Association of proteinuria with improved prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab, and the predictive role of serum vascular endothelial growth factor D levels: A multicenter retrospective study

Zijian Yang,Goki Suda,Takuya Sho,Osamu Maehara,Masatsugu Ohara,Tomoka Yoda,Qingjie Fu,Takashi Sasaki,Risako Kohya,Sonoe Yoshida,Shunichi Hosoda,Takashi Kitagataya,Naoki Kawagishi,Masato Nakai,Mitsuteru Natsuizaka,Koji Ogawa,Shunsuke Ohnishi,Yoshiya Yamamoto,Masaru Baba,Ren Yamada,Tomoe Kobayashi,Minhu Chen,Naoya Sakamoto,for the NORTE Study Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.14139
2024-11-29
Hepatology Research
Abstract:This study challenges conventional understanding by demonstrating that grade 2 or higher proteinuria during atezolizumab and bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is unexpectedly associated with improved prognosis. The identification of baseline serum vascular endothelial growth factor‐D levels as predictive biomarkers adds novel insights into personalized treatment strategies, potentially guiding clinical decision‐making in oncology. Aim Atezolizumab/bevacizumab is a first‐line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Among several adverse events, grade ≥2 proteinuria is considered a significant adverse event that may cause bevacizumab interruption. Studies have shown that proteinuria might predict improved prognosis, although data are scarce and the association remains controversial, and the mechanisms and predictive factors remain unclear. We aimed to clarify these. Methods In this multicenter retrospective study, we screened patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab. The prognostic impact of grade ≥2 proteinuria was examined in patients with proper clinical data and preserved serum for growth factor analysis. For biomarker analysis predicting proteinuria, baseline serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)‐A, VEGF‐C, and VEGF‐D levels were analyzed. Results This study included 75 patients, and 32 (42.7%) experienced grade ≥2 proteinuria. No significant differences were observed between those with or without proteinuria, except for aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase levels. Time‐dependent Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that grade ≥2 proteinuria was significantly associated with better prognosis (hazard ratio 0.221; 95% confidence interval 0.082–0.592; p = 0.003). In biomarker analysis, low baseline serum VEGF‐C and VEGF‐D levels were significantly associated with proteinuria, and multivariate analysis demonstrated that baseline serum VEGF‐D level was significantly associated with grade ≥2 proteinuria (hazard ratio 0.101; 95% confidence interval 0.029–0.357; p
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?