Single-plane osteotomy model is inaccurate for evaluating the optimal strategy in treating vertical femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis
Shi Zhan,Dajun Jiang,Qingxiang Hu,Miao Wang,Chenglong Feng,Weitao Jia,Hai Hu,Wenxin Niu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108036
IF: 6.1
2024-01-20
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Abstract:Background and objectives The conventional method for simulating vertical femoral neck fractures (vFNFs) is via a vertical single-plane osteotomy (SPO) across the entire femur. However, the accuracy of SPO for evaluating the optimal internal fixation strategy (IFS) and the appropriate assessment parameters is not clear. This study thus aimed to examine the accuracy of SPO in evaluating IFSs and to identify appropriate evaluation parameters using finite element analysis. Methods Eighty patient-specific finite element models were developed based on CT images from eight vFNF patients. The natural fracture model was built using structural features of the affected side, while the SPO was simulated on the healthy side. Five different IFSs were applied to both the natural fracture and SPO groups. Thirteen parameters, including stress, displacement, and stiffness, were subjected to a two-way repeated measures ANOVA to determine the effect of IFSs and fracture morphology on stability. A Pearson correlation analysis was performed on varied parameters with various IFSs to identify independent parameters. Based on these independent parameters, the entropy evaluation method (EEM) score was used to rank the performance of IFSs for each patient. Results Eight of the thirteen parameters were significantly influenced by IFSs ( p < 0.05), two by fracture morphology ( p < 0.01), and none by the interaction between IFS and fracture morphology. In the natural fracture group, parameters including screw stress and displacement, bone cut rate (BCR), and compression effects varied independently with distinct IFSs. In the SPO group, trunk displacement, BCR, cut-out risk, and compression effects parameters changed independently. The BCR of the Alpha strategy was significantly higher than that of the Inverted strategy in the natural fracture group ( p = 0.002), whereas the opposite was observed in the SPO group ( p = 0.016). Regarding compression effects, two IFS pairings in the natural fracture group and seven IFS pairings in the SPO group exhibited significant differences. None of the five IFSs achieved the optimal EEM score for each patient. Conclusions The single-plane osteotomy model may have limitations in assessing IFSs, particularly when the bone cut rate and compression effects are the main influencing factors. Parameters of the screw stress and displacement, BCR, and compression effects appear to be relevant in evaluating IFSs for natural fracture models. It indicates that individualized natural fracture models could provide more comprehensive insights for determining the optimal IFS in treating vFNFs.
engineering, biomedical,computer science, interdisciplinary applications,medical informatics, theory & methods