Abstract:Background: The current lower limb robotic exoskeleton training (LRET) for treating and managing stroke patients remains a huge challenge. Comprehensive ICF analysis and informative treatment options are needed. This review aims to analyze LRET' s efficacy for stroke patients, based on ICF, and explore the impact of intervention intensities, devices, and stroke phases. Methods: We searched Web of Science, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library for RCTs on LRET for stroke patients. Two authors reviewed studies, extracted data, and assessed quality and bias. Standardized protocols were used. PEDro and ROB2 were employed for quality assessment. All analyses were done with RevMan 5.4. Results: Thirty-four randomized controlled trials (1,166 participants) were included. For function, LRET significantly improved motor control (MD = 1.15, 95%CI = 0.29-2.01, p = 0.009, FMA-LE), and gait parameters (MD = 0.09, 95%CI = 0.03-0.16, p = 0.004, Instrumented Gait Velocity; MD = 0.06, 95%CI = 0.02-0.09, p = 0.002, Step length; MD = 4.48, 95%CI = 0.32-8.65, p = 0.04, Cadence) compared with conventional rehabilitation. For activity, LRET significantly improved walking independence (MD = 0.25, 95%CI = 0.02-0.48, p = 0.03, FAC), Gait Velocity (MD = 0.07, 95%CI = 0.03-0.11, p = 0.001) and balance (MD = 2.34, 95%CI = 0.21-4.47, p = 0.03, BBS). For participation, social participation (MD = 0.12, 95%CI = 0.03-0.21, p = 0.01, EQ-5D) was superior to conventional rehabilitation. Based on subgroup analyses, LRET improved motor control (MD = 1.37, 95%CI = 0.47-2.27, p = 0.003, FMA-LE), gait parameters (MD = 0.08, 95%CI = 0.02-0.14, p = 0.006, Step length), Gait Velocity (MD = 0.11, 95%CI = 0.03-0.19, p = 0.005) and activities of daily living (MD = 2.77, 95%CI = 1.37-4.16, p = 0.0001, BI) for the subacute patients, while no significant improvement for the chronic patients. For exoskeleton devices, treadmill-based exoskeletons showed significant superiority for balance (MD = 4.81, 95%CI = 3.10-6.52, p < 0.00001, BBS) and activities of daily living (MD = 2.67, 95%CI = 1.25-4.09, p = 0.00002, BI), while Over-ground exoskeletons was more effective for gait parameters (MD = 0.05, 95%CI = 0.02-0.08, p = 0.0009, Step length; MD = 6.60, 95%CI = 2.06-11.15, p = 0.004, Cadence) and walking independence (MD = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.14-0.44, p = 0.0002, FAC). Depending on the training regimen, better results may be achieved with daily training intensities of 45-60 min and weekly training intensities of 3 h or more. Conclusion: These findings offer insights for healthcare professionals to make effective LRET choices based on stroke patient needs though uncertainties remain. Particularly, the assessment of ICF participation levels and the design of time-intensive training deserve further study. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, Unique Identifier: CRD42024501750.

Is Leg-Driven Treadmill-Based Exoskeleton Robot Training Beneficial to Poststroke Patients

The Effectiveness of Overground Robot Exoskeleton Gait Training on Gait Outcomes, Balance, and Motor Function in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Effect of robotic exoskeleton training on lower limb function, activity and participation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy of a Novel Exoskeletal Robot for Locomotor Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients: A Multi-center, Non-inferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of unilateral lower-limb exoskeleton robot on balance and gait recovery and neuroplasticity in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Rehabilitation Effects Of Fatigue-Controlled Treadmill Training After Stroke: A Rat Model Study

Efficacy and safety of using a unilateral lower limb exoskeleton combined with conventional treatment in post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

Robotic Restoration of Gait Function in Patients in the Early Recovery Period of Stroke

Effects of robotic-assisted gait training on physical capacity, and quality of life among chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled study

Clinical research of lower extremity exoskeleton robot In post-stroke hemiplegic patients

Comparative efficacy of gait training for balance outcomes in patients with stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Therapeutic Effects of Robotic-Exoskeleton-Assisted Gait Rehabilitation and Predictive Factors of Significant Improvements in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Soft Robotic Exoskeleton for Gait Training on Clinical and Biomechanical Gait Outcomes in Patients with Sub-Acute Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Improved walking ability with wearable robot-assisted training in patients suffering chronic stroke

Feasibility of Challenging Treadmill Speed-Dependent Gait and Perturbation-Induced Balance Training in Chronic Stroke Patients with Low Ambulation Ability: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Effects of VR-assisted and Overground Gait Adaptation Training on Balance and Walking Ability in Stroke Patients

Effects of Virtual Reality with Robot Training on the Gait of Subacute Stroke Patients

The effect of balance and gait training on specific balance abilities of survivors with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Conflicting results of robot-assisted versus usual gait training during postacute rehabilitation of stroke patients: a randomized clinical trial

Efficacy of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program for non-ambulatory patients during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

Efficacy of rehabilitation robot-assisted gait training on lower extremity dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis