Descending networks transform command signals into population motor control

Jonas Braun,Femke Hurtak,Sibo Wang-Chen,Pavan Ramdya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07523-9
IF: 64.8
2024-06-06
Nature
Abstract:To convert intentions into actions, movement instructions must pass from the brain to downstream motor circuits through descending neurons (DNs). These include small sets of command-like neurons that are sufficient to drive behaviours 1 —the circuit mechanisms for which remain unclear. Here we show that command-like DNs in Drosophila directly recruit networks of additional DNs to orchestrate behaviours that require the active control of numerous body parts. Specifically, we found that command-like DNs previously thought to drive behaviours alone 2,3,4 in fact co-activate larger populations of DNs. Connectome analyses and experimental manipulations revealed that this functional recruitment can be explained by direct excitatory connections between command-like DNs and networks of interconnected DNs in the brain. Descending population recruitment is necessary for behavioural control: DNs with many downstream descending partners require network co-activation to drive complete behaviours and drive only simple stereotyped movements in their absence. These DN networks reside within behaviour-specific clusters that inhibit one another. These results support a mechanism for command-like descending control in which behaviours are generated through the recruitment of increasingly large DN networks that compose behaviours by combining multiple motor subroutines.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is: how to understand how descending neurons (DNs) as a population drive and coordinate behavior. Specifically, the researchers explored the relationship between two models: one where a few "command" descending neurons (comDNs) can drive complete behavior on their own; and another where a larger number of descending neurons (popDNs) need to be co-activated to accomplish specific behaviors. Through experiments and technical means, the researchers tried to reveal the connection and mechanisms between these two models. ### Main Issues: 1. **Command descending neurons (comDNs) and behavior control**: The researchers wanted to understand whether activating a few command descending neurons could drive complete complex behavior, or if a larger number of descending neurons need to work together. 2. **Functional recruitment of the descending neuron network**: The researchers explored how command descending neurons recruit other descending neurons and whether this recruitment is necessary for behavior control. 3. **Structure and connectivity of the descending neuron network**: The researchers analyzed the connectivity patterns between descending neurons, particularly the direct and indirect connections between command descending neurons and other descending neurons. ### Experimental Methods: - **Optogenetic stimulation**: Using specific optogenetic tools (such as CsChrimson) to activate different command descending neurons (such as DNp09, aDN2, MDN) and observe their recruitment effects on other descending neurons. - **Calcium imaging**: Recording the activity of descending neurons in the brain using genetically encoded calcium indicators (such as GCaMP6s), especially at the cervical connectives. - **Anatomical experiments**: Investigating whether the recruitment of descending neurons depends on brain connections by severing the thoracic neurons (T1). ### Main Findings: 1. **Command descending neurons recruit other descending neurons**: Optogenetic stimulation of command descending neurons resulted in significant activation of other descending neurons, indicating that command descending neurons can indeed recruit other descending neurons. 2. **Necessity of the descending neuron network**: In headless experiments, some command descending neurons (such as DNp09 and aDN2) needed to recruit other descending neurons to drive complete behavior, while others (such as MDN) did not. 3. **Structure of the descending neuron network**: Connectome analysis revealed direct monosynaptic excitatory connections between command descending neurons and other descending neurons, and these connections exhibited strong recursiveness in the network. ### Conclusion: The research results support a new framework in which command descending neurons drive complex behaviors by recruiting other descending neurons. This recruitment mechanism combines multiple motor subprograms to generate complete actions. This finding helps to understand the role of descending neurons in behavior control and provides new perspectives for future neuroscience research.