Abstract:Within the fields of materials mechanics, the consideration of physical laws in machine learning predictions besides the use of data can enable low prediction errors and robustness as opposed to predictions only based on data. On the one hand, exclusive utilization of fundamental physical relationships might show significant deviations in their predictions compared to reality, due to simplifications and assumptions. On the other hand, using only data and neglecting well-established physical laws can create the need for unreasonably large data sets that are required to exhibit low bias and are usually expensive to collect. However, fundamental but simplified physics in combination with a corrective model that compensates for possible deviations, e.g., to experimental data, can lead to physics-based predictions with low prediction errors, also despite scarce data. In this article, it is demonstrated that a hybrid model approach consisting of a physics-based model that is corrected via an artificial neural network represents an efficient prediction tool as opposed to a purely data-driven model. In particular, a semi-analytical model serves as an efficient low-fidelity model with noticeable prediction errors outside its calibration domain. An artificial neural network is used to correct the semi-analytical solution towards a desired reference solution provided by high-fidelity finite element simulations, while the efficiency of the semi-analytical model is maintained and the applicability range enhanced. We utilize residual stresses that are induced by laser shock peening as a use-case example. In addition, it is shown that non-unique relationships between model inputs and outputs lead to high prediction errors and the identification of salient input features via dimensionality analysis is highly beneficial to achieve low prediction errors. In a generalization task, predictions are also outside the process parameter space of the training region while remaining in the trained range of corrections. The corrective model predictions show substantially smaller errors than purely data-driven model predictions, which illustrates one of the benefits of the hybrid modelling approach. Ultimately, when the amount of samples in the data set is reduced, the generalization of the physics-related corrective model outperforms the purely data-driven model, which also demonstrates efficient applicability of the proposed hybrid modelling approach to problems where data is scarce.

Hybrid Physical-Deep Learning Model for Astronomical Inverse Problems

Bayesian Inference and Deep Learning for Inverse Problems

Learning functional priors and posteriors from data and physics

Hybrid deep learning and physics-based neural network for programmable illumination computational microscopy

Tackling the Problem of Distributional Shifts: Correcting Misspecified, High-Dimensional Data-Driven Priors for Inverse Problems

Resolution-independent generative models based on operator learning for physics-constrained Bayesian inverse problems

Model Optimization for Deep Space Exploration via Simulators and Deep Learning

Scalable Bayesian Inference for Detection and Deblending in Astronomical Images

deep PACO: Combining statistical models with deep learning for exoplanet detection and characterization in direct imaging at high contrast

PI-AstroDeconv: A Physics-Informed Unsupervised Learning Method for Astronomical Image Deconvolution

On the integration of Physics-Based Machine Learning with hierarchical Bayesian modeling techniques

Physics-informed neural networks in the recreation of hydrodynamic simulations from dark matter

MODEL&CO: Exoplanet detection in angular differential imaging by learning across multiple observations

Hybrid VAE: Improving Deep Generative Models using Partial Observations

Hybrid summary statistics: neural weak lensing inference beyond the power spectrum

Half-sibling regression meets exoplanet imaging: PSF modeling and subtraction using a flexible, domain knowledge-driven, causal framework

A probabilistic generative model for semi-supervised training of coarse-grained surrogates and enforcing physical constraints through virtual observables

Generative models and Bayesian inversion using Laplace approximation

Including Physics in Deep Learning -- An example from 4D seismic pressure saturation inversion

Hybrid Modelling by Machine Learning Corrections of Analytical Model Predictions towards High-Fidelity Simulation Solutions