Abstract:Type Ia supernovae play a key role in the evolution of galaxies by polluting the interstellar medium with a fraction of iron peak elements larger than that released in the core-collapse supernova events. Their light curve, moreover, is widely used in cosmological studies as it constitutes a reliable distance indicator on extragalactic scales. Among the mechanisms proposed to explain the Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the single- and double-degenerate channels are thought to be the dominant ones, which implies a different distribution of time delays between the progenitor formation and the explosion. In this paper, we aim to determine the dominant mechanism by comparing a compilation of Type Ia SN rates with those computed from various cosmic star-formation histories coupled with different delay-time distribution functions. We also evaluate the relative contributions of both channels. By using a least-squares fitting procedure, we modeled the observations of Type Ia SN rates assuming different combinations of three recent cosmic star-formation rates and seven delay-time distributions. The goodness of these fits are statistically quantified by the $ test. For two of the three cosmic star-formation rates, the single degenerate scenario provides the most accurate explanation for the observations, while a combination of 34 single-degenerate- and 66 double-degenerate delay-time distributions is more plausible for the remaining tested cosmic star-formation rates. Though dependent on the assumed cosmic star-formation rate, we find arguments in favor of the single-degenerate model. From the theoretic point of view, at least sim 34 of the Type Ia SN must have been produced through the single-degenerate channel to account for the observations. The wide, double-degenerate mechanism slightly under-predicts the observations at redshift $z 1$, unless the cosmic SFR flattens in that regime. On the contrary, although the purely close double-degenerate scenario can be ruled out, we cannot rule out a mixed scenario with single- and double-degenerate progenitors.

Type Ia Supernovae from First-generation Stars

Type Ia Supernovae from First-generation Stars

The Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae with Long Delay Times

Cosmic Type Ia SN rate and constraints on SN Ia progenitors

Cosmic Type Ia supernova rate and constraints on supernova Ia progenitors

Type Ia Supernova Explosions in Binary Systems: A Review

Testing for Intrinsic Type Ia Supernova Luminosity Evolution at z>2 with JWST

Environmental Dependence of Type Ia Supernovae in Low-redshift Galaxy Clusters

ZTF SN Ia DR2: Evidence of Changing Dust Distributions With Redshift Using Type Ia Supernovae

The Relative Specific Type Ia Supernovae Rate from Three Years of ASAS-SN

Supernova Rates and Luminosity Functions from ASAS-SN I: 2014--2017 Type Ia SNe and Their Subtypes

Supernova rates and luminosity functions from ASAS-SN I: 2014–2017 type Ia SNe and their sub-types

ZTF SN Ia DR2: Evidence of changing dust distribution with redshift using type Ia supernovae

WD+RG systems as the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae

ON THE PROGENITORS OF SUPER-CHANDRASEKHAR MASS TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE

Prospects of Searching for Type Ia Supernovae with 2.5-M Wide Field Survey Telescope

The progenitors of Type Ia supernovae with asymptotic giant branch donors

A super-Eddington wind scenario for the progenitors of type Ia supernovae: binary population synthesis calculations

The Core-Degenerate Scenario for the Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae

Supernovae Ib and Ic from the explosion of helium stars