychoanalysts who dominated American clinical psychiatry until the 1960s and established a philosophical direction in which genetics played no significant role, being regarded as dangerous in light of Nazi medical atrocities. After all, medical scientists in Nazi Germany had been among the social protagonists of racial hygiene which, under the aegis of Nazi philosophies, replaced medical genetics as the basis for the ideals and application of eugenics.
Telling a scientific story and governing the population: The Kallikak story and the historical mutations of the eugenic discourse.

Thom Axelsson,Jonas Qvarsebo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000256

IF: 0.838

2024-04-11

History of Psychology

Abstract:In this article, we follow the trails of 20th-century psychologist Henry Herbert Goddard's influential study of the Kallikak family. Goddard's study is treated as a scientific story with two interlocking dimensions: One is the actual story of the Kallikak family, with literary elements such as setting, plot, and characters. The other dimension is the broader eugenic discourse, a powerful scientific narrative that calls for action in relation to society and the population. The purpose of the article is twofold. Firstly, to analyze the forming and articulations of this story and to explore some of the consequences for governing the population that it has made possible. Secondly, to explore some aspects of what a Foucauldian analytics of government can contribute with in relation to Goddard's work and the eugenic discourse from the early 20th century to today. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

psychology, multidisciplinary,history of social sciences
The End of the One-Child Policy

Therese Hesketh,Xudong Zhou,Yun Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.16279

IF: 11.816

2015-01-01

JAMA

Abstract:Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcasts Clinical Reviews Editors' Summary Medical News Author Interviews More Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA journal
A Journal of the COVID-19 (Plague) Year

Brian H Childs,Laura Vearrier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09448-6

HEC Forum

Abstract:The essays in this special issue of HEC Forum provide reflections that make explicit the implicit anthropology that our current pandemic has brought but which in the medical ethics literature around COVID-19 has to a great extent ignored. Three of the essays are clearly "journalistic" as a literary genre: one by a hospital chaplain, one by a medical student in her pre-clinical years, and one by a fourth-year medical student who reports her experience as she completed her undergraduate clerkships and applied for positions in graduate medical education. Other essays explore the pandemic from historical, sociological, and economic perspectives, particularly how triage policies have been found to be largely blind to structural healthcare disparities, while simultaneously unable to appropriately address those disparities. Central issues that need to be addressed in triage are not just whether a utilitarian response is the most just response, but what exactly is the greatest good for the greatest number? Together, the essays in this special issue of HEC Forum create a call for a more anthropological approach to understanding health and healthcare. The narrow approach of viewing health as resulting primarily from healthcare will continue to hinder advances and perpetuate disparities. Health outcomes result from a complex interaction of various social, economic, cultural, historical, and political factors. Advancing healthcare requires contextualizing the health of populations amongst these factors. The COVID-19 pandemic has made us keenly aware of how interdependent our health as a society can be.
The blood from Auschwitz and the silence of the scholars

B Müller-Hill

Abstract:The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Genetics and Eugenics in Berlin-Dahlem was the centre of scientific racism in Nazi Germany. Its bad history culminated in a research project to analyse the molecular basis of racial differences in the susceptibility to various infectious diseases such as tuberculosis. Josef Mengele, a former postdoc of the director of the institute, Otmar von Verschuer, collected blood samples and other material in Auschwitz from families and twins of Jews and Gypsies. The blood samples were analysed by Günther Hillmann in the Berlin laboratory of Nobel Prize winner Adolf Butenandt. Butenandt had just moved to Tübingen. The project was paid for by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Butenandt, Hillmann and von Verschuer made scientific careers in the Federal Republic. To the present day this past has not been acknowledged by the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft as part of its history.
Human genetics in troubled times and places

Peter S Harper

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-017-0042-4

2017-08-03

Hereditas

Abstract:The development of human genetics world-wide during the twentieth century, especially across Europe, has occurred against a background of repeated catastrophes, including two world wars and the ideological problems and repression posed by Nazism and Communism. The published scientific literature gives few hints of these problems and there is a danger that they will be forgotten. The First World War was largely indiscriminate in its carnage, but World War 2 and the preceding years of fascism were associated with widespread migration, especially of Jewish workers expelled from Germany, and of their children, a number of whom would become major contributors to the post-war generation of human and medical geneticists in Britain and America. In Germany itself, eminent geneticists were also involved in the abuses carried out in the name of 'eugenics' and 'race biology'. However, geneticists in America, Britain and the rest of Europe were largely responsible for the ideological foundations of these abuses. In the Soviet Union, geneticists and genetics itself became the object of persecution from the 1930s till as late as the mid 1960s, with an almost complete destruction of the field during this time; this extended also to Eastern Europe and China as part of the influence of Russian communism. Most recently, at the end of the twentieth century, China saw a renewal of government sponsored eugenics programmes, now mostly discarded. During the post-world war 2 decades, human genetics research benefited greatly from recognition of the genetic dangers posed by exposure to radiation, following the atomic bomb explosions in Japan, atmospheric testing and successive accidental nuclear disasters in Russia. Documenting and remembering these traumatic events, now largely forgotten among younger workers, is essential if we are to fully understand the history of human genetics and avoid the repetition of similar disasters in the future. The power of modern human genetic and genomic techniques now gives a greater potential for abuse as well as for beneficial use than has ever been seen in the past.
Introduction: Reimagining Epidemics

