From yeast screening for suitability as single cell protein to fed-batch cultures

Alexander Anderson,Adriaan Van der Mijnsbrugge,Xavier Cameleyre,Nathalie Gorret
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-024-03504-0
2024-07-14
Biotechnology Letters
Abstract:Purpose: Fed-batch cultures have rarely been used in single cell protein (SCP) research. This work evaluated multiple yeast species for suitability as SCP cultivated using glucose- and sucrose-based substrate and performed in-depth studies of fed-batch SCP cultivation kinetics for selected yeasts, including determination of specific crude nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors. Methods: SCP was cultivated using fully synthetic media in flask batch or bioreactor fed-batch cultures. Crude nitrogen and nucleic acid content were determined using the Dumas method and fluorescence assay kits, respectively. Results: C. utilis compared favorably to other yeasts in flask batch cultures in terms of process yield (0.52 ± 0.01 g x g s −1 ) and crude nitrogen content (10.0 ± 0.5 and 9.9 ± 0.5% CDW for glucose and sucrose, respectively). This is the first time biomass composition data was reported for SCP cultivated in fed-batch mode. C. utilis crude nitrogen content was consistent across the tested conditions (protein content stabilized around 50% CDW in fed-batch), while that of the benchmark yeast S. cerevisiae was higher in batch cultures and at the beginning of fed-batch relative to the end (protein content decreased over time and stabilized around 43% CDW ). Total nucleic acid content of the yeasts was similar (6.8% CDW and 6.3% CDW , for C. utilis and S. cerevisiae , respectively), with crude nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors of 4.97 and 5.80. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the suitability of C. utilis as SCP, notably the robustness of its crude nitrogen content (as an indicator of protein content) across batch and fed-batch conditions, compared to that of the benchmark yeast S. cerevisiae .
biotechnology & applied microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?