Mary E Fissell,Jeremy A Greene,Randall M Packard,James A Schafer,Mary E. Fissell,Jeremy A. Greene,Randall M. Packard,James A. Schafer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2020.0081

2020-01-01

Bulletin of the History of Medicine

Abstract:Over the past year, historians of medicine have found our discipline invested with a new sense of relevance. In trying to make sense of epidemics past and present, many of us have been substantially influenced by Charles Rosenberg's 1989 Daedalus essay, "What Is an Epidemic? AIDS in Historical Perspective." Writing in the middle of another unfolding global pandemic, Rosenberg suggested that all epidemics possessed similar forms of social choreography, and that applying a narrative framework could help to understand their sequence, structure, and social impact. This issue of the Bulletin offers contributions from thirteen scholars working in various geographic, chronological, and thematic areas that engage with Rosenberg's fundamental historical question about what defines an epidemic, although the question takes on different forms, and different forms of urgency, in each of their works.

history & philosophy of science,health care sciences & services
The Journal's Historical "Indian Problem"

Alec J Calac,Luis R Gasca,William H Swain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc2401454

IF: 158.5

2024-03-15

New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract:New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 390, Issue 11, Page 1059-1060, March 2024.

medicine, general & internal
Maurizio Meloni. Political Biology: Science and Social Values in Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 284 Pp.

Norman MacLeod

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/694147

2017-01-01

Critical Inquiry

Abstract:Previous articleNext article No AccessThe CI ReviewMaurizio Meloni. Political Biology: Science and Social Values in Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 284 pp.Norman MacLeodNorman MacLeod Search for more articles by this author Norman MacLeod (BSc, MSc, PhD, FGS, FLS) is a researcher at the Natural History Museum (London) having formerly been that institution’s Keeper of Palaeontology (2001–2012) and dean of postgraduate education and training (2012–2016). MacLeod is also honorary professor at University College London and a visiting professor at the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. He is the editor of Automated Taxon Identification in Systematics: Theory, Approaches, and Applications (2007), the author of The Great Extinctions: What Causes Them and How They Shape Life (2013), the editor-in-chief of Grzimek’s Animal Life Encyclopedia: Extinctions (2013), and the coeditor with Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra of Issues in Palaeobiology: A Global View—Interviews and Essays (2014). He is currently writing a book on the mathematical analysis of morphology. Professor MacLeod also serves as cochief editor of Palaeoworld, associate editor of Systematic Biology, and an editorial board member of Royal Society Proceedings B (Biological Sciences).PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Critical Inquiry Volume 44, Number 1Autumn 2017 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/694147 Views: 102Total views on this site © 2017 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. For permission to reuse, contact [email protected]PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
[The dispute over eugenics in interwar Poland]

K Kawalec

Abstract:The eugenic problem seems not as well known as it was in the period between the world wars. The word "eugenics" was introduced into the scientific language by the British biologist, Francis Galton at the end of the XIX century. In general, it means the study of the methods of protecting and improving the quality of the human race by selective breeding. Galton's remarks initiated a wider (social and political) movement, which was active in some countries. The eugenic tendency was visible in American immigration policy before the Great War - making it difficult for people suffering from particular diseases to enter the USA. After the war, the eugenic movement became much stronger. In some countries (e.g. Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Switzerland, Germany, and over half of the states of the USA) some components of the eugenic programme were introduced into legislation. The eugenic movement also appeared in reconstructed Poland. In 1918 it published it own magazine "Zagadnienia Rasy" (Problems of Human Race), later "Eugenika Polska" (Polish Eugenics). This did not imply however, that interest in the eugenic programme was generally very strong. In fact, it was limited by the influence of the Catholic Church. Another significant factor was lost Polish - German hostility. In the late thirties eugenic slogans lost popularity because of their use in Germany racist policy.
Eugenics visualized: the exhibit of the Third International Congress of Eugenics, 1932

Devon Stillwell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2012.0025

Abstract:This article investigates the exhibit of the Third International Congress of Eugenics, which was organized by Harry Hamilton Laughlin and showcased at the American Museum of Natural History in 1932. It argues that the exhibit's displays shaped popular eugenic ideology by connecting particular eugenic principles to specific visual representations that were experienced in relation to binaries such as the artistically traditional and the modern, the classical and the grotesque, and the scientific and the spectacle (or the "freak" and the medical specimen). These dichotomies were, in turn, experienced within the context of the exhibit's overall theme of eugenics as anchored in the past and the future and concern over the differential birthrate. The exhibit to the Third Congress provides insight into growing tensions within the eugenics movement of the 1930s, the importance of positive eugenics, the aesthetics of heredity, and how the "scientific truths" of a given era are publicized and perpetuated.
Science and policy in the Third Reich: a commentary on history and current relevance

Michael Shevell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03123-5

IF: 3.953

2024-03-06

Pediatric Research

Abstract:The readership of this journal, comprising pediatric clinicians and child health investigators, collectively put their faith in the objectivity of science. The process of the scientific method yields 'facts' that are proven and rigorous beyond dispute. Being factual they are importantly also accepted as value-neutral. These facts are then applied in the clinic to inform the desired practice of evidence-based medicine to choose the best approach for a child's particular health challenge and are foundational in the laboratory (whether 'wet' or 'dry' in methodology) to inform and guide the steady advancement of knowledge. Oftentimes, it is urged by clinicians and investigators that the facts yielded by science be utilized by policy makers, including politicians, to inform public health decisions. While at first glance the points brought forward in the above paragraph appear self-evident and beyond debate, there have been instances in human history when either the 'facts' of science might actually be wrong and the agenda for public health, though presumably having a scientific basis, might be in the service of what are ultimately nefarious objectives. Both of these occurrences should not come as any surprise. After all, science intrinsically requires a process of testability that carries the element of a necessary risk that a 'proven' theory or set of 'facts' may be shown to be wrong. 1 The history of medical science is littered with such instances when accepted 'dogma' undergoes a paradigm shift and is shown to have been conclusively erroneous. Unfortunately, human history is also littered with instances of political theories offering depraved intentions and solutions in the guise of health policy that are in reality gravely injurious, deleterious, and in some extreme instances, actually intentionally lethal to segments of the population. 2

pediatrics
The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Table of Content, Vol. 529, No. 8, June, 2021

P. Hof,Mount Sinai,Associate Editors,D. Benson,E. Callaway,T. Finger,J. Kordower,A. Huberman,K. Rockland,J. Rubenstein,U. Homberg,A. Basbaum,M. Bickford,J. Bourne,H. Cline,S. Courtney,C. Distler,C. Greer,S. Grillner,K. M. Harris,E. Jarvis,J. Kaas,H. Karten,L. Krubitzer,G. Luppino,R. Morecraft,J. Mpodozis,E. Mufson,L. Pessoa,L. Richards,M. T. Shipley,R. Stocker,R. Stornetta,E. Strettoi,S. Travers,D. I. Vaney,Robert P. Vertes,M. Wullimann,N. Yamamoto,Zhengang Yang,J. Serra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.25132

2021-01-01

Abstract:ASSOCIATE EDITORS DEANNA L. BENSON Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai EDWARD M. CALLAWAY Salk Ins tute THOMAS E. FINGER University of Colorado School of Medicine JEFFREY H. KORDOWER Rush University Medical Center ANDREW D. HUBERMAN Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA KATHLEEN S. ROCKLAND Boston University School of Medicine JOHN L.R. RUBENSTEIN University of California, San Francisco UWE HOMBERG University of Marburg
The genetics revolution. Ethical, legal, and insurance concerns

G C Cunningham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.2000.07.1163

Abstract:Genetic researchers will soon complete a structural description of the human genome. Understanding of the detailed function and interactions of the genes will soon follow, as will the ability to manipulate genes and use them for our own purposes. This knowledge will force us to rethink our basic philosophy of life and fundamental ethics. The accumulating body of knowledge will have profound effects on the view of human beings in the cosmos and on human interactions and institutions. Although change will be gradual, primary care physicians should be prepared to deal with this process, even in today's practice. The crucial concerns are proper patient education and consent for genetic testing, maintenance of confidentiality, and awareness of a patient's right to access health insurance and specialty care. The unprecedented control of the genetic makeup of human beings will affect society's concepts of race, equality, disability, and social responsibility.
"The highest in each class was a twilight baby": scientific motherhood, twilight sleep and the eugenics movement in McClure's Magazine

Jerika Sanderson,Heather A Love

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012859

2024-08-14

Abstract:In the early twentieth century, childbirth was increasingly being viewed as a medical experience in North America. Women were encouraged to engage with 'scientific motherhood' by adhering to medical advice and undergoing the latest medical and technological interventions. Two movements simultaneously emerged that engaged with scientific motherhood: the positive eugenics movement, which sought to encourage reproduction among specific groups, and the twilight sleep movement, which promoted the use of pain management during childbirth. While these two distinct movements had different goals, they intersected both in their intended audiences (white, middle-class and upper-class American women) and in their prioritisation of medical and scientific authority. This article builds on work that has identified connections between twilight sleep and the eugenics movement to consider the role of twentieth-century magazines in rhetorically linking the eugenics and twilight sleep movements, and how this contributed to constructing the cultural role of the 'scientific mother'.As a key proponent of twilight sleep, the American monthly periodical McClure's Magazine is the focus of this investigation. Articles published in McClure's incorporated the rhetoric of the eugenics movement to promote twilight sleep and 'painless childbirth', while also engaging with concerns of the eugenics movement by framing the falling birthrate among American women as a social and political problem. Alongside the rhetorical framing within McClure's articles, we focus on visual material such as photographs that exhibit 'eugenic mothers' and healthy 'twilight sleep babies' to promote the method's safety and efficacy to American audiences. This article incorporates scholarship on early twentieth-century eugenics and photography, women's involvement in the eugenics movement, and twilight sleep and the politics of women's health. Through its analysis, this article demonstrates that the convergence of developments in obstetrics and the eugenics movement in popular media had complex implications for women's reproductive agency in the early twentieth century.
Family, kinship, memory and temporality in the age of the new genetics

Kaja Finkler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.002

Abstract:The new genetics has now become an integral part of contemporary biomedicine, promising great advances in alleviating disease. Like any scientific endeavor, beliefs in the new genetics tend to give new meanings to people's lives and therefore have significant implications for people's lived experience. Drawing on fieldwork in the USA and research in various literatures, the aim of this article is to explore the role the new genetics plays in mainstream American society as revealed in people's narratives of their families' medical histories. An anthropological analysis of these narratives illuminates multilayered cultural meanings of genetic inheritance and the role biomedical conceptualizations play not only in explaining disease etiologies and treatment, but also in addressing concerns that bear on the postmodern experience of family, kinship, choice, memory, time-space, relatedness, sociality and immortality.
Confronting scientific racism in psychology: Lessons from evolutionary biology and genetics.

Kevin A. Bird,John P. Jackson,Andrew S. Winston

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001228

IF: 16.358

2024-07-23

American Psychologist

Abstract:Although the American Psychological Association has taken a strong antiracism stance, scientific racism continues to be published in psychology journals and scholarly books. Recent articles claim that the folk categories of race are genetically meaningful divisions and that evolved genetic differences among races and nations are important for explaining immutable differences in cognitive ability, educational attainment, crime, sexual behavior, and wealth; all claims that are opposed by a strong scientific consensus to the contrary. These claims remain a serious source of harm through the naturalization of inequality and through support for the work of racial extremists. Contemporary "racial hereditarian research" claims to rest on modern genetics and evolutionary biology and to draw on their methods, such as genome-wide association studies. These new arguments fail to meet the evidentiary and ethical standards of these disciplines for the study of human variation. If psychology adopted standards from genetics and evolutionary biology, the current racial hereditarian work would be ineligible for publication. Actions that the American Psychological Association can take to deal with scientific racism are described. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

psychology, multidisciplinary

Eugenics, Nazism, and the Journal

Chinese geneticists' views of ethical issues in genetic testing and screening: evidence for eugenics in China

Reviewers for the Journal, July–December 2023

[Mentalities and sterilization laws in Europe during the 1930s. Eugenics, genetics, and politics in a historic context]

Eugenics ideals, racial hygiene, and the emigration process of German-American neurogeneticist Franz Josef Kallmann (1897-1965)

Telling a scientific story and governing the population: The Kallikak story and the historical mutations of the eugenic discourse.

The End of the One-Child Policy

A Journal of the COVID-19 (Plague) Year

The blood from Auschwitz and the silence of the scholars

Human genetics in troubled times and places

Introduction: Reimagining Epidemics

The Journal's Historical "Indian Problem"

Maurizio Meloni. Political Biology: Science and Social Values in Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 284 Pp.

[The dispute over eugenics in interwar Poland]

Eugenics visualized: the exhibit of the Third International Congress of Eugenics, 1932

Science and policy in the Third Reich: a commentary on history and current relevance

The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Table of Content, Vol. 529, No. 8, June, 2021

The genetics revolution. Ethical, legal, and insurance concerns

"The highest in each class was a twilight baby": scientific motherhood, twilight sleep and the eugenics movement in McClure's Magazine

Family, kinship, memory and temporality in the age of the new genetics

Confronting scientific racism in psychology: Lessons from evolutionary biology and genetics.